Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
First of all, I made NO assertions about the polls, other than you and bfgrn weren't providing evidence of your OWN assertions. And you were not. Therefore there is nothing for me to "admit" I'm wrong about.Midnight, you done yet? Just admit you were wrong like with the Dis thing.
First of all, I made NO assertions about the polls, other than you and bfgrn weren't providing evidence of your OWN assertions. And you were not. Therefore there is nothing for me to "admit" I'm wrong about.Midnight, you done yet? Just admit you were wrong like with the Dis thing.
Secondly, did you try to vote more than once in the AOL poll I linked in the OP?
Show me where I made any assertions at all about it.But the question remains: Have either you or Robert tried to vote more than once in the AOL poll I linked in the OP?
But the question remains: Are you going to admit you were wrong about the AOL Straw Poll?
I DO get it. Can you show us something that proves that's what's happening here?You don't even get it, it's not about voting twice. It's about linking the poll to websites like Free Republic for Conservatives to vote on.
I tried it and wasn't able to. I can try from a separate location tomorrow?
I DO get it. Can you show us something that proves that's what's happening here?
That was a previous poll. What about this one? Shall we assume the same thing is happening, or is my original conclusion probably more reasonable? Or maybe, a combination of the two?I DO get it. Can you show us something that proves that's what's happening here?
I already gave you proof in the past about someone posting a previous AOL Straw Poll to be voted on at Free Republic.
As much as I'd sure to love the experience, I'm not about to go wander through extreme Republican sites.
That's completely wrong. If the numbers were the same and the names reversed, I would have been REALLY stunned and would have posted it earlier.The fact of the matter is Midnight, if this poll had been supportive of Obama, you wouldn't of posted it. Plain and simple.
That was a previous poll. What about this one? Shall we assume the same thing is happening, or is my original conclusion probably more reasonable? Or maybe, a combination of the two?
Remember, it’s not Barack Obama, not Oprah Winfrey, not Pope Benedict XVI, but moot. He received 16,794,368 votes and an average influence rating of 90 (out of a possible 100).
Can we also assume what I asserted? That perhaps AOL users might have an anti-Obama bias, and that there's a pretty surly crowd of millions of others out there?That was a previous poll. What about this one? Shall we assume the same thing is happening, or is my original conclusion probably more reasonable? Or maybe, a combination of the two?
We can assume that certain sites are sending out links for members to vote, yes. It happens with all polls of this type.
uh, no, you can not "easily" change your IP addressI tried it and wasn't able to. I can try from a separate location tomorrow?
If someone was really that bored and had the skills, then they could easily change their IP address or whatever need be to vote twice. However, it's not even about voting more than once. That's a small fish in a large ocean in this case.
Can we also assume what I asserted? That perhaps AOL users might have an anti-Obama bias, and that there's a pretty surly crowd of millions of others out there?
I can! Two mouse clicks brotha!uh, no, you can not "easily" change your IP addressI tried it and wasn't able to. I can try from a separate location tomorrow?
If someone was really that bored and had the skills, then they could easily change their IP address or whatever need be to vote twice. However, it's not even about voting more than once. That's a small fish in a large ocean in this case.
so, you've proved that obamabots do vote in pollsThat was a previous poll. What about this one? Shall we assume the same thing is happening, or is my original conclusion probably more reasonable? Or maybe, a combination of the two?
We can assume that certain sites are sending out links for members to vote, yes. It happens with all polls of this type.
Take a look at this, which is exhibit A in that internet polls should not be trusted.
The Beauty of Internet: 4Chan Founder Sweeps Time's Most Influential List
Remember, it’s not Barack Obama, not Oprah Winfrey, not Pope Benedict XVI, but moot. He received 16,794,368 votes and an average influence rating of 90 (out of a possible 100).
4chan is popular, but not that popular.
Who Are the World's Most Influential People in 2009? - The 2009 TIME 100 Finalists - TIME
Look at the difference between 1st and 2nd. And what the first letter of the first 21 spell out.
I've been trying to say we both are.there IS a crowd of millions of surly people who don't like Obama, regardless of whether Robert or Midnight is correct.
so, you've proved that obamabots do vote in polls
I've been trying to say we both are.there IS a crowd of millions of surly people who don't like Obama, regardless of whether Robert or Midnight is correct.
However:
The surly group I am referring to is the vast majority of indys and moderates, who voted FOR Obama and now are having serious buyer's remorse.
Why would anyone want to be on that?If you know anything about 4chan, then you know they aren't obamabots. They hate black people and call them the N word constantly. Have you ever actually been on 4chan?
Why would anyone want to be on that?
Why would anyone want to be on that?
It's the same reason people want to see a car accident up close.
I'm not really sure whether most of the people are racist or just act it. Currently they got a thread up about how Muslims are going to take over Europe in less than 40 years.
