Criticism of Israel is NOT Anti-Semitism

[Phoenall]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

 

[montelatici]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

 

[Roudy]

Do you mean that Ukrainians cannot be against Russian nationalism of the people in the East of Ukraine? Do you mean that Palestinians cannot be against an ideology that evicted them from their homes? What an extraordinary notion. Demonstrates how delusional these zionutters are.

O.K., Nostrodamus, what is your definition of anti-Zionist and remember, the subject is about Jews.

I thought the subject was about criticism of Israel, not Jewish people?

Same thing isn't it, just as criticism of Palestinians is also criticism of ISLAMONAZI TERRORISTS

No such thing in either example; not all Jewish people are Israelis as not all Israelis are Jewish. Criticising the regime and it's ideology is legitimate. The same can be said for Palestinians; not all Palestinians are Islamist extremists or Muslim freedom fighters, just as not all Islamist extremists, etc. are Palestinians.

Oh goody, over stating the obvious. Like saying not all muslims are arabs but most arabs are muslim. Behavior not understood, not within the social norms of the rest of the world, sometimes outside the norms and teachings of Islam. Hate taught, incited to violence under the guise of Islam. We all know this.
Criticism of that behavior it turned around to become an accusation of Islam-phobia to bring other muslims to the support, or against the critics, widening a rift. Any criticism of a muslim become a hate crime, even though the reason for the criticism is behavior that is not true islamic but a misuse of the faith. No one is supposed to criticize, satire, question of intellectually attack a muslim or islam, no matter how incorrect the actions or words being targeted. They even tried to go to the UN to make is criminal to criticize or question a muslim or islam even what wrong. It is creating an attitude of inequality. Non-muslims should be silenced and follow what muslims tell them. They should become subservient. "Muslims are always right, non-muslims are always wrong"
Muslims can do what ever they want and everyone else should be silent and let them.

A purple mad man can commit crimes and go on murder sprees because he is purple. The fact that he is insane does not matter and no one is allowed to criticize or stop him.
A tiger become a man killer but no one can kill or capture him become he is endangered, so it wrecks havoc and continues to kill its way through young and old, from village to village.
A magic shield of protection of a group no matter how anormal or horrific the subset or individual behaves. How is this logical? How do we protect the rest of society?

Only Muslims are allowed to criticize, ridicule, and satire non Muslims, and go on killing sprees against the infidels.

 

[Roudy]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Meh...the illegal Arab invasion of the land was observed and noted by British officials in the Mandate as well as Arab rulers. There simply was no infrastructure in place to record the vast numbers of Arabs flocking into the region, nor was there any interest in the investment in setting it up. After all, the land was conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans, and it was designated as the future Jewish state, so it didn't really matter, the British were on their way out.

 

[montelatici]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Meh...the illegal Arab invasion of the land was observed and noted by British officials in the Mandate as well as Arab rulers. There simply was no infrastructure in place to record the vast numbers of Arabs flocking into the region, nor was there any interest in the investment in setting it up. After all, the land was conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans, and it was designated as the future Jewish state, so it didn't really matter, the British were on their way out.

Nope, the report is clear it concludes that there was substantial Jew immigration and insignificant non-Jewish immigration to Palestine. And, the report was American as well as British and was published by the United States Department of State.

Sorry that the facts don't jive with your propaganda. In fact, the report addresses this propaganda directly. Amazing isn't it. The Anglo-American committee understood how the Zionists, like Ruddy, would try to twist the facts.

and

A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Pages 211 and 212 of volume 1.

 

[Roudy]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Meh...the illegal Arab invasion of the land was observed and noted by British officials in the Mandate as well as Arab rulers. There simply was no infrastructure in place to record the vast numbers of Arabs flocking into the region, nor was there any interest in the investment in setting it up. After all, the land was conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans, and it was designated as the future Jewish state, so it didn't really matter, the British were on their way out.

Nope, the report is clear it concludes that there was substantial Jew immigration and insignificant non-Jewish immigration to Palestine. And, the report was American as well as British and was published by the United States Department of State.

Sorry that the facts don't jive with your propaganda. In fact, the report addresses this propaganda directly. Amazing isn't it. The Anglo-American committee understood how the Zionists, like Ruddy, would try to twist the facts.

View attachment 36781

and

View attachment 36782

A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Pages 211 and 212 of volume 1.

Report? People can't keep track of illegals today, with all the modern technology and advanced techniques. You want the British with a temporary govt. Established in territory they conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans to have had such a system in place? Ha ha ha. Get over it.

Besides, the land was designated to become The future Jewish state. You can quote all the bogus numbers and propoganda you want. It really doesn't matter, the Arab invaders had no say. Just like they had no say when the Ottomans conquered the region and controlled it for 700 years. Period, end of story.

 

[montelatici]

I know, the facts are difficult to swallow after all the propaganda you have been force fed. But the facts are there for everyone to see, unfortunately for you and the other ZioNazis.

Not only did the Christians and Muslims have a say, the British agreed with them and advised the Jews that the Christians and Muslims had those rights. This was in one of the letters between the British, The Palestinian Delegation and the Zionist Organization:

(By the way, it would do you good to read some factual source documentation rather than constantly making things up.)

"The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned, are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917. Unauthorised statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at the meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organisation, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of the peoples an undisturbed national development........Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status.

- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

 

[Roudy]

I know, the facts are difficult to swallow after all the propaganda you have been force fed. But the facts are there for everyone to see, unfortunately for you and the other ZioNazis.

Not only did the Christians and Muslims have a say, the British agreed with them and advised the Jews that the Christians and Muslims had those rights. This was in one of the letters between the British, The Palestinian Delegation and the Zionist Organization:

(By the way, it would do you good to read some factual source documentation rather than constantly making things up.)

"The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned, are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917. Unauthorised statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at the meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organisation, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of the peoples an undisturbed national development........Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status.

- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

Hah? Get your head out of your ass. The land was to be the future Homeland for the Jews. Just as Arab Palestine aka Jordan was going to be for Arabs. Jewish Palestine was going to be governed and ruled by Jews. That is the definition of statehood you friggin idiot. Arabs knew what was about to happen and failed to prevent it.

"It was going to be the Homeland for the Jews but not the Jewish state." Ha ha ha. You're just making up ridiculous shit now..typical IslamoNazi historical revisionism.

 

[montelatici]

The way you spout the propaganda shows you were well trained by your handlers, but the facts are the facts. The source documentation clearly shows that Jordan had nothing to do with Palestine territorially, a separate section in the Reports of The Mandatory was established for Trans-Jordan. To wit:

X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.

Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania. It is bounded on the north by the frontier of Syria, placed under the mandate of France; on the south by the kingdom of the Hejaz; and on the west by the line of the Jordan and the Dead Sea; while on the east it stretches into the desert and ends--the boundary is not yet defined--where Mesopotamia begins. Trans-Jordania has a population of probably 350,000 people. It contains a few small towns and large areas of fertile land, producing excellent wheat and barley. The people are partly settled townsmen and agriculturists, partly wandering Bedouin; the latter, however, cultivate areas, more or less fixed, during certain seasons of the year.

When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania. I proceeded to the central town of Salt on August 20th, and, at an assembly of notables and sheikhs of the district, announced that His Majesty's Government favoured the establishment of a system of local self- government, assisted by a small number of British officers as advisers.

- See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921




Your reading comprehension is limited, but even you can understand what the British intended:

"They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine "

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

 

[Lipush]

It is unfair.
It doesn't mean that you're denying the Holocaust ever happened. Please, stop throwing this word around whenever someone accuses Israel of war crimes, questions it's legitimacy etc as I think it's also offensive to the people who actually lost their lives in the Holocaust. Just my Opinion.

Please.

Most of the Israeli criticizers ARE antisemitic. They hide their Jew hatred behind "anti-Zionism" because it's not politically correct to hate Jews anymore, just for being Jews. Many people are clever enough to see behind the mask, though. Is it always antisemitism? No. But I'd say most of the time, it is.

 

[Lipush]

And yet we can't criticize palatine for their violent actions against Israel? Kind of one sided.

Excuse me dingle berry, Palestine is THEIR LAND, the zionists are the invaders.

Funny, considered that word "Palestine" actually means "INVADER" in Hebrew, while "Zion" is the original name of Jerusalem given by the people of Israel.

Kind of like kattle and pot and black thingy.

 

[montelatici]

Palestine is derived from the Greek word Παλαιστίνη adopted and Latinized by the Romans into Palaestina.

 

[Roudy]

The way you spout the propaganda shows you were well trained by your handlers, but the facts are the facts. The source documentation clearly shows that Jordan had nothing to do with Palestine territorially, a separate section in the Reports of The Mandatory was established for Trans-Jordan. To wit:

X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.

Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania. It is bounded on the north by the frontier of Syria, placed under the mandate of France; on the south by the kingdom of the Hejaz; and on the west by the line of the Jordan and the Dead Sea; while on the east it stretches into the desert and ends--the boundary is not yet defined--where Mesopotamia begins. Trans-Jordania has a population of probably 350,000 people. It contains a few small towns and large areas of fertile land, producing excellent wheat and barley. The people are partly settled townsmen and agriculturists, partly wandering Bedouin; the latter, however, cultivate areas, more or less fixed, during certain seasons of the year.

When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania. I proceeded to the central town of Salt on August 20th, and, at an assembly of notables and sheikhs of the district, announced that His Majesty's Government favoured the establishment of a system of local self- government, assisted by a small number of British officers as advisers.

- See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921




Your reading comprehension is limited, but even you can understand what the British intended:

"They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine "

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

In 1921, Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill severed nearly four-fifths of Palestine—some 35,000 square miles—to create a brand new Arab entity, Transjordan. As a consolation prize for the Hejaz and Arabia (which are both now Saudi Arabia) going to the Saud family, Churchill rewarded Sherif Hussein’s son Abdullah for his contribution to the war against Turkey by installing him as Transjordan’s emir.

 

[Roudy]

Palestine is derived from the Greek word Παλαιστίνη adopted and Latinized by the Romans into Palaestina.

Funny. "Palestine" was such an established historical name, even the Ottomans didn't call it by that name for 700 years when it belonged to them. They called it Southern Syria.

Palestine, an invented name for an invented people.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

It is unfair.
It doesn't mean that you're denying the Holocaust ever happened. Please, stop throwing this word around whenever someone accuses Israel of war crimes, questions it's legitimacy etc as I think it's also offensive to the people who actually lost their lives in the Holocaust. Just my Opinion.

In theory, one can criticize Israel and not be an anti-semite. And by criticize, I pretty well mean detest. But I have yet to see that happen. Just my Experience.

 

[Challenger]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Meh...the illegal Arab invasion of the land was observed and noted by British officials in the Mandate as well as Arab rulers. There simply was no infrastructure in place to record the vast numbers of Arabs flocking into the region, nor was there any interest in the investment in setting it up. After all, the land was conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans, and it was designated as the future Jewish state, so it didn't really matter, the British were on their way out.

Nope, the report is clear it concludes that there was substantial Jew immigration and insignificant non-Jewish immigration to Palestine. And, the report was American as well as British and was published by the United States Department of State.

Sorry that the facts don't jive with your propaganda. In fact, the report addresses this propaganda directly. Amazing isn't it. The Anglo-American committee understood how the Zionists, like Ruddy, would try to twist the facts.

View attachment 36781

and

View attachment 36782

A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Pages 211 and 212 of volume 1.

Report? People can't keep track of illegals today, with all the modern technology and advanced techniques. You want the British with a temporary govt. Established in territory they conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans to have had such a system in place? Ha ha ha. Get over it.

Besides, the land was designated to become The future Jewish state. You can quote all the bogus numbers and propoganda you want. It really doesn't matter, the Arab invaders had no say. Just like they had no say when the Ottomans conquered the region and controlled it for 700 years. Period, end of story.

It was actually a lot easier then as there was not so much in the way of the transport infrastructure we have now, even in a "modern" society you could go through a whole day without seeing a car or truck in the 1920's and 30's. Illegal immigrants had limited means of entry and these were usually under military, police or customs surveillance. There was undoubtedly some bribery and corruption to allow Illegal immigrants in, especially when it came to over quota European Jewish immigrants, but it is generally accepted that the British censuses of 1922 and 1931 provide the most reliable figures.

No. "...the establishment IN Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"

A national home (tellingly, not THE national home) for the Jewish people was to be facilitated IN Palestine. At no point did the British promise the whole, or any part for that matter, of Palestine as a Jewish "state". This is just Zionist fantasy.

Zionist historiography likes to portray a mass Arab migration into Palestine but this is largely a myth. In the 7th century CE when the Arabs conquered Byzantine Palestine and Syria and Sassanian Mesopotamia, the Arab "elites" expelled the Byzantine "elites" from Palestine and took over their houses and estates. The "common" people were left alone and what Arab migration there was, was channelled towards southern Mesopotamia (Iraq) and Persia (Iran). The local Christian population, in Palestine became “Arabised” over the succeeding centuries, when Arabic replaced Greek as the official language, even Judaism was abandoned and almost died out until Nahmanides turned up and sparked a rebirth of the religion in the area. Two books well worth the read on the subject:

Empire and Elites after the Muslim Conquest The Transformation of Northern Mesopotamia Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization Amazon.co.uk Chase F. Robinson 9780521028738 Books

The Great Arab Conquests How The Spread Of Islam Changed The World We Live In Amazon.co.uk Hugh Kennedy 9780753823897 Books

For those that want an objective view from academic sources.

 

[Phoenall]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

You mean hundreds don't you, and not thousands. WHY DO YOU HAVE TO LIE WHEN THE EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE .

So if I use your link to discredit your posts does this mean that your posts are also bullshit ?


Do you mean the demographics of Palestine that show the arab muslims always had the upper hand and increased their number above the level of any other impoverished disease ridden 3rd world culture. Most managing to break even or increase at less that 1%. Your link shows an increase in the arab muslim population from 1922 to 1941 of 472,100, and for the arab Christians of 64,083. A total of 536,183, the Jews increased by a much smaller figure of 117,226 mostly from invited legal immigration. Destroys your demographics baloney doesn't it as the arab muslims always had the numbers to wipe out the Jews from the end of WW1. It also shows that the numbers expelled cant be correct as this would mean the arab muslims had doubled in population size in less than 8 years.
See how your links when used correctly destroy all your claims, or show that you are deliberately lying about the facts because you have been told to.

 

[Phoenall]

View attachment 36764

Just shows the legal immigrants that should have only ever been Jews, the booklet refuses to give numbers for ILLEGAL ARAB MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS because they were so high. And Winston Churchill disagreed with these findings in the House of Commons calling the authors LIARS. He should know being a Minister in His Majesties Government at the time.

A work of thousands of pages in three volumes is not a "booklet".

The Survey does, in fact, make a clear statement on the sources of population growth for the three religious groups. It is on page 140 of Volume 1, which clearly states that Muslim and Christian increases were from natural growth and the Jewish increase was due to immigration.

View attachment 36769

As usual you can go to the Berman Jewish Policy Archives at NYU/Wagner universities to confirm this fact. Remember page 140, volume 1. You see, Phoney, unlike you I have the facts behind everyone of my assertions. All you do is bullshit, constantly bullshit.
A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Meh...the illegal Arab invasion of the land was observed and noted by British officials in the Mandate as well as Arab rulers. There simply was no infrastructure in place to record the vast numbers of Arabs flocking into the region, nor was there any interest in the investment in setting it up. After all, the land was conquered after a grueling war with the Germans and Ottomans, and it was designated as the future Jewish state, so it didn't really matter, the British were on their way out.

Nope, the report is clear it concludes that there was substantial Jew immigration and insignificant non-Jewish immigration to Palestine. And, the report was American as well as British and was published by the United States Department of State.

Sorry that the facts don't jive with your propaganda. In fact, the report addresses this propaganda directly. Amazing isn't it. The Anglo-American committee understood how the Zionists, like Ruddy, would try to twist the facts.

View attachment 36781

and

View attachment 36782

A Survey of Palestine Volume 1 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner

Pages 211 and 212 of volume 1.

The high rate of increase could not be achieved when the population growth of the surrounding area was at less than 1%, why did the arab muslims of Palestine produce more children and increase the population while the surrounding areas arab muslims were reducing as deaths overtook births. The only answer was the arab muslims were moving to Palestine illegally because the Jews were an easy touch.

 

[Phoenall]

I know, the facts are difficult to swallow after all the propaganda you have been force fed. But the facts are there for everyone to see, unfortunately for you and the other ZioNazis.

Not only did the Christians and Muslims have a say, the British agreed with them and advised the Jews that the Christians and Muslims had those rights. This was in one of the letters between the British, The Palestinian Delegation and the Zionist Organization:

(By the way, it would do you good to read some factual source documentation rather than constantly making things up.)

"The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned, are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917. Unauthorised statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at the meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organisation, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of the peoples an undisturbed national development........Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status.

- See more at: UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

And why do you ignore the facts that are unpleasant to muslims and try and put 2015 laws in place of 1920 laws. The rights of arab muslims and Christians were different in 1920 to what they are today, and the Jews did not have to give them anything they did not want to. But the Jewish declaration of independence spelt out what they could expect and what they had to do to achieve it. All this in line with the MANDATE words of not interfering with their political rights of 1921.

 

[Phoenall]

The way you spout the propaganda shows you were well trained by your handlers, but the facts are the facts. The source documentation clearly shows that Jordan had nothing to do with Palestine territorially, a separate section in the Reports of The Mandatory was established for Trans-Jordan. To wit:

X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.

Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania. It is bounded on the north by the frontier of Syria, placed under the mandate of France; on the south by the kingdom of the Hejaz; and on the west by the line of the Jordan and the Dead Sea; while on the east it stretches into the desert and ends--the boundary is not yet defined--where Mesopotamia begins. Trans-Jordania has a population of probably 350,000 people. It contains a few small towns and large areas of fertile land, producing excellent wheat and barley. The people are partly settled townsmen and agriculturists, partly wandering Bedouin; the latter, however, cultivate areas, more or less fixed, during certain seasons of the year.

When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania. I proceeded to the central town of Salt on August 20th, and, at an assembly of notables and sheikhs of the district, announced that His Majesty's Government favoured the establishment of a system of local self- government, assisted by a small number of British officers as advisers.

- See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921




Your reading comprehension is limited, but even you can understand what the British intended:

"They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine "

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization British policy in Palestine Churchill White Paper - UK documentation Cmd. 1700 Non-UN document excerpts 1 July 1922

You forget that the original mandate included what is Jordan as part of the Jewish National Home, and it was the ANSTI SEMITIC British that had the LoN change the mandate to give that land to the arab muslims. The proviso was that the arab muslims in Jewish Palestine were to be relocated in Jordan by force if necessary. The intention was for A RESURECTED JEWISH NATIONAL HOME IN PALESTINE based on the words of the Balfour declaration and the terms of the Mandate.