Court Reverses Ruling Against Trump Sanctuary Policy. Winning!

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Court Rules Trump Admin Can Withhold Federal Grants to NYC, Seven States over Sanctuary Policies | National Review
Does it make sense that the president of the U.S. could not withhold money to states actively violating federal immigration law?
It did to a lower court leftist stooge. That judge has been over ruled and properly chastised.
This opens the way for the Trump administration to begin to limit funds to states that are waging a war on
federal immigration policies and sticking their foot in the door letting countless illegal immigrants into the nation.

With a global pandemic on the horizon this ruling has special meaning as now keeping our borders secure will be more important than ever.

 

[Jackson]

Excellent news!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Fantastic. Love it!

 

[S.J.]

A lot more of these rulings by Obama appointed judges will be overturned as they wind their way through the courts. It's unfortunate that we have to waste all that time and money when activist judges ignore the Constitution and make ridiculous rulings but that's what happens when we elect subversives like Obama (or any other Democrat).

 

[ColonelAngus]

Such good news for America.

 

[MAGAman]

Such good news for America.

And therefore bad news for Democrats.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Such good news for America.

And therefore bad news for Democrats.

Isn’t it weird how that works?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The media may not want to cover this issue but they sure won't be able to ignore it when Trump starts to punish
sanctuary cities and states that thumb their nose at the law.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The media may not want to cover this issue but they sure won't be able to ignore it when Trump starts to punish
sanctuary cities and states that thumb their nose at the law.

It is way past time for Trump to start using the Hammer of Justice on these cretinous political machines.

 

[Jackson]

The media may not want to cover this issue but they sure won't be able to ignore it when Trump starts to punish
sanctuary cities and states that thumb their nose at the law.

It isn't "punishing" sanctuary cities, it's seeing that the Federal laws are followed in each state.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

It isn't "punishing" sanctuary cities, it's seeing that the Federal laws are followed in each state.

Word games. It's hitting the left in the pocket book making them much more likely to follow federal laws.

I doubt leftist ideologues will stop illegal sanctuary policies but each blow to the socialist left have a cumulative effect.

 

[Jackson]

It isn't "punishing" sanctuary cities, it's seeing that the Federal laws are followed in each state.

Word games. It's hitting the left in the pocket book making them much more likely to follow federal laws.

I doubt leftist ideologues will stop illegal sanctuary policies but each blow to the socialist left have a cumulative effect.

If they don't follow the law, there will be consequences.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Democrat voters headed south...

U.S. court allows Trump to phase out immigrant humanitarian protections

A U.S. appeals court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump over his administration's decision to end humanitarian protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants, many of whom have lived in the United States for decades.

www.reuters.com

 

[busybee01]

Court Rules Trump Admin Can Withhold Federal Grants to NYC, Seven States over Sanctuary Policies | National Review
Does it make sense that the president of the U.S. could not withhold money to states actively violating federal immigration law?
It did to a lower court leftist stooge. That judge has been over ruled and properly chastised.
This opens the way for the Trump administration to begin to limit funds to states that are waging a war on
federal immigration policies and sticking their foot in the door letting countless illegal immigrants into the nation.

With a global pandemic on the horizon this ruling has special meaning as now keeping our borders secure will be more important than ever.

Yes it does. The Congress has to approve such restrictions. It is something called the Constitution which gives Congress the power of the purse.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Yes it does. The Congress has to approve such restrictions. It is something called the Constitution which gives Congress the power of the purse.

Maybe you should read the opinion of the court before popping off.