I for one, couldn't open it.
Look a crap link that confirms nothing.
Just like I anticipated.
Thank you for not deviating from the script.
The link proved you wrong........so now it is crap?
How shallow of you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I for one, couldn't open it.
Look a crap link that confirms nothing.
Just like I anticipated.
Thank you for not deviating from the script.
The link proved you wrong........so now it is crap?
How shallow of you
I for one, couldn't open it.Look a crap link that confirms nothing.
Just like I anticipated.
Thank you for not deviating from the script.
The link proved you wrong........so now it is crap?
How shallow of you
You have absolutely no proof of that.
Nope, common sense would tell us that if he was 6"3, he wasn't 160.
It's just part of the story from the media of the innocent black kid that was killed in cold blood by the white.
Why did we need to know about the candy and Ice tea? To portray innocence
Why did they show a picture of him when he 12 all over the media? To portray innocence
When I was in High School, I was 6'3" and weighed 140
Nope, common sense would tell us that if he was 6"3, he wasn't 160.
It's just part of the story from the media of the innocent black kid that was killed in cold blood by the white.
Why did we need to know about the candy and Ice tea? To portray innocence
Why did they show a picture of him when he 12 all over the media? To portray innocence
When I was in High School, I was 6'3" and weighed 140
When was that, last week?
Nope, common sense would tell us that if he was 6"3, he wasn't 160.
It's just part of the story from the media of the innocent black kid that was killed in cold blood by the white.
Why did we need to know about the candy and Ice tea? To portray innocence
Why did they show a picture of him when he 12 all over the media? To portray innocence
When I was in High School, I was 6'3" and weighed 140
When was that, last week?
I couldn't open the link.
Zimmerman, and the hard RW defenders of the Trayvon Martin killer has been claiming and moaning on and on and on, the bogus claim that Zimmerman got his head bashed in by the murdered victim, Trayvon Martin. They've been regurgitating the BOGUS claim that Zimmerman got his nose broken. All without a SINGLE, SOLITARY, SHRED of proof nor evidence corroborating that claim. Other than the alleged word of the killer, George Zimmerman.
Well now we have PROOF that shows, what all the thinking people and unbiased people knew all along, that he lied...he didn't have a scratch on him.
Behold...
Trayvon Martin Case: Exclusive Surveillance Video of George Zimmerman - ABC News
As you can see in the VIDEO, the SURVEILLANCE VIDEO, Zimmerman is walking as a healthy man, not a scratch, not even evidence of blood, no black eye and certainly no broken nose.
How do you righties explain this away now?
Why did he claim his head was banged in on the concrete? Why did he CLAIM he had a broken nose?
The man was lying, is lying and will continue to lie about the events to get himself out of trouble. What else is he lying about if he's willing to lie about such a basic and fundamental aspect of this case? Anyone that wants to defend him at this point is in league with a known killer.
I can't wait to see the hard RW flips and spin on this.
Boy that sure is a lotta coincidences huh?What do you think the tape was tampered with to show?Zimmerman hasn't been arrested on the basis of the tape, because there is some evidence of fiddling with the tape. The date/time stamp shows signs of alteration.
And why?
That is, why it was tampered with?
Who's to gain from it being tampered with?
My answer to the last question is the bumbling police department.
I don't know. I just saw it this morning a statement that the time/date stamp is being examined because there is some indication that it might have been tampered with. If someone interested in tampering found a video of a man who superficially resembled Zimmerman could they have altered the date and time stamp to make it look like it was on the date in question when it was weeks before? Would there be some incentive to do that?
We were already given a picture of a 12 year old Trayvon Martin purporing to be recent. What else is being misrepresented?
So the witnesses who say that Trayvon was on top of him knocking the crap out of him, and he was screaming for help...and the 911 calls through which you can hear him screaming for help right up to the sound of the shot...and the cops who said his injuries and state of dishevelment were consistent with his statement...
ALL those are lies? On the strength of a grainy, obstructed, 50 seconds or so of video shot from above his head somewhere?
Really?
In order for your supposed facts to be true would require that at least 2 officers are lying, 2 eye witnesses are lying, the EMTS are lying, the 911 call was faked..... getting the drift yet dumb ass?So the witnesses who say that Trayvon was on top of him knocking the crap out of him, and he was screaming for help...and the 911 calls through which you can hear him screaming for help right up to the sound of the shot...and the cops who said his injuries and state of dishevelment were consistent with his statement...
ALL those are lies? On the strength of a grainy, obstructed, 50 seconds or so of video shot from above his head somewhere?
Really?
ROTFLMBAO!!!!!
Too funny!
Glad you asked..
In fact, there are records of the phone call to his girlfriends phone. It shows how long it lasted and shows it ending one minute before the shot was fired.
So, here we have a boy who is plotting a stealth attack on a larger man but insists on talking to his girlfriend during the attack
Where?
And is there a transcript? Do we have the testimony of the girl?
Link it.
From what I heard, the police haven't even interviewed the girl yet. You want a transcript of their conversation? Do you get transcripts of your phone calls?
In order for your supposed facts to be true would require that at least 2 officers are lying, 2 eye witnesses are lying, the EMTS are lying, the 911 call was faked..... getting the drift yet dumb ass?So the witnesses who say that Trayvon was on top of him knocking the crap out of him, and he was screaming for help...and the 911 calls through which you can hear him screaming for help right up to the sound of the shot...and the cops who said his injuries and state of dishevelment were consistent with his statement...
ALL those are lies? On the strength of a grainy, obstructed, 50 seconds or so of video shot from above his head somewhere?
Really?
ROTFLMBAO!!!!!
Too funny!
Zimmerman, and the hard RW defenders of the Trayvon Martin killer has been claiming and moaning on and on and on, the bogus claim that Zimmerman got his head bashed in by the murdered victim, Trayvon Martin. They've been regurgitating the BOGUS claim that Zimmerman got his nose broken. All without a SINGLE, SOLITARY, SHRED of proof nor evidence corroborating that claim. Other than the alleged word of the killer, George Zimmerman.
Well now we have PROOF that shows, what all the thinking people and unbiased people knew all along, that he lied...he didn't have a scratch on him.
Behold...
Trayvon Martin Case: Exclusive Surveillance Video of George Zimmerman - ABC News
As you can see in the VIDEO, the SURVEILLANCE VIDEO, Zimmerman is walking as a healthy man, not a scratch, not even evidence of blood, no black eye and certainly no broken nose.
How do you righties explain this away now?
Why did he claim his head was banged in on the concrete? Why did he CLAIM he had a broken nose?
The man was lying, is lying and will continue to lie about the events to get himself out of trouble. What else is he lying about if he's willing to lie about such a basic and fundamental aspect of this case? Anyone that wants to defend him at this point is in league with a known killer.
I can't wait to see the hard RW flips and spin on this.
Awww....!Barry44sucks said:Hi, you have received -55 reputation points from Barry44sucks.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Racist piece of shit.
Regards,
Barry44sucks
Note: This is an automated message.
Who said anything about a trial being problematic?First of all, George Zimmerman isn't a right winger so stop pretending that he is. He's a registered Democrat for God's sake!
Secondly...what does that video supposedly show? That Zimmerman wasn't bleeding? If he were treated at the scene by EMT's should it suprise anyone that he wasn't bleeding by the time he got to the police station? Does anyone know how much of a time lapse there was between the shooting and when that video was taken? It was raining that night and Zimmerman was outside. Does he look wet in that video? By your logic...that means he wasn't out in the rain?
What's the problem with a trial then?
Duke Lacrosse Part Deux.....
Screw the investigation, skip the trial, let's go straight to the execution.