Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read

[bripat9643]

Let all Americans read the unredacted Mueller report. What is there to hide from us? Everybody is innocent, right?

~~~~~~
If Congress wants to change the law they have written allowing the Mueller Report to be presented unredacted and showing no protection for those brought before grand juries. ITMT the Mueller report redacted to protect citizens has been made available to the public and a lesser redacted version has been submitted to Congress under SCIF.

I can see why redactions are necessary in the version of the report made public, so long as the rules were followed. However, the full report must be presented to Congress together with the underlying evidence.

Congress isn't entitled to see the full report. Barr would be breaking the law if he released it to them.

 

[Doc7505]

Let all Americans read the unredacted Mueller report. What is there to hide from us? Everybody is innocent, right?

~~~~~~
If Congress wants to change the law they have written allowing the Mueller Report to be presented unredacted and showing no protection for those brought before grand juries. ITMT the Mueller report redacted to protect citizens has been made available to the public and a lesser redacted version has been submitted to Congress under SCIF.

I can see why redactions are necessary in the version of the report made public, so long as the rules were followed. However, the full report must be presented to Congress together with the underlying evidence.

~~~~~~
I've read parts of the Mueller report and it does use attachments to support the investigation and evidence thereof.

 

[BULLDOG]

You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

 

[westwall]

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

That's true, but unlike your unsubstantiated BS, there actually IS evidence to support the claim of a coup attempt.

So sad for you.

 

[iceberg]

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

but crazy left wingers doing it is good enough.

got it.

 

[BULLDOG]

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

That's true, but unlike your unsubstantiated BS, there actually IS evidence to support the claim of a coup attempt.

So sad for you.

Yes, Rush said so, and that's backed up by Hannity. I guess that's good enough for crazy right wingers.

 

[westwall]

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

That's true, but unlike your unsubstantiated BS, there actually IS evidence to support the claim of a coup attempt.

So sad for you.

Yes, Rush said so, and that's backed up by Hannity. I guess that's good enough for crazy right wingers.

I don't listen to them so i will have to accept your account of what they say, I am merely relying on evidence that has been written in the WAPO and NYT. Also some BBC reporting as well.

 

[WEATHER53]

More emotional flying off the handle as Barr found in contempt by Kangaroo.

 

[Muhammed]

Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read​

Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.

You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.

Ooh, you said TDS. And another Demon gets it's Horns. Are they really going to make a Christmas Movie about this? Sorry Jimmy Stewart is not available to star in it.

The complete lack of evidence is very conspicuous , jackass.

So how long have you been afflicted with TDS, jackass?

 

[WEATHER53]

You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.

Ooh, you said TDS. And another Demon gets it's Horns. Are they really going to make a Christmas Movie about this? Sorry Jimmy Stewart is not available to star in it.

The complete lack of evidence is very conspicuous , jackass.

So how long have you been afflicted with TDS, jackass?

This began when public schooling became about comfort rather than education, sheltered from opinions and experiences that made them uncomfortable, they never learned how to accept, adapt and thrive.
Participation Bullshit did not help either. Shuffling off to school in bedroom slippers, pajamas and hair uncombed for a week does not bring about the maturational changes that are necessary for life.

 

[Crepitus]

Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.

Idiots often disagree with me.

Why would your fellow conservatives disagree with you?

I'm not a conservative, you derpy jackass party of slavery supporter.

Then why do you act like one?

Howso?

Please elaborate.

Otherwise you are full of shit, slimeball.

Lol, look at your own posting history kid!

 

[Crepitus]

You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."​

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
​

Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.​

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.

Eisenhower? That would mean those men would have to be well into their 90s. I was born during the last days of the Eisenhower administration and I will soon be 59 years old. I think they might be just a little senile at that age.

How about the ones from bush jr and Sr?

 

[Muhammed]

Idiots often disagree with me.

Why would your fellow conservatives disagree with you?

I'm not a conservative, you derpy jackass party of slavery supporter.

Then why do you act like one?

Howso?

Please elaborate.

Otherwise you are full of shit, slimeball.

Lol, look at your own posting history kid!

Your concession is accepted.

 

[bripat9643]

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."​

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
​

Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.​

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.

Eisenhower? That would mean those men would have to be well into their 90s. I was born during the last days of the Eisenhower administration and I will soon be 59 years old. I think they might be just a little senile at that age.

How about the ones from bush jr and Sr?

Establishment Never-Trump hacks.

 

[skye]

This is total madness, Congress wanting to hold Barr in contempt for NOT breaking the law!

What a circus this has become.

This is a sickening thing to watch.

 

[BULLDOG]

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."​

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
​

Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.​

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.

Eisenhower? That would mean those men would have to be well into their 90s. I was born during the last days of the Eisenhower administration and I will soon be 59 years old. I think they might be just a little senile at that age.

How about the ones from bush jr and Sr?

Establishment Never-Trump hacks.

You say that as if there was some sort of meaning to it.

 

[leftwinger]

500+ EX-PROSECUTORS: TRUMP’s LUCKY HE WASN’T CHARGED

Trump Would Have Been Charged With Obstruction If He Weren’t President

The list is growing.

And he would have lost the election if not for the electoral college you 55gal drum of human garbage. But they do, and he is.

You bring shame to real America, and i bet you stink.

 

[BULLDOG]

500+ EX-PROSECUTORS: TRUMP’s LUCKY HE WASN’T CHARGED

Trump Would Have Been Charged With Obstruction If He Weren’t President

The list is growing.

Somewhere around 700 now.

 

[bripat9643]

How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."​

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
​

Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.​

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.

Eisenhower? That would mean those men would have to be well into their 90s. I was born during the last days of the Eisenhower administration and I will soon be 59 years old. I think they might be just a little senile at that age.

How about the ones from bush jr and Sr?

Establishment Never-Trump hacks.

You say that as if there was some sort of meaning to it.

You know exactly what it means, douchebag,

 

[bripat9643]

They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president

The key words that libtards keep ignoring is "if he were not President". There are specific powers granted by the Constitution to the President, and he never did any of those things anyway!

Nobody is above the law.

~~~~~~
If that is the case, why haven't Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Koskinen, Lois Lerner, Lynch Comey, McCabe, Priestap, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, Ohr, Obama et al., been held to account and indicted for their criminal acts of sedition, obstruction of Justice?

Because crazy right wingers claiming they are guilty of those things isn't the same as them actually being guilty.

How ironic. What do leftwingers say about Trump?