Christianity more dangerous than Atheism.

[JakeStarkey]

^^^ Ok, then!

 

[badger2]

The argument that Helen Keller was a xian fails to document what she knew before she was coerced, which coercion then becomes a kind of theft. The same theft occurs with the islamic protection rackets: the Uighurs once lived in the same valley the Han call their original homeland, and this before the Uighurs fell under the sway of religious coercion. The Chinese still scapegoat the Uighurs, regardless of their affiliations, a primal knowledge envy as precondition, pretext.

 

[badger2]

For Keller, we linked Alexander Graham Bell (the current Kelly cellphone problem), though Mabel Gardiner Hubbard, Graham's wife, links to much more xian pathology, for example, the Fort Harrison Hotel in Clearwater, Florida.

 

[JakeStarkey]

badger2 have you met Dale Smith, LA RAM FAN, ShootSpeeders, Sicilianthing, and healthmyths?

I will happily facilitate a meeting. No need to thank me.

 

[badger2]

Jake, we've seen La Ram Fan on JFK threads that your rump was not on. Are you afraid to get involved?

 

[badger2]

We will be posting the Southern Bell link to JFK. Hubbard DNA links to Ron Hubbard's Scientology at the Fort Harrison Hotel, Clearwater, Florida. Thus, Alexander's interest in Helen Keller reveals a possible unhealthy relationship. Was he ever allowed to be alone with her?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jake, we've seen La Ram Fan on JFK threads that your rump was not on. Are you afraid to get involved?

Conspiracy threads? Not interested. He stays away from me because I make him look silly every time.

 

[badger2]

Then badger will stay here and make you look stupid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^ Badger has failed.

 

[badger2]

We notice that Starkey's reactions are composed of short, simple sentences. Starkey is correct in showing just where the dangers lie.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^ Short, simple sentences are all that is necessary to refute Badger 2.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Famous Atheist: Mao, Hitler, Stalin

 

[JakeStarkey]

Hitler was Catholic, Stalin was Orthodox, Mao was animist.

Many of the alt right are atheistic.

 

[badger2]

One party, two right wings. (Gore Vidal)

You keep getting screwed by defining the left as anything but movement. There's no need for the prisoners to change this modus when substituting the pathologies of religious belief for political belief.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Constitutional conservatism, Christian dominionism, communism and its flip side libertarianism, and anarchy would be far worse than what we have now.

 

[badger2]

What is it that we have now? How is this defined for what
Starkey glosses over: the concept of the becoming-communist of capitalism. Therefore, we show how Starkey firstly misinterprets the materialist and formalist aspects of constitutional conservatism while in the same breath confounds it with religion, which is a critical mistake:

'Constitutional modifications follow the contemporary maturation of the material conditions of development. The laborist elements of the Constitution can only be raised up and celebrated in the context of this material relationship. These elements contained in the Constitution are indicative of the present nature of the State regime, even if they are aufgehoben with respect to their previous generic definition. This new characterization of the problematic presents us not with a normal rearrangement of the formal elements with respect to their material conditioning, but rather with a problem central to constitutional science: the problem of the relationship between the material foundation and the formal constitution of order. Constitutional science has long been conscious of the centrality of this problem.'
(Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State Form, p. 63)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Badger is arguing for Michael Hardt's philosophical construct that labor becomes the footstool of capitalist oppression. Interesting. I recommend this link for people to come up to speed on him and his philosophies. He's fun if erratic.

Michael Hardt - Wikipedia

 

[badger2]

Thanks for the link.

 

[badger2]

Starkey does what the other automatons do: jump right into subjectivity while not claiming the freedom they had to choose the objective material of the discussion. So it's Helen Keller (the commie) or Michael Hardt (the commie). Starkey fails to engage the concept of the becoming-comunist of capitalism, as if capitalism would never mature into anything different (ex-atheist on Jesus).

 

[JakeStarkey]

badger has trouble that "becoming-communist of capitalism" is an issue on no worth to Americans when talking about Christianity and atheism. Your two examples are the exceptions that prove the rule.