Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

[hadit]

What does the supply/demand curve for unskilled labor look like at $7.25?
What does it look like at $15? What does it look like at $30?

Ask an adult. Get back to me.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

In my case, they're made to do it every year because of the demand for my work. Government regulation is totally unneeded.

 

[OnePercenter]

Which is why you create a shell corporation for $495.00 to discharge the debt.

Cool.
Your shell corporation gonna borrow the money you need to buy a McDonald's franchise?
Tell me more!!!

Shell companies protect assets from claims.

Yup. Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

Again, you can't buy a McDonald's franchise for $475.

I never said you could.

 

[OnePercenter]

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

In my case, they're made to do it every year because of the demand for my work. Government regulation is totally unneeded.

YOU are not everybody.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What does the supply/demand curve for unskilled labor look like at $7.25?
What does it look like at $15? What does it look like at $30?

Ask an adult. Get back to me.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Whether it's revenue or income, a cost is a percent of all the money you make.

What's your tax cost if your income is zero?

Adjusted for tax purposes, or actual?

Both.

Guess

You said it doesn't matter, revenue or income, it's a cost.

There ya go!

Yes, there's your error.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Cool.
Your shell corporation gonna borrow the money you need to buy a McDonald's franchise?
Tell me more!!!

Shell companies protect assets from claims.

Yup. Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

Again, you can't buy a McDonald's franchise for $475.

I never said you could.

Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Thanks for admitting you lied.

 

[OnePercenter]

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

That's what tRumps US Department of Labor says.

From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent

Real Earnings Summary

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

 

[OnePercenter]

Shell companies protect assets from claims.

Yup. Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

Again, you can't buy a McDonald's franchise for $475.

I never said you could.

Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Thanks for admitting you lied.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

Allows millions of illegal aliens to flood the job market.
Expresses shock when low-skilled Americans don't see rising wages.
Blames "employer power".

Ummmm…..if you boot the illegals, you give more power to the employees.

Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too.

You're lying.

That's what tRumps US Department of Labor says.

From May 2017 to May 2018, real average hourly earnings decreased 0.1 percent

Real Earnings Summary

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

US Department of Labor says.

They said that "Employers aren't going to give raises unless they're made too"?
You're lying.
Thanks for the link.

Average hourly earnings increased from $26.21 in May 2017 to $26.92 in May 2018.
What government regulation forced them to do that?

Chicks $17.00/hr was due to regulation.

Which one? Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yup. Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

Again, you can't buy a McDonald's franchise for $475.

I never said you could.

Still need to put assets in to buy things like franchises.

Thanks for admitting you lied.

Again, shell companies exist to protect assets by discharging liabilities.

Again, so what?

 

[danielpalos]

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.

What does the supply/demand curve for unskilled labor look like at $7.25?
What does it look like at $15? What does it look like at $30?

Ask an adult. Get back to me.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

strike one.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

 

[danielpalos]

We don't care if we lose low wage jobs. Social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, by comparison.

Higher paid labor pays more in taxes and creates more in demand.

Double the MW overnight and you'll have more on welfare, and you'll compassion that doesn't pay enough.

In the short run or the long run? Seattle and San Francisco are establishing metrics that gainsay current, accepted dogma. Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.

The right wing has no consistent explanation.

In any Case, in California, for example, we have a Board of Equalization that can stabilize markets not induce chaos in markets. Employers could simply get, Equalized, on the back-end. Employers have accounting departments to help them out.

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.


And you think that proves that a higher MW doesn't harm MW workers? Dude!!

Why should it? More pay and less unemployment.

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

 

[danielpalos]

More pay and less unemployment.

More pay and more unemployment.

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.

What does the supply/demand curve for unskilled labor look like at $7.25?
What does it look like at $15? What does it look like at $30?

Ask an adult. Get back to me.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

Doesn't work anymore. Regulations and regulations alone allow American workers to make a living wage, IE; Chick-fil-A.

Econ 101 No Longer Explains the Job Market

The right wing only has talking points, anyway. Monopsony explains it in jurisdictions where the minimum wage is higher than the national average but the unemployment rate is lower than the national average.

 

[hadit]

Double the MW overnight and you'll have more on welfare, and you'll compassion that doesn't pay enough.

In the short run or the long run? Seattle and San Francisco are establishing metrics that gainsay current, accepted dogma. Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.

The right wing has no consistent explanation.

In any Case, in California, for example, we have a Board of Equalization that can stabilize markets not induce chaos in markets. Employers could simply get, Equalized, on the back-end. Employers have accounting departments to help them out.

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.


And you think that proves that a higher MW doesn't harm MW workers? Dude!!

Why should it? More pay and less unemployment.

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

 

[danielpalos]

In the short run or the long run? Seattle and San Francisco are establishing metrics that gainsay current, accepted dogma. Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.

The right wing has no consistent explanation.

In any Case, in California, for example, we have a Board of Equalization that can stabilize markets not induce chaos in markets. Employers could simply get, Equalized, on the back-end. Employers have accounting departments to help them out.

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.


And you think that proves that a higher MW doesn't harm MW workers? Dude!!

Why should it? More pay and less unemployment.

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

 

[hadit]

Both jurisdictions have higher than national average minimum wages and have lower than national average unemployment rates.


And you think that proves that a higher MW doesn't harm MW workers? Dude!!

Why should it? More pay and less unemployment.

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

 

[danielpalos]

Why should it? More pay and less unemployment.

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What does the supply/demand curve for unskilled labor look like at $7.25?
What does it look like at $15? What does it look like at $30?

Ask an adult. Get back to me.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

strike one.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

 

[danielpalos]

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

Have you ever seen a supply/demand curve?

strike one.

explain Seattle and San Francisco.

So you've never taken an Econ class.
Tell me again how a higher MW raises employment for low-skilled labor.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike two.
explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong.

The supply/demand curve is wrong? Dude!

Your, accepted dogma must be wrong. Or, there is some other factor involved.

strike three.
.
You can't explain the lower than national average unemployment rate for those two jurisdictions with a higher than average minimum wage.

 

[hadit]

Address this seriously. Why do we not just raise the MW to$100/he and eliminate poverty altogether? Serious answers only, please.

For the same reason we cannot simply lower the tax rate to zero, to grow our economy. Same basic concept.

and, social services cost around fourteen dollars an hour, anyway.

the left doesn't believe in subsidizing, already rich capitalist "leaches".

IOW, the MW costs jobs if it's too high. You cannot, therefore, simply raise it as high as you want with no impact.

special pleading? a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage is better than the fourteen dollar an hour equivalent from social services.

There is no unemployment under Capitalism, only underpayment.

You apparently believe we can double the national MW with no impact. That is foolish.

lol. the "impact" is a cost of living adjustment for Labor.

You're arguing from ignorance again. Here's a hint. The majority by far of Americans earn less than $20/hr. Double the MW to $15/hr and all those workers will demand raises, big ones. You would see a lot more on welfare, and you would immediately start complaining that $14/hr welfare is too little since MW jobs pay more.

Tell you what. Let's lower the cost of welfare until it's less than MW.