wirebender
Senior Member
There's no claim of "free enrgy" in AGW theory. What you're calling free energy is actually that energy which is prevented from leaving the atmosphere by GHGs. You may be able to fool Fitz, but with you're preaching to the choir. From my perspective your analysis doesn't hold water in that one of it's major premises is FALSE, i.e. that there's some sort extra energy that isn't accounted for, when in actuality the extra energy is just a figment of your imagination.
Did you even look at the energy budget upon which the whole AGW hoax is built? Which part of it are you not grasping? It clearly shows 166 watts per square meter from the sun being absorbed by the earth. Then on the other side of the graphic it clearly shows 323 watts per square meter in back radiation being absorbed by the surface of the earth. Then it shows 356 watts per square meter being emitted by the surface of the earth. When you have only one energy source, and it is providing 166 watts per square meter and you are emitting 356 watts per square meter, somewhere you are making the claim of free energy.
The graphic clearly shows and states that the 323 watts per square meter in so called backradiation is being absorbed by the earth and thus allowing the earth to radiate more than two times the amount of energy that it recieves from the sun. Where is the energy beyond the 166 watts per square meter coming from? There is only one energy source and that is the sun so the total amount of energy available at the surface of the earth is 166 watts per square meter. Where does the rest fome from? Explain in detail.