Can anyone, please, tell us what kind of jobs Trump wants to create? Anyone?

[Votto]

Trump keeps talking about creating jobs.

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

And he talks about bringing jobs back. But since we have lost jobs in manufacturing, and so has China and Mexico, it's unclear where they would be coming from.

So anyone? And what kind of education or training would be necessary?

There is a vacancy for the President.

Outside of that, I don't know what jobs he will produce.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump wants to create higher paying jobs people can live on vs the part time minimum wage crap jobs Obama, Hillary, and the Democrats brag about daily.

A typical lying scum Right-wing lie!

 

[hjmick]

Youge ones, believe him, it'll happen...

 

[edthecynic]

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

Of course not, cheap natural gas has killed the coal industry. But Trumpsters have never cared about facts!

If that's true then why regulate it out of business? makes no sense.

Coal was dying long before any emission regulations went into effect, you can thank fracking for that. Regulations simply hasten the conversion from the older least efficient coal fired plants to cheaper cleaner natural gas, which had already begun when Natural Gas prices fell dramatically. Newer more efficient coal fired plants are not significantly affected by the new rules which are slowly phased in, and when carbon capture systems are perfected coal will probably rebound.

 

[tinydancer]

So far he has created thousands of jobs in his businesses.

For foreigners.

Suck on this Ed.



"Who is the other notable person being honored at the gathering?

Donald J. Trump.

Why? Because of his support of and investment in the black community.

Jesse Jackson was absolutely gushing with praise for Trump, whose work crews comprised a disproportionately high percentage of black and Hispanic builders, stating:

Let me bring forth a friend who has, well, he is deceptive in his social style [inaudible], one can miss his seriousness and his commitment for the success is beyond argument…He has a sense of the curious and a will to make things better.

Jackson went on to enumerate various ways that Trump had shown himself to be a genuine partner in promoting inclusivity and helping those living in under served communities."

Blog: Shock video: Jesse Jackson gushes with praise for Donald Trump


Read more: Blog: Shock video: Jesse Jackson gushes with praise for Donald Trump
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

[Grizz]

What kind of jobs? The same as he always creates, those that don't pay a living wage in his newest casino.

Tell us kid (and you'd be the first), how MUCH is a "living wage"?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Trump keeps talking about creating jobs.

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

And he talks about bringing jobs back. But since we have lost jobs in manufacturing, and so has China and Mexico, it's unclear where they would be coming from.

So anyone? And what kind of education or training would be necessary?

What kind of jobs?

The best ones. Believe me.

 

[TheDude]

I work with an intelligent beautiful woman with a masters degree, but she's so fogged up by liberal rhetoric she doesn't know which end is up. She had the audacity to say Trump was an unsuccessful business man and not wealthy at all. Holy Batman she sends me a Forbes link and declares "see, Trump isn't even on the list of billionaires"......First thing I do is punch in "Trump's net worth into the search engine, and the first link from Forbes reads over three billion bucks.

Those who suggest Trump doesn't have the capacity to create jobs..................Sorry man, I can't help you through this.

Let me guess... gender studies degree?

And that part about "beauty" was "generously stated":

She also made the point the reason I don't support Hillary is because she's a woman. Wholly smokes what has happened to our brains? Blame the internet, "liberal meanings", projection, technology, specialization, dumbed-down population, and leadership not held accountable for their actions (i.e., Obama and Hillary). Hillary is a clear example of that. Nixon did FAR LESS than what WE KNOW Hillary has done Difference is we held people responsible for their actions during the 70s. Today crooks are national heroes. Painful to watch. This is the shtstorm we leave our children.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

How many has Hillary created vs Trump???

How many did she stiff for their pay?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Trump keeps talking about creating jobs.

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

And he talks about bringing jobs back. But since we have lost jobs in manufacturing, and so has China and Mexico, it's unclear where they would be coming from.

So anyone? And what kind of education or training would be necessary?

What kind of jobs?

The best ones. Believe me.

Yuuuuge jobs. Bigly job growth

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Trump keeps talking about creating jobs.

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

And he talks about bringing jobs back. But since we have lost jobs in manufacturing, and so has China and Mexico, it's unclear where they would be coming from.

So anyone? And what kind of education or training would be necessary?

correct you are.
I say vote for Hillary and stay unemployed and stupid. Makes no sense in considering a candidate that actually wants to bring every available job back to the U.S.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

How many has Hillary created vs Trump???

How many did she stiff for their pay?

We do know she pays women staffers less than men. Or are we not supposed to speak of that

 

[regent]

I know the "wall builders" in my neighborhood are looking forward to a job, other than that?

 

[edthecynic]

DETROIT -- Ford said Thursday it will move production of the Focus and C-Max small cars from its Michigan Assembly Plant in 2018, with union officials saying they were told the work will leave the U.S..

As is so typical of lying scum Trumpsters, they leave out that no jobs will be lost because in demand Ford trucks and SUVs will be produced in the US plants in their place!!!!!

From your own link:
"Ford insists the Wayne plant, which employs 4,000, will not close."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/b...n-mexico-no-its-not-cutting-us-jobs.html?_r=0

Mr. Trump and others have criticized Ford for creating jobs in Mexico rather than in the United States. Seldom mentioned by Ford’s critics, though, is an essential fact. The Wayne factory will remain fully staffed, with 3,700 workers, to build what Ford really needs now: more trucks and S.U.V.s.

snip/

About three in five new vehicles sold in the United States in September were trucks or sport utility vehicles, according to the research firm Autodata. Analysts see no sign that demand for roomy, utilitarian pickups and S.U.V.s will abate as long as gas prices remain low.

Rather than a frenzied Nafta-driven flight to the bottom of the labor market, in other words, Ford’s retooling of its Wayne factory is more a nuanced reflection of the industry’s desire to keep pace with growing demand for high-profit trucks and S.U.V.s, while continuing to produce less expensive car models at lower costs with the cheaper wages paid in Mexico.

Ford’s Wayne factory signifies the reality of the marketplace. Simply put, Detroit cannot make money producing small cars in the United States

 

[ClosedCaption]

What kind of jobs? The same as he always creates, those that don't pay a living wage in his newest casino.

Tell us kid (and you'd be the first), how MUCH is a "living wage"?

Oh boy! What is a living wage? What is fair? What is rich? yak yak yak

 

[Iceweasel]

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

Of course not, cheap natural gas has killed the coal industry. But Trumpsters have never cared about facts!

If that's true then why regulate it out of business? makes no sense.

Coal was dying long before any emission regulations went into effect, you can thank fracking for that. Regulations simply hasten the conversion from the older least efficient coal fired plants to cheaper cleaner natural gas, which had already begun when Natural Gas prices fell dramatically. Newer more efficient coal fired plants are not significantly affected by the new rules which are slowly phased in, and when carbon capture systems are perfected coal will probably rebound.

Link?

 

[Iceweasel]

How many has Hillary created vs Trump???

How many did she stiff for their pay?

How many did Trump?

 

[edthecynic]

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

Of course not, cheap natural gas has killed the coal industry. But Trumpsters have never cared about facts!

If that's true then why regulate it out of business? makes no sense.

Coal was dying long before any emission regulations went into effect, you can thank fracking for that. Regulations simply hasten the conversion from the older least efficient coal fired plants to cheaper cleaner natural gas, which had already begun when Natural Gas prices fell dramatically. Newer more efficient coal fired plants are not significantly affected by the new rules which are slowly phased in, and when carbon capture systems are perfected coal will probably rebound.

Link?

Fact-checking Obama's rules on carbon and coal plants

Republican in the race, Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, went too far on a couple counts.

Capito claims the EPA’s June regulations mean "you're not even going to be able to burn coal very limitedly in the existing plants."

Taken literally, this is quite false. The rules don’t keep plants from burning coal.

The EPA proposal sets a different carbon reduction threshold for each state based on feasibility, cost and current pollution levels, to help achieve a 30 percent reduction in carbon emissions nationally by 2030.

To reach their respective goals, each state can choose from a multitude of options, including regional cap and trade networks, investments in renewable energy and building smart grid technology.

And, yes, they could phase out some existing coal plants.

Experts noted, though, that the goals are phased in gradually and can be met without stopping many plants from burning coal, even in states heavily reliant on fossil fuels.

"We’re going to see a shakeout of older and smaller coal plants, the least efficient ones anyway," said Dallas Burtraw, associate director of the Resources for the Future Center for Climate and Electricity Policy, an energy think tank funded by government, nonprofits and energy companies. "The ones that remain will have a high level of environmental controls and will run relatively efficiently with a high utilization rate."

As for Capito’s claim that regulations will stop existing plants from burning coal, we rated the statement False.

 

[Iceweasel]

So far, he's talked about more coal miners. Does that even make sense?

Of course not, cheap natural gas has killed the coal industry. But Trumpsters have never cared about facts!

If that's true then why regulate it out of business? makes no sense.

Coal was dying long before any emission regulations went into effect, you can thank fracking for that. Regulations simply hasten the conversion from the older least efficient coal fired plants to cheaper cleaner natural gas, which had already begun when Natural Gas prices fell dramatically. Newer more efficient coal fired plants are not significantly affected by the new rules which are slowly phased in, and when carbon capture systems are perfected coal will probably rebound.

Link?

Fact-checking Obama's rules on carbon and coal plants

Republican in the race, Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, went too far on a couple counts.

Capito claims the EPA’s June regulations mean "you're not even going to be able to burn coal very limitedly in the existing plants."

Taken literally, this is quite false. The rules don’t keep plants from burning coal.

The EPA proposal sets a different carbon reduction threshold for each state based on feasibility, cost and current pollution levels, to help achieve a 30 percent reduction in carbon emissions nationally by 2030.

To reach their respective goals, each state can choose from a multitude of options, including regional cap and trade networks, investments in renewable energy and building smart grid technology.

And, yes, they could phase out some existing coal plants.

Experts noted, though, that the goals are phased in gradually and can be met without stopping many plants from burning coal, even in states heavily reliant on fossil fuels.

"We’re going to see a shakeout of older and smaller coal plants, the least efficient ones anyway," said Dallas Burtraw, associate director of the Resources for the Future Center for Climate and Electricity Policy, an energy think tank funded by government, nonprofits and energy companies. "The ones that remain will have a high level of environmental controls and will run relatively efficiently with a high utilization rate."

As for Capito’s claim that regulations will stop existing plants from burning coal, we rated the statement False.

We have clean air and 10% of the energy comes from coal. Liberals have been whipped up into a frenzy without knowing any facts.

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump wants to create higher paying jobs people can live on vs the part time minimum wage crap jobs Obama, Hillary, and the Democrats brag about daily.

A typical lying scum Right-wing lie!

The truth hurts, suck it.