Cambridge Analytica caught in video sting

[theDoctorisIn]

I do?

You're derailing your own thread....moron.

Have at it...it's a nothing burger

No, that would be you, and all the other fuckwits who can't read. I'm trying my best to keep this thread on topic.

Which, I will remind everyone again, is not about the facebook data.

Please, stop and take the time to read the OP before commenting.

Cambridge Analytica Did Nothing Unusual

I read just fine, fuckwit ....and I did read your OP...Cambridge said they did nothing wrong, some reporter said they did...he said she said.

It's all on video.

It's all right there in the OP.

Well charge them, burn them at the stake, whatever.....it's a yawner

For such a "yawner", you can't seem to stop posting in the thread.

I wonder why that is?

 

[blackhawk]

The Obama campigan used data analytics in 2012 campigans using personal information to try and influence voters has been going on for a very long time they fact they are now using online information to try and do it should surprise no one. There is no privacy online doesn't matter if your posting on social media, shopping online, or posting here it's out there for anyone who wants to see it.
How Obama’s Team Used Big Data to Rally Voters

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The Obama campigan used data analytics in 2012 campigans using personal information to try and influence voters has been going on for a very long time they fact they are now using online information to try and do it should surprise no one. There is no privacy online doesn't matter if your posting on social media, shopping online, or posting here it's out there for anyone who wants to see it.
How Obama’s Team Used Big Data to Rally Voters

I think you might be lost.

The thread about Cambridge Analytica and the facebook data is over there ----> Cambridge-Analytica harvested Facebook data illegally

 

[JGalt]

I wasn't talking to you and his link has Cambridge in it you dumbed down fucking clown

I know his link about facebook. But this thread isn't.

Why is that so hard to understand?

His link is also about Cambridge...it's even in the freaking title. Good fucking grief

You're not understanding. I'll try to spell it out for you using the smallest words I can.

This thread is about the CEO of Cambridge Analytica offering to hire Ukrainian hookers to entrap a political opponent to a reporter posing as a Sri Lankan politician.

This thread is not about Cambridge Analytica using facebook user data. There is another thread on that topic.

These are two entirely separate topics, involving the same shady organization.

The pink-haired Canadian "whistleblower" is lying. He's just making that up to gain attention after being threatened with a lawsuit.

We spoke with the whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica’s Facebook scam

A Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

That's good enough for me.

That's good enough for you? Really?

A company whose CEO was just caught on camera suggesting that a prospective client hire them to entrap and bribe their opponents denies it, and claims instead that they were the good guys all along, and they were trying to entrap the entraper.

And that's good enough for you.

Congratulations, you're even stupider than you look.

Any CEO can say anything he wants on camera or off camera. It doesn't mean that it's true. Hell, Ronald Reagan once said off camera The bombing will begin in ten minutes..", but that didn't happen, did it?

This is nothing but hearsay.

 

[Contumacious]

I know that Cambridge Analytica has already been in the news this week, with the revelation that they harvested significant amounts of facebook data, but this is apparently an entirely different story that also broke today.

Cambridge Analytica, for those who don't know, is a conservative "data management" firm owned by the Mercer family (and formerly run by Steve Bannon) with a fairly shady history of psy-ops in regard to elections all around the world. It appears that a reporter from Channel 4 News in England recently recorded a "sting" meeting with the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, in which that CEO made a number of offers to entrap and blackmail a hypothetical political opponent, including suggesting sending Ukrainian hookers to someone's house and filming it (to release via shell organizations on twitter), and various other shady things.

There is apparently more to come, tomorrow - which directly involves the work they did for Donald Trump.

Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Unbelievable, you have the fucking NSA, FBI spying on Americans with impunity but the dingle berries are "concerned" about Cambridge Analytica . Un believable

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I know his link about facebook. But this thread isn't.

Why is that so hard to understand?

His link is also about Cambridge...it's even in the freaking title. Good fucking grief

You're not understanding. I'll try to spell it out for you using the smallest words I can.

This thread is about the CEO of Cambridge Analytica offering to hire Ukrainian hookers to entrap a political opponent to a reporter posing as a Sri Lankan politician.

This thread is not about Cambridge Analytica using facebook user data. There is another thread on that topic.

These are two entirely separate topics, involving the same shady organization.

The pink-haired Canadian "whistleblower" is lying. He's just making that up to gain attention after being threatened with a lawsuit.

We spoke with the whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica’s Facebook scam

A Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

That's good enough for me.

That's good enough for you? Really?

A company whose CEO was just caught on camera suggesting that a prospective client hire them to entrap and bribe their opponents denies it, and claims instead that they were the good guys all along, and they were trying to entrap the entraper.

And that's good enough for you.

Congratulations, you're even stupider than you look.

Any CEO can say anything he wants on camera or off camera. It doesn't mean that it's true. Hell, Ronald Reagan once said off camera The bombing will begin in ten minutes..", but that didn't happen, did it?

It's time to cut your losses.

 

[Rambunctious]

The real story of how big data analytics helped Obama win

 

[theDoctorisIn]

No, that would be you, and all the other fuckwits who can't read. I'm trying my best to keep this thread on topic.

Which, I will remind everyone again, is not about the facebook data.

Please, stop and take the time to read the OP before commenting.

Cambridge Analytica Did Nothing Unusual

I read just fine, fuckwit ....and I did read your OP...Cambridge said they did nothing wrong, some reporter said they did...he said she said.

It's all on video.

It's all right there in the OP.

Well charge them, burn them at the stake, whatever.....it's a yawner

For such a "yawner", you can't seem to stop posting in the thread.

I wonder why that is?

To mock you...

That's pretty sad.

 

[Rambunctious]

How Obama's data crunchers helped him win - CNN

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The real story of how big data analytics helped Obama win

Wrong thread.

Seriously, do anyone of you guys know how to read?

 

[Manonthestreet]

You know, I'm still wondering why people put their lives on Facebook.

Me? Yeah, I have a page, but I only use it to keep in touch with friends and family, I don't tell everything that is going on in my life.

Why? I like my privacy and don't like having propaganda shoved down my throat.

By the way, did you see the way the stock market tanked today because of Facebook?

Why is Facebook even a Dow component......ridiculous.....

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I know that Cambridge Analytica has already been in the news this week, with the revelation that they harvested significant amounts of facebook data, but this is apparently an entirely different story that also broke today.

Cambridge Analytica, for those who don't know, is a conservative "data management" firm owned by the Mercer family (and formerly run by Steve Bannon) with a fairly shady history of psy-ops in regard to elections all around the world. It appears that a reporter from Channel 4 News in England recently recorded a "sting" meeting with the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, in which that CEO made a number of offers to entrap and blackmail a hypothetical political opponent, including suggesting sending Ukrainian hookers to someone's house and filming it (to release via shell organizations on twitter), and various other shady things.

There is apparently more to come, tomorrow - which directly involves the work they did for Donald Trump.

Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Unbelievable, you have the fucking NSA, FBI spying on Americans with impunity but the dingle berries are "concerned" about Cambridge Analytica . Un believable

No one is forcing you to post in this thread.

You don't appear to have actually read the OP, anyway.

 

[nat4900]

I know that Cambridge Analytica has already been in the news this week, with the revelation that they harvested significant amounts of facebook data, but this is apparently an entirely different story that also broke today.

Cambridge Analytica, for those who don't know, is a conservative "data management" firm owned by the Mercer family (and formerly run by Steve Bannon) with a fairly shady history of psy-ops in regard to elections all around the world. It appears that a reporter from Channel 4 News in England recently recorded a "sting" meeting with the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, in which that CEO made a number of offers to entrap and blackmail a hypothetical political opponent, including suggesting sending Ukrainian hookers to someone's house and filming it (to release via shell organizations on twitter), and various other shady things.

There is apparently more to come, tomorrow - which directly involves the work they did for Donald Trump.

Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Question: What should happen to the FUNDING entities (the Mercers) for this treasonous act?

 

[Rambunctious]

Obama Staffer: Facebook Knew Presidential Campaign Improperly Seized Data, Looked the Other Way

 

[tycho1572]

I know that Cambridge Analytica has already been in the news this week, with the revelation that they harvested significant amounts of facebook data, but this is apparently an entirely different story that also broke today.

Cambridge Analytica, for those who don't know, is a conservative "data management" firm owned by the Mercer family (and formerly run by Steve Bannon) with a fairly shady history of psy-ops in regard to elections all around the world. It appears that a reporter from Channel 4 News in England recently recorded a "sting" meeting with the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, in which that CEO made a number of offers to entrap and blackmail a hypothetical political opponent, including suggesting sending Ukrainian hookers to someone's house and filming it (to release via shell organizations on twitter), and various other shady things.

There is apparently more to come, tomorrow - which directly involves the work they did for Donald Trump.

Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Before I bother watching.. is this as bad as democrats using our government to spy on people during a presidential campaign?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I know that Cambridge Analytica has already been in the news this week, with the revelation that they harvested significant amounts of facebook data, but this is apparently an entirely different story that also broke today.

Cambridge Analytica, for those who don't know, is a conservative "data management" firm owned by the Mercer family (and formerly run by Steve Bannon) with a fairly shady history of psy-ops in regard to elections all around the world. It appears that a reporter from Channel 4 News in England recently recorded a "sting" meeting with the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, in which that CEO made a number of offers to entrap and blackmail a hypothetical political opponent, including suggesting sending Ukrainian hookers to someone's house and filming it (to release via shell organizations on twitter), and various other shady things.

There is apparently more to come, tomorrow - which directly involves the work they did for Donald Trump.

Revealed: Trump’s election consultants filmed saying they use bribes and sex workers to entrap politicians

Question: What should happen to the FUNDING entities (the Mercers) for this treasonous act?

Nothing, unless it's found out (1) the issues in the OP are found to be true, and (2) that the Mercers were explicitly aware of it going on.

In that case, they'd likely be found guilty of conspiracy to violate the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

 

[JGalt]

His link is also about Cambridge...it's even in the freaking title. Good fucking grief

You're not understanding. I'll try to spell it out for you using the smallest words I can.

This thread is about the CEO of Cambridge Analytica offering to hire Ukrainian hookers to entrap a political opponent to a reporter posing as a Sri Lankan politician.

This thread is not about Cambridge Analytica using facebook user data. There is another thread on that topic.

These are two entirely separate topics, involving the same shady organization.

The pink-haired Canadian "whistleblower" is lying. He's just making that up to gain attention after being threatened with a lawsuit.

We spoke with the whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica’s Facebook scam

A Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

That's good enough for me.

That's good enough for you? Really?

A company whose CEO was just caught on camera suggesting that a prospective client hire them to entrap and bribe their opponents denies it, and claims instead that they were the good guys all along, and they were trying to entrap the entraper.

And that's good enough for you.

Congratulations, you're even stupider than you look.

Any CEO can say anything he wants on camera or off camera. It doesn't mean that it's true. Hell, Ronald Reagan once said off camera The bombing will begin in ten minutes..", but that didn't happen, did it?

It's time to cut your losses.

Time to cut yours. If this is supposed to be the "next big thing" against Trump and the GOP, it's pretty weak.

Better luck next time.

 

[bodecea]

Cambridge Analytica Did Nothing Unusual

I read just fine, fuckwit ....and I did read your OP...Cambridge said they did nothing wrong, some reporter said they did...he said she said.

It's all on video.

It's all right there in the OP.

Well charge them, burn them at the stake, whatever.....it's a yawner

For such a "yawner", you can't seem to stop posting in the thread.

I wonder why that is?

To mock you...

That's pretty sad.

This IS Zone 2, isn't it?

 

[Rambunctious]

Cambridge Analytica’s use of Facebook is straight from Obama’s playbook | Coffee House

 

[theDoctorisIn]

You're not understanding. I'll try to spell it out for you using the smallest words I can.

This thread is about the CEO of Cambridge Analytica offering to hire Ukrainian hookers to entrap a political opponent to a reporter posing as a Sri Lankan politician.

This thread is not about Cambridge Analytica using facebook user data. There is another thread on that topic.

These are two entirely separate topics, involving the same shady organization.

The pink-haired Canadian "whistleblower" is lying. He's just making that up to gain attention after being threatened with a lawsuit.

We spoke with the whistleblower who exposed Cambridge Analytica’s Facebook scam

A Cambridge Analytica spokesman said: “We entirely refute any allegation that Cambridge Analytica or any of its affiliates use entrapment, bribes, or so-called “honey-traps” for any purpose whatsoever… We routinely undertake conversations with prospective clients to try to tease out any unethical or illegal intentions…”

That's good enough for me.

That's good enough for you? Really?

A company whose CEO was just caught on camera suggesting that a prospective client hire them to entrap and bribe their opponents denies it, and claims instead that they were the good guys all along, and they were trying to entrap the entraper.

And that's good enough for you.

Congratulations, you're even stupider than you look.

Any CEO can say anything he wants on camera or off camera. It doesn't mean that it's true. Hell, Ronald Reagan once said off camera The bombing will begin in ten minutes..", but that didn't happen, did it?

It's time to cut your losses.

Time to cut yours. If this is supposed to be the "next big thing" against Trump and the GOP, it's pretty weak.

Better luck next time.

If you really believed that, you wouldn't be wasting our time with your pathetic attempts to deflect and cover.

There's more coming tomorrow.