Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dude you are truly naive. You're hilarious to follow on here. you still know nothing. And admit as such especially with this one. so how smart can you be, when the water table was rising what was the population of the area and now 100 years later is the same population there or was there an increase? Come on now it isn't that hard of a question I know you have it in you.The high water levels (in the artificial lake) were produced with native rainfall and were maintained long enough to grow most of a forest at that line. What data do you have to show rainfalls were high all those years?
nothing again. mumbo jumbo!There has never been a rate of CO2 increase like the last century's in the last 65 million years.
There has never been a rate of temperature increase like the last century's in the history of the human race.
But you think its okay. Got it.
So, you're saying that the population hasn't increased in the desert there as well? So you too are naive and know nothing? It's funny how you all stick together. You should go play with Crick he's waiting.This ought to be goodReally. A massive population increase has caused the rain to stop falling? Care to explain that one?
Based on what evidence? Again, you have nothing. You just keep regurgitating your nothingness. Give it up, it ain't working.Youch said:Yet, we are supposed to believe your contention that, if only some rain would fall in the SW, everything would be copacetic?
Let's address your specific position...are you saying that if rain doesn't increase at the same rate as demand for potable water, then global warming is the chief concern?
My contention is that the chance of droughts like this occurring increases with increasing global warming. Precipitation in the western US is strongly subject to the ENSO cycles whose timing and magnitude have been affected by global warming. Whatever the cause of this drought, there exists a very high likelihood that due to global warming, we will see more of these in the future than we have seen in the past. THAT is my position. Your attempt to mischaracterize my position in your second paragraph was a pathetic attempt at making a straw man: it is supported by NOTHING I have said here.
What's your point?shits gettin' real now deniers: Groundwater California s big unknown NOAA Climate.gov
Because more than you post in it. See a message board is posting against another, and another and so on and so on. And when junk is published in a thread it must be pointed out. You see some of California is a desert. And believe it or not, has been a desert for longer than you and I have been alive. So you posting about it being in a drought is not new to the state. So therefore, I don't get your point. When you don't provide one or any explanation on where you're headed with a post, expect a post to ask the point. Hence, my post.^ why do you bother posting in my threads?We won't complain if you migrate away to one of the social threads. Seriously
I said "My contention is that the chance of droughts like this occurring increases with increasing global warming. Precipitation in the western US is strongly subject to the ENSO cycles whose timing and magnitude have been affected by global warming. Whatever the cause of this drought, there exists a very high likelihood that due to global warming, we will see more of these in the future than we have seen in the past. THAT is my position."
Are you under the impression that pre-industrial rainfall in southern california was so low that it's not possible for the area to suffer a drought?
He got such a laugh out of it he just had to like it! good comedy sometimes brings that out of people. Objectivity, naw you ain't got any of that. All you have is NoNseNe.....................A fan of informed objectivity?
Crick said:I said "My contention is that the chance of droughts like this occurring increases with increasing global warming. Precipitation in the western US is strongly subject to the ENSO cycles whose timing and magnitude have been affected by global warming. Whatever the cause of this drought, there exists a very high likelihood that due to global warming, we will see more of these in the future than we have seen in the past. THAT is my position."
Why?Please explain why you believe my explanation of my position regarding drought and global warming is comical.
Crick said:I said "My contention is that the chance of droughts like this occurring increases with increasing global warming. Precipitation in the western US is strongly subject to the ENSO cycles whose timing and magnitude have been affected by global warming. Whatever the cause of this drought, there exists a very high likelihood that due to global warming, we will see more of these in the future than we have seen in the past. THAT is my position."
^ thatBecause I have already done so more than once. I think I should start demanding you show us the experiment in which it fails.
ummm..... Theres a hurricane over on the SW coast. Nice try though
