Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, you aren't able to share any? I didn't think you could because it's a toy.
The govt already has the power.Same goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missileBut for a human being a baseball bat could never hit a homerun, a tennis racquet could never serve an ace, a soccer ball could never score a goal, a car could never drive across the country, AND a gun could never shoot a bullet.
Removing the inanimate object cannot control the actions of human beings. Think about it.
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
We the People are the GovernmentSame goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missileBut for a human being a baseball bat could never hit a homerun, a tennis racquet could never serve an ace, a soccer ball could never score a goal, a car could never drive across the country, AND a gun could never shoot a bullet.
Removing the inanimate object cannot control the actions of human beings. Think about it.
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
Why do we need to ensure that mass shooters get the best tools to kill school children?Let’s be honest with ourselves....If you can’t stop all suicides, does that mean you shouldn’t try to stop any?again, do you think banning guns would stop all suicides? or reduce the number of them?
please think before answering. also, it would very difficult to shoot yourself with an AR15 or any rifle.
so now you want to ban all handguns in order to reduce the number of suicides? Banning large capacity magazines will not stop any suicides, it only takes one bullet, not several.
Unless you are a Clinton crony who commits suicide by two shots to the back of the head.
30,000 gun deaths a year and the overwhelming majority is by handguns
Banning handguns would create the biggest drop in our gun death rate.......but we all know we will never do that
So, in the absence of banning handguns, we need to nibble at the edges for other culprits. Assault guns with large capacity magazines is an obvious target
They're an obvious target because they're the obvious choice when planning a mass shooting.
The govt already has the power.Same goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missileBut for a human being a baseball bat could never hit a homerun, a tennis racquet could never serve an ace, a soccer ball could never score a goal, a car could never drive across the country, AND a gun could never shoot a bullet.
Removing the inanimate object cannot control the actions of human beings. Think about it.
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
It's outlined clearly in the constitution. ARs can be outlawed while still retaining second amd rights.
We the People are the GovernmentSame goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missileBut for a human being a baseball bat could never hit a homerun, a tennis racquet could never serve an ace, a soccer ball could never score a goal, a car could never drive across the country, AND a gun could never shoot a bullet.
Removing the inanimate object cannot control the actions of human beings. Think about it.
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
Why do we need to ensure that mass shooters get the best tools to kill school children?
So, you aren't able to share any? I didn't think you could because it's a toy.
Share what, I asked rightwinger what he was basing his question(or assertion) on.
I was asking him to share what he thinks, and you decided to bring up zombies and toys.
If zombies and toys are the best you have to offer, there is no reason for me entertain your nonsense.
Playing dumb, huh?
Give us some practical uses for an AR with a thirty round magazine.
We the People are the GovernmentSame goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missileBut for a human being a baseball bat could never hit a homerun, a tennis racquet could never serve an ace, a soccer ball could never score a goal, a car could never drive across the country, AND a gun could never shoot a bullet.
Removing the inanimate object cannot control the actions of human beings. Think about it.
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
I know I'm correct.The govt already has the power.Same goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missile
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
It's outlined clearly in the constitution. ARs can be outlawed while still retaining second amd rights.
You are absolutely wrong, but I do admire your consistency.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
There are millions of AR-15s owned by The People. It is a common form of "Arms". If the government tries to outlaw or sieze them, that would be an abuse of power in violation of the 2nd Amendment.
Playing dumb, huh?
Give us some practical uses for an AR with a thirty round magazine.
I am not playing dumb, and you have clearly demonstrated your inability to determine practicality.
Go play with your zombies and toys.
We the People, in order to create a more perfect unionWe the People are the GovernmentSame goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missile
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
No, We The People are most certainly not the government. The government represents us but is not us.
Jerry Brown was elected by We the PeopleWe the People are the GovernmentSame goes for an RPG or shoulder mounted missile
or a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
You bet, explain that one to Jerry Brown or any fricken liberal that wants open borders.
Why do we need to ensure that mass shooters get the best tools to kill school children?
Mass school shooters don't always, nor exclusively, use the tools you are attempting to ban.
The fact you don't realize or acknowledge that goes further towards identifying where we have no obligation to expect honesty or intellectual integrity in your request.
Jerry Brown was elected by We the PeopleWe the People are the Governmentor a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
You bet, explain that one to Jerry Brown or any fricken liberal that wants open borders.
So...your logic is we should make no effort to end school shootings until we have ended every railroad crossing deathIt seems that they are making cars that can drive themselves for some reason. More people die horrible deaths at railroad crossings than in school shootings but nobody seems to care. It depends on how the left uses a tragedy for political purposes.
We the People, in order to create a more perfect unionWe the People are the Governmentor a tank, but I think we all agree that an average citizen should not be driving a tank to the grocery store or walking around with a ground to air missile
It all comes down to how much power we want an individual to have at his fingertips
Do your need a 100 round magazine and a bump stock that lets you shoot at 500 rpms?
The real question which you wish to avoid is how much Power government should have.
The government has a responsibility to protect us
No, We The People are most certainly not the government. The government represents us but is not us.
Very true.....but for some reason, when the want to choose the best tool to kill small children
They go with an AR-15 with large capacity magazine
Why do we insist on giving them the best tool?
