Bush's Bid To Stay Relevant

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Darwins Friend, Jan 29, 2007.

  1. Darwins Friend
    Offline

    Darwins Friend Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    181
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +17
    from the January 26, 2007 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0126/p09s02-cods.html

    The president's effort to change minds about his Iraq war strategy isn't working. By Daniel Schorr / WASHINGTON

    The atmosphere after the State of the Union address this week brought back to mind 1995, when President Clinton, after sharp Democratic reverses in the midterm election, told a news conference that, under the Constitution, he was still "relevant."

    It also recalls 2004, when a newly reelected President Bush told a news conference that he had earned "political capital" in the campaign – capital that he intended to spend on issues dear to him, such as Social Security, tax reform, and the war against terror.

    That capital has run out, and Tuesday night's State of the Union speech, professionally crafted though it was, reflected the bruising rejection of the president in most of the opinion polls and, more significant, in the November election. There are growing demands that the American military extricate itself from a conflict that increasingly looks like a Sunni-Shiite civil war.

    The usual practice for a president in trouble on the domestic front is to shift his emphasis to the international scene. In this case, the speech was almost evenly divided between domestic initiatives such as healthcare, Social Security, energy, and immigration, and the foreign scene, meaning Iraq – the inescapable subject.

    But there was no sign that he changed many minds. Mr. Bush talked of trying to avert a "nightmare scenario," of facing a defeat that would be "grievous and far-reaching," and he appealed to Congress and the public to give him one last opportunity to win, with his new strategy featuring a temporary military reinforcement.

    But that is falling on deaf ears. On Wednesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, acting by design immediately after the State of the Union, approved by a vote of 12-9 a resolution saying that an escalation of American troop strength in Iraq is against the national interest.

    The resolution is what's called "nonbinding" – that is, not obliging the administration to do anything. But it makes Bush look like a lame duck indeed.

    * Poor Blinky * :sad:
     
  2. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,914
    Thanks Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,804
    The President's job isn't to change people's minds. His job is to do what it takes to win the war, even if folks like you would prefer he fail. You can win a war as long as you are willing to fight, you lose a war the minute you quit.
     
  3. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    thats not what the Constitution says...oh ya right i forgot..america is decidership state now
     
  4. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,914
    Thanks Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,804
    Feel free to move out since your so oppressed by the dictator, though I don't know what a 'decidership' is. Or let me guess, you're blogging between torture sessions at a secret Bush detention center. :rofl:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    how about demanding the government represent the will of the people instead?
     
  6. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64
    No a retired Master Chief, but hey that retirement check that is direct deposited is spent well every month and to think you could have been a civilian but opted to make a career in the Navy. You fooled a lot of folks with that one.
     
  7. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I believe that is what 2004 was about. He won. We are NOT a democracy, but a democratic republic. Get another shot in less than 2 years.
     
  8. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    If he were actually doing what it takes to "win the war", it wouldn't be an issue, now would it. Bearing that in mind, I would say he's lost any bid to remain relevant.
     
  9. theHawk
    Offline

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,914
    Thanks Received:
    2,073
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,804
    Relevant to who? Poeple like you? Why would he waste his time....
     
  10. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    well theres a few problems like voting machines ect and the fact both selected candidates offered where skull and bones with very similar voting records. but even if you put all this aside there is also a bill of rights and a constitution and this thing called the congress ,all of which have been ignored
    or violated
     

Share This Page