- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,023
- 47,212
- 2,180
Hmm mmm. . . No. That isn't how the Constitution defines treason, moron.
So impatient
Its only been a few months. The Benghazi investigation went on for four years
With Benghazi (which I found a huge waste of time), you had the entire incident in front of you.
You also had a clear view of what was either an incompetent or corrupt administration (and spare me the questions on that.....we all know you are a hack).
This one has yet to really be defined.
Hacking the DNC is not hacking the election.
End of that story.
Hacking the DNC provided a benefit to the Trump Campaign
At the time the hacks were slowly being released, Trump was making arguments to recognize Russian control of Crimea and lift sanctions
At the time the hacks were being released...key members of the Trump campaign were meeting with Russian agents
Trump and his campaign, lied about those meetings taking place
The FBI is investigating. If these are just innocent coincidences...Trump will be cleared
If there is a connection between Putin's actions and Trump's actions.....Trump has committed Treason
I could are less if they are connected in 1000 ways.
It means nothing.
Influencing elections is what people do.
People somehow think this "corrupted" a good system when, in fact, it simply added to an already corrupt lying system.
I really could care less.
The FBI is investigating.....that used to mean something.
If Trump traded "this for that" he committed Treason
Sent from my SM-G930U using USMessageBoard.com mobile app