BREAKING: FBI May Have Flipped Flynn

So what if he is? Nothing that would damage Trump for he did nothing wrong.
 
Wrong again skippy, the marathon bombers came to the US as refugees.

The Boston Bombers Were Not Refugees -- Neither Was the Paris Attacker | The Huffington Post

The Boston Bombers Were Not Refugees — Neither Was the Paris Attacker

In the wake of the Paris attacks, many are trying to connect refugees to terrorism. I’ve noted elsewhere that despite millions of refugees having been admitted since the U.S. refugee resettlement program began in its current form in 1980 — including hundreds of thousands from the Middle East — not a single refugee has committed an act of terrorism in the United States.

Detractors of refugee resettlement, however, point to Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — the Boston Bombers — as evidence to the contrary. The pair of brothers who bombed the Boston Marathon in 2013 were not, however, refugees. They were, on the contrary, children of an asylee, according to the State Department, and the distinction is crucial.

Moreover, the Tsarnaev brothers were not themselves even applicants for asylum. At less than 10-years-old, they were too young to be vetted, and they received derivative status from their father who had, indeed, come to the U.S. fleeing war-torn Chechnya

They were not refugees, and they weren't from any of the six or seven countries Trumps EO would have stopped their entry from. Or as they say, Bitch, meet Slapped.


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.
Whining about semantics –– the third line of the fence for the brain dead conservative.
 
Right, it only took the clintons a couple of months to close shop when they had no more influence to peddle. Also all your side has produced so far, is a butt load of hot air about Trump.

Is Hot Air the nickname for Manafort, Flynn, Page, Sessions, and Stone? Or are those people not revelant because you say so?


No, Clapper, Comey and others have said they're not relevant. But don't let facts get in the way of good commie propaganda, RIGHT?

I won't let facts get in the way. Like the fact that Clapper and Comey has never said they aren't relevant.


Yeah, you stick with your conspiracy theories, both have said there was no collusion or coordination between the campaign and Russia, which makes your conspiracy theory irrelevant.

Comey and Clapper never said they weren't relevant so you lied. Second both have said they see no EVIDENCE of collusion with Russia. Again you lie, but their is enough circumstantial evidence and connections that responding that it's all a coincidence won't work anymore.
And more evidence has surfaced since they said that.
 
The FBI already cleared Flynn of any wrongdoing. So what "deal" could he be cutting?

Of course Flynn would cooperate with the FBI, he has nothing to hide.

He's probably telling them exactly what we all already know, there was absolutely no "collusion" with the Trump administration and Russia for hacking the DNC or negotiations for sanctions.

The only illegal activity were Dems abusing FISA wiretaps in order to spy on the Trump staff.


BULLSHIT--the FBI has NOT cleared Flynn of any WRONG-DOING he LIED under OATH. Jeff Sessions another liar decided not to pursue criminal charges against Flynn, but that doesn't mean the FBI is not waterboarding Flynn right now, and threatening him with charges.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy

Have proof that he "discussed" sanctions? Not that discussing them is even illegal in the first place. By the way, illegally obtained and unverifiable "transcripts" cannot be used as evidence.

FBI had approval to tap the Russians

Team Trump was just stupid enough to call them

Having approval to tap the Russians doesn't give them authority to release information about US Citizens identified in those taps. Comey has already stated that release was a felony.

Has the FBI even admitted they were the ones that requested the Russians be tapped?
Doesn't negate the fact that Flynn was in contact with the Russians
If they didn't have authority to release Flynns name he can sue them
 
What are you talking about? All of these attacks were committed by Islamic Immigrants of the offspring of Islamic Immigrants.

So none of them were refugees, like Trumps EO is trying to keep out. In short, the EO wouldn't have prevented any of the terrorism that is actually happening.

So your response is to let even more of them in? :cuckoo:
 
I am referring to the magnitude of charges Trump could face

Nixon could have faced charges of Obstruction of Justice
Clinton could have faced charges of perjury
Trump would face charges of Treason
Umm, Clinton did face charges of perjury. Hillary could face all kinds of charges too. Think of all the possibilities!

Personally, I'm content to wait for the evidence. LWers are free to rub themselves as they drool over the possibility that "Trump could face" charges just as RWers did over Hillary and Benghazi.

Hillary has been investigated 7 ways to Sunday without a single charge being filed. That's because most of the allegations against the Clintons are based on Republican lies, gossip and innuendo, instead of facts, evidence and witnesses.


Again, no. The reason is the clinton's take control of the law enforcement apparatus and exploit it to keep them from investigating them......bill the rapist was Attorney General of Arkansas, then Governor.........when bill the rapist became President they immediately fired all of the U.S. attorneys, including the one investigating them and their real estate activities in Arkansas...then, of course, as President.....they put their people in at Justice.....
 
The FBI already cleared Flynn of any wrongdoing. So what "deal" could he be cutting?

Of course Flynn would cooperate with the FBI, he has nothing to hide.

He's probably telling them exactly what we all already know, there was absolutely no "collusion" with the Trump administration and Russia for hacking the DNC or negotiations for sanctions.

The only illegal activity were Dems abusing FISA wiretaps in order to spy on the Trump staff.
You do realize that "clearing" him is meaningless since at anytime, they can charge him with any crime they determine he may have committed. And if they determine that he may have committed a crime and decide to charge him, they could offer him a deal to avoid prosecution that he might be interested in taking.
 
Wrong again skippy, the marathon bombers came to the US as refugees.

The Boston Bombers Were Not Refugees -- Neither Was the Paris Attacker | The Huffington Post

The Boston Bombers Were Not Refugees — Neither Was the Paris Attacker

In the wake of the Paris attacks, many are trying to connect refugees to terrorism. I’ve noted elsewhere that despite millions of refugees having been admitted since the U.S. refugee resettlement program began in its current form in 1980 — including hundreds of thousands from the Middle East — not a single refugee has committed an act of terrorism in the United States.

Detractors of refugee resettlement, however, point to Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — the Boston Bombers — as evidence to the contrary. The pair of brothers who bombed the Boston Marathon in 2013 were not, however, refugees. They were, on the contrary, children of an asylee, according to the State Department, and the distinction is crucial.

Moreover, the Tsarnaev brothers were not themselves even applicants for asylum. At less than 10-years-old, they were too young to be vetted, and they received derivative status from their father who had, indeed, come to the U.S. fleeing war-torn Chechnya

They were not refugees, and they weren't from any of the six or seven countries Trumps EO would have stopped their entry from. Or as they say, Bitch, meet Slapped.


Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.
Whining about semantics –– the third line of the fence for the brain dead conservative.


So tell us, what's the difference between a refugee and someone granted asylum other than the name.
 
The FBI already cleared Flynn of any wrongdoing. So what "deal" could he be cutting?

Of course Flynn would cooperate with the FBI, he has nothing to hide.

He's probably telling them exactly what we all already know, there was absolutely no "collusion" with the Trump administration and Russia for hacking the DNC or negotiations for sanctions.

The only illegal activity were Dems abusing FISA wiretaps in order to spy on the Trump staff.
You do realize that "clearing" him is meaningless since at anytime, they can charge him with any crime they determine he may have committed. And if they determine that he may have committed a crime and decide to charge him, they could offer him a deal to avoid prosecution that he might be interested in taking.

If remember correctly, lyng to the. FBI is a crime. He did just that.
 
60795432.jpg

So impatient

Its only been a few months. The Benghazi investigation went on for four years

With Benghazi (which I found a huge waste of time), you had the entire incident in front of you.

You also had a clear view of what was either an incompetent or corrupt administration (and spare me the questions on that.....we all know you are a hack).

This one has yet to really be defined.

Hacking the DNC is not hacking the election.

End of that story.

Hacking the DNC provided a benefit to the Trump Campaign
At the time the hacks were slowly being released, Trump was making arguments to recognize Russian control of Crimea and lift sanctions
At the time the hacks were being released...key members of the Trump campaign were meeting with Russian agents
Trump and his campaign, lied about those meetings taking place

The FBI is investigating. If these are just innocent coincidences...Trump will be cleared
If there is a connection between Putin's actions and Trump's actions.....Trump has committed Treason

I could are less if they are connected in 1000 ways.

It means nothing.

Influencing elections is what people do.

People somehow think this "corrupted" a good system when, in fact, it simply added to an already corrupt lying system.

I really could care less.

The FBI is investigating.....that used to mean something.

If Trump traded "this for that" he committed Treason

Garbage.

He negotiated a deal.
 
I could are less if they are connected in 1000 ways.

It means nothing.

Influencing elections is what people do.

People somehow think this "corrupted" a good system when, in fact, it simply added to an already corrupt lying system.

I really could care less.

The FBI is investigating.....that used to mean something.
I care. It's one thing for the Democratic National Committee to undermine Bernie and other Democrat candidates in order to favor Hillary, but it's another to use a hostile foreign nation to overthrow the US government or to subvert our election process.

That said, I doubt Trump was involved. The fucking Russians and their tin-plated dictator were seeking to fuck with the United States. Their hacking of political parties (I'm sure they hacked the Republicans too) was to seek intell in order to undermine our election process. If they can cause Americans to doubt the veracity of our own election process (more so than usual), that's a win for them.
More than likely. This is reinforced by the fact that they were particularly 'loud' about their actions as Comey testified. IOW, they WANTED to be caught.
 
he's been singing solos at FBI HQ for weeks

no encore required, time to issue warrants and call the US Marshals
 

Forum List

Back
Top