Brave Sir Robin Adam Schiff Bravely Runs Away from Impeaching Trump

[Weatherman2020]

RUNAWAY!!!!!

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., rushed to the defense of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday, saying only “graphic evidence” would warrant an impeachment gamble against President Trump.

“In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to get the support in the Senate needed to make an impeachment successful. Again, my feeling is let’s see what Bob Mueller produces. But the evidence would have to be pretty overwhelming,” Schiff told CNN.

Across the caucus, Democrats have been asked to comment about Pelosi, D-Calif., abruptly shutting the door on impeachment in an interview published Monday.

Adam Schiff: Impeachment gamble not worth it without 'very graphic evidence'

 

[DOTR]

deanrd replies “any day now we are going to not impeach trump just you wait and see!”

 

[Weatherman2020]

deanrd replies “any day now we are going to not impeach trump just you wait and see!”

We all knew this end day of RUSSIA! was coming. Crisis hotlines are getting a busy signal.

 

[DGS49]

Actually, the problem with impeaching the President is that he has done absolutely NOTHING that rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." And if fact, with the "Russia collusion" hoax apparently dying a whimpering death, and "obstruction of justice" taking the top position, Schiff knows that none of the "obstruction of justice" claims passes the laugh test, when exposed to the light of day.

For example, Trump is said to have paid off the bimbo's in order to preserve his unsullied image of a faithful married man - for the voters - and not to keep his wife and kids in the dark. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Trump is said to have fired Comey to impede the now-ridiculous Russia investigation, and not because of his laundry list of blunders as FBI head - which had most Congressional Democrats screaming, "Off with his HEAD!" Riiiiiiiiiight.

It is not "political." Impeachment would simply make the Democrats look more like fools than they already do.

 

[bodecea]

RUNAWAY!!!!!
View attachment 250045

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., rushed to the defense of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday, saying only “graphic evidence” would warrant an impeachment gamble against President Trump.

“In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to get the support in the Senate needed to make an impeachment successful. Again, my feeling is let’s see what Bob Mueller produces. But the evidence would have to be pretty overwhelming,” Schiff told CNN.

Across the caucus, Democrats have been asked to comment about Pelosi, D-Calif., abruptly shutting the door on impeachment in an interview published Monday.

Adam Schiff: Impeachment gamble not worth it without 'very graphic evidence'

NIce try, INCEL.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Actually, the problem with impeaching the President is that he has done absolutely NOTHING that rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." And if fact, with the "Russia collusion" hoax apparently dying a whimpering death, and "obstruction of justice" taking the top position, Schiff knows that none of the "obstruction of justice" claims passes the laugh test, when exposed to the light of day.

For example, Trump is said to have paid off the bimbo's in order to preserve his unsullied image of a faithful married man - for the voters - and not to keep his wife and kids in the dark. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Trump is said to have fired Comey to impede the now-ridiculous Russia investigation, and not because of his laundry list of blunders as FBI head - which had most Congressional Democrats screaming, "Off with his HEAD!" Riiiiiiiiiight.

It is not "political." Impeachment would simply make the Democrats look more like fools than they already do.

But I was assured by my moral and intellectual superiors for two years there was a mountain of evidence to impeach tRump.

 

[Lesh]

Make up your mind. Now you WANT Impeachment?

Well take heart.

The investigations will continue and should the evidence become strong enough...you'll get your Impeachment

 

[Weatherman2020]

Make up your mind. Now you WANT Impeachment?

Well take heart.

The investigations will continue and should the evidence become strong enough...you'll get your Impeachment

ANY DAY NOW!!!

 

[LordBrownTrout]

deanrd replies “any day now we are going to not impeach trump just you wait and see!”

We all knew this end day of RUSSIA! was coming. Crisis hotlines are getting a busy signal.

Exactly. There never was any collusion or tampering. Libs knew it but had to keep the facade going for as long as possible .

 

[Sunsettommy]

Make up your mind. Now you WANT Impeachment?

Well take heart.

The investigations will continue and should the evidence become strong enough...you'll get your Impeachment

The Delusion disease is strong in you and your fellow leftists, the ones who have TDS swirling in your veins.

Nadler has already stated that there is no evidence of Obstruction of Justice against Trump, that the Mueller report will not have a case for Russian election collusion.

You are running on nothing.

 

[Lesh]

Nadler has already stated that there is no evidence of Obstruction of Justice against Trump, that the Mueller report will not have a case for Russian election collusion.

Post quotes and links. Not that I think you're a liar...but...well

Ya know...you're a Trumper so...

 

[iceberg]

Make up your mind. Now you WANT Impeachment?

Well take heart.

The investigations will continue and should the evidence become strong enough...you'll get your Impeachment

$20 says you're wrong.

 

[Claudette]

RUNAWAY!!!!!
View attachment 250045

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., rushed to the defense of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Monday, saying only “graphic evidence” would warrant an impeachment gamble against President Trump.

“In the absence of very graphic evidence, it would be difficult to get the support in the Senate needed to make an impeachment successful. Again, my feeling is let’s see what Bob Mueller produces. But the evidence would have to be pretty overwhelming,” Schiff told CNN.

Across the caucus, Democrats have been asked to comment about Pelosi, D-Calif., abruptly shutting the door on impeachment in an interview published Monday.

Adam Schiff: Impeachment gamble not worth it without 'very graphic evidence'

Isn't he that whinny little shit that was vowing to impeach Trump a few days ago??

Now he's saying Pelousy is right?? That she won't push for impeachment??

I'd dearly like to know just what they are going to impeach him for??

Mueller's won't give them anything. Maybe they are getting smarter or just beginning to realize they don't have a leg to stand on.

You can't cure stupid.

 

[nat4900]

Actually, the problem with impeaching the President is that he has done absolutely NOTHING that rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." And if fact, with the "Russia collusion" hoax apparently dying a whimpering death, and "obstruction of justice" taking the top position, Schiff knows that none of the "obstruction of justice" claims passes the laugh test, when exposed to the light of day.

For example, Trump is said to have paid off the bimbo's in order to preserve his unsullied image of a faithful married man - for the voters - and not to keep his wife and kids in the dark. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Trump is said to have fired Comey to impede the now-ridiculous Russia investigation, and not because of his laundry list of blunders as FBI head - which had most Congressional Democrats screaming, "Off with his HEAD!" Riiiiiiiiiight.

It is not "political." Impeachment would simply make the Democrats look more like fools than they already do.

But I was assured by my moral and intellectual superiors for two years there was a mountain of evidence to impeach tRump.

Impeachment is a process that is dependent on the "jury".....and we all know that the senate republicans are scared shitless of Trump.....his tweets....AND, his cult members' devotion (like yours.)

Besides, democrats are waiting for Trump to FULLY and WHOLLY destroy the GOP......lol

 

[Lesh]

Investigations will continue tardlette. If the evidence is strong enough...there will be impeachment

 

[iceberg]

Actually, the problem with impeaching the President is that he has done absolutely NOTHING that rises to the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors." And if fact, with the "Russia collusion" hoax apparently dying a whimpering death, and "obstruction of justice" taking the top position, Schiff knows that none of the "obstruction of justice" claims passes the laugh test, when exposed to the light of day.

For example, Trump is said to have paid off the bimbo's in order to preserve his unsullied image of a faithful married man - for the voters - and not to keep his wife and kids in the dark. Riiiiiiiiiiiight.

Trump is said to have fired Comey to impede the now-ridiculous Russia investigation, and not because of his laundry list of blunders as FBI head - which had most Congressional Democrats screaming, "Off with his HEAD!" Riiiiiiiiiight.

It is not "political." Impeachment would simply make the Democrats look more like fools than they already do.

But I was assured by my moral and intellectual superiors for two years there was a mountain of evidence to impeach tRump.

Impeachment is a process that is dependent on the "jury".....and we all know that the senate republicans are scared shitless of Trump.....his tweets....AND, his cult members' devotion (like yours.)

Besides, democrats are waiting for Trump to FULLY and WHOLLY destroy the GOP......lol

yea, those scary tweets. the socialists may never recover that they can't shut down someone from talking.

must scare the fuck out of y'all.

scare a liberal - be a trump tweet for halloween.

 

[Claudette]

Investigations will continue tardlette. If the evidence is strong enough...there will be impeachment

You can always hope.

Good luck with that.

 

[Care4all]

If Congress does not get what Mueller reports, which at this point they are NOT going to see any of it, it all goes to Trump's pick for AG who will hold the findings back from congress, then going for an impeachment, without the Mueller investigative findings, is fruitless.

And it is going to be a long long battle in the Courts, to receive this info.

therefore, it is off the table, FOR NOW.

Fight like heck to win the Senate in 2020, just like they won the House in 2018, through their ideas and legislative plans, is the only thing they can do.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Nadler has already stated that there is no evidence of Obstruction of Justice against Trump, that the Mueller report will not have a case for Russian election collusion.

Post quotes and links. Not that I think you're a liar...but...well

Ya know...you're a Trumper so...

Bwahahahahahaha!!!

Your TDS is indeed strong, you fail to think of the possibility that I only care about the rule of law, never voted for Trump.

I posted what Nadler said in another thread, too bad you forgot it already, even though you posted replies in that thread to what I posted:

Nadler admission

Your reaction in the very next post

I replied to your dumb reply with is just the third post down from yours.

Your memory must be blocked due to the dreaded TDS disease.

I suggest you go away..................

 

[iceberg]

If Congress does not get what Mueller reports, which at this point they are NOT going to see any of it, it all goes to Trump's pick for AG who will hold the findings back from congress, then going for an impeachment, without the Mueller investigative findings, is fruitless.

And it is going to be a long long battle in the Courts, to receive this info.

therefore, it is off the table, FOR NOW.

Fight like heck to win the Senate in 2020, just like they won the House in 2018, through their ideas and legislative plans, is the only thing they can do.

why can't the left just build a better platform to attract voters?

also - the notion that trump could onto the mueller report is laughable at best. it's you buying some emotional insurance for when you don't get what you were after.

the hillary haters know it well.