Beauties or Bimbos?

The echo chamber is clearly on the left. That is why Fox news enjoys such high ratings. Most of the rest of the media cow tows to Obama's agenda.

Fox is a right wing propaganda outlet. Those that are liberal, independent, democratic and libertarians like to get their news from numerous outlets, then come up with their own opinions.The right wingers on the other hand only want to hear what they want to hear and nothing else, and let fox do all the thinking for them as thinking for yourself is "too hard" That's why they site on their fat asses all day being programmed by the BS from fox.
\

like there is no left wing echo chamber



MSNAACP
The ROOT
Huff Poo


among others

As far as I know, there is no left wing echo chamber. I get my news from various sources, mainly international English language news programs. They come from around the world: France, Russia, Israel, Qatar, the UK, etc. I like to know what the entire world thinks, not just the US. Too many people in the US have tunnel vision. Life in other parts of the world is not about the 'left wing' and the 'right wing.'
 
The women of FOX seem like they are chosen to appeal to the same kind of beauty one might find in a Miss USA pagaent.

In other words, they're appealing to middle aged white guys with very conventional taste in women.

What astounds me is how bloody stupid many of them are.

But that too, probably appeals to Fox's targeted demographic.

Care to provide an example of this supposed "stupidity?"
 
I don't think part of the definiton of bimbo is loose morals. When I hear the term, I just think it means a silly, empty headed female. Mrs. Bennet in PRIDE AND PREJUDICE would be, imo, a bimbo: a silly, foolish woman.

It usually implies the woman puts out, as in "bimbo eruption," a la Clinton.
 
The women of FOX seem like they are chosen to appeal to the same kind of beauty one might find in a Miss USA pagaent.

In other words, they're appealing to middle aged white guys with very conventional taste in women.

What astounds me is how bloody stupid many of them are.

But that too, probably appeals to Fox's targeted demographic.

Care to provide an example of this supposed "stupidity?"

Can you provide an example of when they are knowledgeable, insightful, have a broad knowledge of historical and current events, are cognizant of a wide range of knowledge about worldwide events and their significance, are well spoken and articulate, etc.? Have they spent time in the field, covering wars (civil and international), and insurrections? Do they have a CV that includes interviews with some of the most important figures of our times? Have they paid their dues in the small and large news rooms of this country? Have they paid their dues covering the news on the streets of our cities, towns and country sides? This is what a true journalist would be like. Can any of these women (and as well any of the men) on Fox News be described in those terms? What do they have to offer us as journalists? What is it about them, as journalists, that should earn our respect? Or are they just pretty faces (and bodies, apparently) who took a degree in communications, look good on camera, can read out loud well and have a nice smile?
 
To Pogo: You’re a fool and a liar; a fool for putting a lie in writing:

You're saying that conservatives have only one choice because they lack intelligence?

That's exactly what I said you said. Verbatim.
And it confirms what I asked before with "Conservatives watch FOX because their TV choices are severely limited" -- that what you're saying is that conservatives will only listen to an echo chamber that tells them what they want to hear. You've just reiterated it.

And a liar for slithering away from your first lie with another lie:

. . . that what you're saying is that conservatives will only listen to an echo chamber that tells them what they want to hear.

I can’t wait for the next chapter.
 
To Pogo: You’re a fool and a liar; a fool for putting a lie in writing:

You're saying that conservatives have only one choice because they lack intelligence?

That's exactly what I said you said. Verbatim.
And it confirms what I asked before with "Conservatives watch FOX because their TV choices are severely limited" -- that what you're saying is that conservatives will only listen to an echo chamber that tells them what they want to hear. You've just reiterated it.

Umm... yeah... those are your words. I cut 'n' pasted 'em. Maybe you don't recognize them when they're not screaming. Btw "lies" don't contain question marks. Might want to note for future reference. :eusa_whistle:

And a liar for slithering away from your first lie with another lie:

. . . that what you're saying is that conservatives will only listen to an echo chamber that tells them what they want to hear.

I can’t wait for the next chapter
.

The inevitable conclusion of what, again, your own words mean. That was the first thing I asked you in this thread -- and you confirmed it in post 42.
I may not agree with it but ...your words.
:dunno:
 
Last edited:
The women of FOX seem like they are chosen to appeal to the same kind of beauty one might find in a Miss USA pagaent.

In other words, they're appealing to middle aged white guys with very conventional taste in women.

What astounds me is how bloody stupid many of them are.

But that too, probably appeals to Fox's targeted demographic.

Well, they certainly don't pick their men that way. What's with Krauthammer? He looks like the Grinch.
 
The inevitable conclusion of what, again, your own words mean. That was the first thing I asked you in this thread -- and you confirmed it in post 42.
I may not agree with it but ...your words.
:dunno:

To Pogo: How did you get confirmation of your views out of anything I said here:

To Pogo: Intelligence limits choices. Nobody with an ounce of brains willingly tunes in to Left-wing talking points, liberal bias, and doublespeak. Socialists must force and/or trick anyone other liberals to listen. Brainwashing children in the public schools, required courses in universities, and the Democrat party’s ongoing efforts to bring back the discredited Fairness Doctrine (1949 to 1987) prove my case time and time again.

Learn from a conservative. I don’t read or listen to anything I don’t like when I know what’s coming. In addition to my format that annoys you, don’t read my messages if you don’t like what I say.

To Pogo: Interpreting my statements to support your views is fair enough. Adding a question mark after twisting my meaning into fact is a no-no. Not that a question mark changed your lie, but note that you failed to add the question mark in #60 permalink.

That's exactly what I said you said. Verbatim.
And it confirms what I asked before with "Conservatives watch FOX because their TV choices are severely limited" -- that what you're saying is that conservatives will only listen to an echo chamber that tells them what they want to hear. You've just reiterated it.
 
The women of FOX seem like they are chosen to appeal to the same kind of beauty one might find in a Miss USA pagaent.

In other words, they're appealing to middle aged white guys with very conventional taste in women.

What astounds me is how bloody stupid many of them are.

But that too, probably appeals to Fox's targeted demographic.

Well, they certainly don't pick their men that way. What's with Krauthammer? He looks like the Grinch.


The other half of the equation. Pairing young bimbos with crotchety old white geezers, as noted in the Atlantic article posted yesterday, plays to their audience of exactly that element. It's really quite the subtle psychological manipulation tool.

Fantasy is an integral part of what Fox does. The Krauthammers and O'Reillys and Hannitys play the male lead in a kind of subliminal news-porn.
 
Fox is a right wing propaganda outlet. Those that are liberal, independent, democratic and libertarians like to get their news from numerous outlets, then come up with their own opinions.The right wingers on the other hand only want to hear what they want to hear and nothing else, and let fox do all the thinking for them as thinking for yourself is "too hard" That's why they site on their fat asses all day being programmed by the BS from fox.
\

like there is no left wing echo chamber



MSNAACP
The ROOT
Huff Poo


among others

As far as I know, there is no left wing echo chamber. I get my news from various sources, mainly international English language news programs. They come from around the world: France, Russia, Israel, Qatar, the UK, etc. I like to know what the entire world thinks, not just the US. Too many people in the US have tunnel vision. Life in other parts of the world is not about the 'left wing' and the 'right wing.'


Nile_River.png
 
Foxy Ladies - Atlantic Mobile


Here's an article about FOX female makeup vs other networks.

Interesting viewpoints offered.

When did being sexy, pretty, hot or wearing sexy clothing and makeup become the fodder for news junky observers to psychobabble over?

Of course it is partly about the "sell". They all use various methods to draw in viewers. Too bad that most do not actually give the best straight factual news offerings.

I cut out the middlemen and women and prefer gathering my news from various means and venues but I see nothing that wow about pretty women on the networks. I do take issue with those that judge intelligence differently when the woman is beautiful.

Let's take a closer look at the sometimes assumed "brain power" of plainer women AND men in the news business.

Where'd Dreamy go?... :dunno:

:)

peace...
 
They got fine women of all colors/races on Fox so unless middle aged white guys are the only ones who love to look at beautiful women of all colors I have to disagree.

That's true, you have your choice of white, white, white, and any color hair you want, as long as it's bleach blonde :tongue:

It's clear fox just hires a bunch of teleprompter reading morons.

Loren Greene Black

lauren-green.jpg


Julie Banderas Hispanic

julie_banderas_jb4_aBoZz8d.sized.jpg


Michelle Malkin Philippine

Michelle-Malkin...3.jpg


Uma Pemmaraju Indian

Pemmaraju%20headshot.jpg


Shall I go on, coward?

Please do ! Michelle Malkin is a a Fox News Channel contributor and I have never seen her promoted as Fox News babe. I have never seen those other women on Fox "News".
 
They got fine women of all colors/races on Fox so unless middle aged white guys are the only ones who love to look at beautiful women of all colors I have to disagree.

That's true, you have your choice of white, white, white, and any color hair you want, as long as it's bleach blonde :tongue:

It's clear fox just hires a bunch of teleprompter reading morons.

Loren Greene Black

lauren-green.jpg


Julie Banderas Hispanic

julie_banderas_jb4_aBoZz8d.sized.jpg


Michelle Malkin Philippine

Michelle-Malkin...3.jpg


Uma Pemmaraju Indian

Pemmaraju%20headshot.jpg


Shall I go on, coward?

Yes, look at them.

Typical of the sort of beauty found in MISS AMERICA pagents.

You have a point, I suppose, but you are addressing it to a STRAW MAN, Lad.

YOu imagine I am discussing race...I am not.

I am discussing a TYPE of beauty.
 
They all do it...but admittedly - Fox does it the most.
Not only do they obviously hire hotties - they dress them like party girls...

Most jobs would fire you if you came to work with a dress that short. :lmao:

Been out of the workforce a long time?

Been online a short time? That post is a year old. Not sure Amy even exists any more.
Why are we dredging up this thread? What's the point?
 
Most jobs would fire you if you came to work with a dress that short. :lmao:

Been out of the workforce a long time?

Been online a short time? That post is a year old. Not sure Amy even exists any more.
Why are we dredging up this thread? What's the point?

Lol...

I don't know I saw a conversation and joined. Good thing we've got you to keep things in line :redface:
 
It's a Murdoch thing. Flag-waving, sensationalism and hot chicks.

Read The Sun.

And let's not forget the most important thing.

Fair and balanced News.

As "balanced" as the News of the World. :D

Toro has it exactly right. Tabloid rags are where Murdoch comes from, and Fox Noise is a TV version of it; a gossip channel that simply replaces celebrities with politicians. And it's always gossip about politicians, never analysis about policies. Because the personal is emotional, and emotion $ells. News doesn't.

That's exactly why this post:
MSNBC has Rachel Maddow.
That tells you all you need to know.
That's the beauty that they lead off with.

Has it right too, though not for the reason he thinks.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top