Barr Intends to Investigate the FBI Russia Collusion Behavior

[westwall]

About Gawd Danged time.


Barr Says He's Reviewing the Conduct of FBI Probe Into Trump Campaign

Attorney General William Barr announced Tuesday he is “reviewing the conduct” of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)’s counterintelligence into the Trump campaign under the Obama administration.
“I am reviewing the conduct of the investigation and trying to get my arms around all the aspects of the counterintelligence investigation that was conducted during the summer of 2016,” Barr said while testifying before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies.

Barr also said he has heard the ongoing Justice Department inspector general investigation into how the DOJ under the Obama administration obtained surveillance warrants on Trump campaign members will wrap up in May or June.
​

Lock them all up if they undermined our President and throw away the danged key.

How dare the FBI look into credible threats and do their job. This needs immediate investigation.

Barr better get Trey Gowdy on this immediately given his track record of pointless investigations.

Any bets on when these fucks are going to decide to suspend the Constitution?

They weren't 'credible threats' and the political appointees in the FBI knew it.

All of these findings show the FBI did have credible threats.

View attachment 255180

Thats why each wikipedia page has references to the source of information. The page on russian election interference has more then 500 reference. Also, wikipedia is 99.5 percent accurate.

No it ain't. wiki is so bad that most universities, as bad as they have become, won't allow wiki to be used as a source.

 

[Zorro!]

About Gawd Danged time.

Attorney General William Barr announced Tuesday he is “reviewing the conduct” of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)’s counterintelligence into the Trump campaign under the Obama administration.
“I am reviewing the conduct of the investigation and trying to get my arms around all the aspects of the counterintelligence investigation that was conducted during the summer of 2016,” Barr said while testifying before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies.

Barr also said he has heard the ongoing Justice Department inspector general investigation into how the DOJ under the Obama administration obtained surveillance warrants on Trump campaign members will wrap up in May or June.
​

Lock them all up if they undermined our President and throw away the danged key.

How dare the FBI look into credible threats and do their job. This needs immediate investigation.

Barr better get Trey Gowdy on this immediately given his track record of pointless investigations.

Any bets on when these fucks are going to decide to suspend the Constitution?

They weren't 'credible threats' and the political appointees in the FBI knew it.

the FBI did have credible threats.

You didn't answer the questions:

1. Has Mueller charged her with spying? She was cleared to enter the country by the Obama Administration.
2. Is it illegal to speak with Russians about negative things about your opponent?
3. Will Steele be charged given that his sources for the Dossier dirt were Kremlin associated Russian agents?

1) if youre talking about Veselnitskaya, she was allowed in for case work unrelated to Trump campaign.
2) its illegal to accept gift from foreign government, but its legal to pay for opposition research from foreigners. The "gift" can be dirt on opponent. The reason gift is illegal is because it results in quid pro quo.
3) no, because of item 2. Additionally, Steele was working with anti-kremlin Russians (i.e. Skripal poisoning)

Weird how Mueller completely missed this. Did you try sending Mueller an email?

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

 

[Zorro!]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

ERIC HOLDER INSERTS HIS YAP. TELLS BARR THAT IT"S "INVESTIGATING" NOT SPYING. But when you’re engaged in illegal surveillance of a political candidate on behalf of the opposing political party, “spying” is the nicest word that comes to mind.

 

[Leo123]

About Gawd Danged time.


Barr Says He's Reviewing the Conduct of FBI Probe Into Trump Campaign

Attorney General William Barr announced Tuesday he is “reviewing the conduct” of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)’s counterintelligence into the Trump campaign under the Obama administration.
“I am reviewing the conduct of the investigation and trying to get my arms around all the aspects of the counterintelligence investigation that was conducted during the summer of 2016,” Barr said while testifying before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies.

Barr also said he has heard the ongoing Justice Department inspector general investigation into how the DOJ under the Obama administration obtained surveillance warrants on Trump campaign members will wrap up in May or June.
​

Lock them all up if they undermined our President and throw away the danged key.

How dare the FBI look into credible threats and do their job. This needs immediate investigation.

Barr better get Trey Gowdy on this immediately given his track record of pointless investigations.

Any bets on when these fucks are going to decide to suspend the Constitution?

They weren't 'credible threats' and the political appointees in the FBI knew it.

All of these findings show the FBI did have credible threats.

View attachment 255180

Thats why each wikipedia page has references to the source of information. The page on russian election interference has more then 500 reference. Also, wikipedia is 99.5 percent accurate.

Yeah 500 fake references.

 

[dudmuck]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

Put on your Hannity tin foil hat.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Ken star says hold on something big is coming from Barr

He says Barr knows something !!

Ken Starr: Bill Barr Knows Something - What He Said Was a 'Stay Tuned America' Statement (VIdeo)

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Much like the Left believed Trump colluded with Russia and would be impeached if not charged criminally, the right thinks our criminal government will actually hold criminals in government accountable. I don’t think so.

It's almost like we, the people are no longer in control of our government. We would be better off simply dissolving the government and summarily executing all those government asshole.

I am to the point now where a stateless society is more attractive than the criminal organization in control.

.

 

[westwall]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

Put on your Hannity tin foil hat.

Naaaah, you clowns have already cornered the market on tin foil hats. No way we could ever compete with you silly people on that front!

 

[dudmuck]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

Put on your Hannity tin foil hat.

Naaaah, you clowns have already cornered the market on tin foil hats. No way we could ever compete with you silly people on that front!

The tin foil hat comes from believing in conspiracy theories without any supporting evidence. You maga people have the monopoly on that one.

 

[westwall]

Barr is ready to become the best ever AG and a hero that saved America

Now there will be a stampede of real patriot heroes all set to stop the whole crooked deep state!!

Put on your Hannity tin foil hat.

Naaaah, you clowns have already cornered the market on tin foil hats. No way we could ever compete with you silly people on that front!

The tin foil hat comes from believing in conspiracy theories without any supporting evidence. You maga people have the monopoly on that one.

Oh? You mean all of the unfounded claims that trump was colluding with the russkis? You do know that the only evidence that exists is for the collusion between hillary and the Ukrainians. Right?

 

[dudmuck]

How dare the FBI look into credible threats and do their job. This needs immediate investigation.

Barr better get Trey Gowdy on this immediately given his track record of pointless investigations.

Any bets on when these fucks are going to decide to suspend the Constitution?

They weren't 'credible threats' and the political appointees in the FBI knew it.

All of these findings show the FBI did have credible threats.

View attachment 255180

Thats why each wikipedia page has references to the source of information. The page on russian election interference has more then 500 reference. Also, wikipedia is 99.5 percent accurate.

No it ain't. wiki is so bad that most universities, as bad as they have become, won't allow wiki to be used as a source.

Wikipedia can be used as a starting point for research, but only when citation is provided. The student must evaluate the source of the information.
"Remember that any encyclopedia is a starting point for research, not an ending point."
If the cited reference is reliable, then that portion of wiki is reliable.

 

[westwall]

They weren't 'credible threats' and the political appointees in the FBI knew it.

All of these findings show the FBI did have credible threats.

View attachment 255180

Thats why each wikipedia page has references to the source of information. The page on russian election interference has more then 500 reference. Also, wikipedia is 99.5 percent accurate.

No it ain't. wiki is so bad that most universities, as bad as they have become, won't allow wiki to be used as a source.

Wikipedia can be used as a starting point for research, but only when citation is provided. The student must evaluate the source of the information.
"Remember that any encyclopedia is a starting point for research, not an ending point."
If the cited reference is reliable, then that portion of wiki is reliable.

Funny how you are so desperate to deflect that you respond to an old post and IGNORE the very pertinent one. Typical lying progressive silly person.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Gallup poll shows trump now rising fast

Why.

They are trying not to be caught trying to rig elections with a fraud set up poll

 

[beautress]

Much like the Left believed Trump colluded with Russia and would be impeached if not charged criminally, the right thinks our criminal government will actually hold criminals in government accountable. I don’t think so.

They have to, gipper. One of their key players ought to have had her feet put to the flame at Yale University in 1970 for holding the Administration building there in a shut down position by holding an AK-47 at the door for student emphasis.

​

 

[JimBowie1958]

Who investigates the investigators when the system has been corrupted and the media is part of the conspiracy? We'll see.

I would guess an DOJ Inspector General who has been pissed off by the Establishment crony network.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Don't let them.

Not going to happen. The people don’t control the media. The Ruling Class does.

One of Trumps biggest successes was his ability to get through the Establishment Media Phalanx.

The gap grows wider with each passing day and their control of social media is about to get blown away as well.

 

[OldLady]

1) if youre talking about Veselnitskaya, she was allowed in for case work unrelated to Trump campaign.
2) its illegal to accept gift from foreign government, but its legal to pay for opposition research from foreigners. The "gift" can be dirt on opponent. The reason gift is illegal is because it results in quid pro quo.
3) no, because of item 2. Additionally, Steele was working with anti-kremlin Russians (i.e. Skripal poisoning)

That opposition research (Steele Dossier) was used to get a FISA warrant. There was nothing valid in that Dossier it was a DNC paid for hit piece yet the FBI used to to get a FISA warrant to wiretap and it is the reason for this 2 year long, costly witch-hunt. People need to be accountable all the way up to Obama.

The FBI was looking into the fact that the Trump campaign was swarming with Russian contacts and they knew the Russians were making advances toward the campaign. What part of Russian influence worming its way into the highest reaches of American government don't you understand? If you don't see a problem with that, thank God at least the FBI does.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Much like the Left believed Trump colluded with Russia and would be impeached if not charged criminally, the right thinks our criminal government will actually hold criminals in government accountable. I don’t think so.

It's almost like we, the people are no longer in control of our government.
.

We the People have not been in control since the Federal income tax (16th A) was passed despite the very questionable process in which it was considered to have passed, for example, the state of Oklahoma inverted the language of the amendment, but it was counted as approving anyway.

Tax protester Sixteenth Amendment arguments - Wikipedia

The William J. Benson contention is essentially that the legislatures of various states passed ratifying resolutions in which the quoted text of the Amendment differed from the text proposed by Congress in terms of capitalization, spelling of words, or punctuation marks (e.g. semi-colons instead of commas), and that these differences made the ratification invalid. Benson makes other assertions including claims that one or more states rejected the Amendment and that the state or states were falsely reported as having ratified the Amendment. As explained below, the Benson arguments have been rejected in every court case where they have been raised, and were explicitly ruled to be fraudulent in 2007.

Benson contended that in Kentucky, the legislature acted on the amendment without having received it from the governor, and that the governor of the state was to transmit the proposed amendment to the state legislature. Benson also contended that the version of the amendment that the Kentucky legislature made up and acted upon omitted the words "on income" from the text, and that the legislature therefore was not even voting on an income tax. Benson asserted that once this error was corrected, the Kentucky senate rejected the amendment, although Philander Knox counted Kentucky as having approved it.

Benson also contended that in Oklahoma, the legislature changed the wording of the amendment so that its meaning was virtually the opposite of what was intended by Congress, and that this was the version they sent back to Knox. Benson alleged that Knox counted Oklahoma as having approved it, despite a memo from his chief legal counsel, Reuben Clark, that states were not allowed to change the proposal in any way.

Benson argued that attorneys who studied the subject had agreed that Kentucky and Oklahoma should not have been counted as approvals by Philander Knox, and that if any state could be shown to have violated its own state constitution or laws in its approval process, then that state's approval would have to be thrown out.
....

Benson and Beckman did not discover anything; they rediscovered something that Secretary Knox considered in 1913. Thirty-eight states ratified the sixteenth amendment, and thirty-seven sent formal instruments of ratification to the Secretary of State. (Minnesota notified the Secretary orally, and additional states ratified later; we consider only those Secretary Knox considered.) Only four instruments repeat the language of the sixteenth amendment exactly as Congress approved it. The others contain errors of diction, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. The text Congress transmitted to the states was: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." Many of the instruments neglected to capitalize "States", and some capitalized other words instead. The instrument from Illinois had "remuneration" in place of "enumeration"; the instrument from Missouri substituted "levy" for "lay"; the instrument from Washington had "income" not "incomes"; others made similar blunders.

Thomas insists that because the states did not approve exactly the same text, the amendment did not go into effect. Secretary Knox considered this argument. The Solicitor of the Department of State drew up a list of the errors in the instruments and – taking into account both the triviality of the deviations and the treatment of earlier amendments that had experienced more substantial problems – advised the Secretary that he was authorized to declare the amendment adopted. The Secretary did so.

Although Thomas urges us to take the view of several state courts that only agreement on the literal text may make a legal document effective, the Supreme Court follows the "enrolled bill rule". If a legislative document is authenticated in regular form by the appropriate officials, the court treats that document as properly adopted. Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649, 36 L.Ed. 294, 12 S.Ct. 495 (1892). The principle is equally applicable to constitutional amendments. See Leser v. Garnett, 258 U.S. 130, 66 L.Ed. 505, 42 S.Ct. 217 (1922), which treats as conclusive the declaration of the Secretary of State that the nineteenth amendment had been adopted. In United States v. Foster, 789 F.2d. 457, 462–463, n.6 (7th Cir. 1986), we relied on Leser, as well as the inconsequential nature of the objections in the face of the 73-year acceptance of the effectiveness of the sixteenth amendment, to reject a claim similar to Thomas's. See also Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433, 83 L. Ed. 1385, 59 S. Ct. 972 (1939) (questions about ratification of amendments may be nonjusticiable). Secretary Knox declared that enough states had ratified the sixteenth amendment. The Secretary's decision is not transparently defective. We need not decide when, if ever, such a decision may be reviewed in order to know that Secretary Knox's decision is now beyond review.

— United States v. Thomas​

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Now the people have awakened to see the fake media guilty of high treason

Conspiracy Media CNN and MSNBC Still Down in Ratings Since Mueller Report