PostmodernProph
....fully immersed....
obviously I'm not stupid enough to believe that a majority of scholars actually believe that.....I will concede a majority of atheist scholars believe that.....but after all, who actually listens to atheists who claim to be scholars of biblical theology.........of course I am.....none of them have merit......You are just blanket saying that all 46 have no merit.
no we don't all know it....some atheist somewhere claimed it and you keep repeating it......what we know is that that particular argument is one of those without merit.....We all know that the bible was written by hearsay.
I'm pretty sure that's been the plan all along.......all of them are worthless.....Fuck all 46 arguments.
One item of real evidence......just as I asked for before......What more proof should I need?
So you don't believe the majority of scholars when they admit that, for example:
Authorship of the Bible - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
According to tradition and early church fathers, the author of Mark is Mark the Evangelist, the companion of the apostle Peter. The gospel, however, appears to rely on several underlying sources, varying in form and in theology, and which tells against the tradition that the gospel was based on Peter's preaching. Various elements within the gospel, including the importance of the authority of Peter and the broadness of the basic theology, suggest that the author wrote in Syria or Palestine for a non-Jewish Christian community which had earlier absorbed the influence of pre-Pauline beliefs and then developed them further independent of Paul.
In other words Mark didn't write Mark.
And Matthew, Luke & John didn't write their books either. Amazing so many Christians don't know this. But even the ones who do somehow are able to explain it away.
All claims of Jesus come from hearsay.
Did Jesus exist