Questioner
Senior Member
- Nov 26, 2019
- 1,593
- 84
- 50
- Banned
- #41
True Christianity is an important and influential part of American, and Western heritage.Due to popular request I am starting a thread covering the fact that America was begun as a Christian nation. Be forewarned, I will not respond to posts that are more than twelve or so paragraphs. If we are going to discuss the issue, it has to be a few things at a time. Bottom line: America was founded as a Christian nation.
As soon as one says that the atheists and other non-believers will start with their lies and straw man arguments. They will tell you that I just said America was founded as a theocracy. AMERICA WAS NOT FOUNDED AS A THEOCRACY. IT WAS FOUNDED AS A REPUBLIC BASED UPON CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES.
Politics is nothing more than religion in action. Our sense of right and wrong are all predicated on moral values and we got from biblical precepts. The very first governing document of the New World was the Mayflower Compact. It states:
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.
Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and “advancements of the Christian faith”
Okay, I’m well aware that St. Augustine is the oldest city in the U.S, the Spaniards were there before the colonists and that other colonists preceded those on the Mayflower. That Mayflower Compact was the first GOVERNING document of the New World. Colonization and founding are synonymous.
The First Charter of Virginia of 1606 stated:
“We greatly commending, and graciously accepting of, their Desires for the Furtherance of so noble a Work, which may, by the Providence of Almighty God, hereafter tend to the Glory his Divine Majesty, in propagating of Christian Religion to such People, as yet live in Darkness and miserable Ignorance of the true Knowledge and Worship of God, and may in time bring the Infidels and Savages, living in those parts, to human Civility, to a settled and quiet government.”
Similar language attesting to our Christian roots during this period would be the Second Charter of Virginia of 1609, Third Charter of Virginia 1611 – 1612, The Charter of New England 1620, Ordinances For Virginia, July 24, 1621, The Charter of Massachusetts Bay 1629, and I will add more to the chorological order each time I post.
In 1630, John Winthrop delivered a sermon aboard the Arbella as it sailed toward the New World. That sermon has been cited by U.S. statesmen including, but not limited to JFK and Ronald Reagan. It defines WHO the colonists were and what their objective was in the New World. Any sermon being quoted by American politicians 300 years later deserves to be examined. Here is a link to it and it is a must read if you want to add intelligent commentary to this thread:
https://www.casa-arts.org/cms/lib/PA01925203/Centricity/Domain/50/A Model of Christian Charity.pdf More to come
Even if, in actuality, many of the aspects attributed to Christianity coexist in other civilization, it's nevertheless pure historical revisionism to try to complete eliminate Christianity from our memories.
Even the Common Law system which the states are governed by is a "religious" institution of sorts, founded on religious principles such as the Golden Rule - respect for people, their families, their property, their autonomy, and so forth; may atheists interestingly deny the existence of any of this rights and so forth, putting them completely at odds with the Common Law and its history, function, and founding principles, much as some of these principles (e.x. property rights, personal autonomy) were also a part of the 10 Commandments and the legal system of Israel during the Old Testament era.
By that alone, the states as well as Britain would be right to ban any atheistic worldview which is potentially antagonist to the Law and its founding principles. (Marxism, for instance wishes to abolish all private property, which is an ideology immediately at odds with the law and its acknowledgement and respect for property rights and so forth).