Accepting the results of the election...

[Coyote]

If Trump wins, few on the Left will accept it. In fact, some think the Left will take extreme measures to invalidate a Trump win.

You must remember this age old truism. Whatever the Left accuses their opponents of, they are guilty of.

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

YOU have got to be kidding!
Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies
Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, stepped down from the campaign Tuesday, a day after Scott Foval was fired from his post as national field director of Americans United for Change.

The first video shows Democratic strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops.

Project Veritas released a second video Tuesday showing Mr. Foval brainstorming over ways to commit voter fraud, such as by busing people from one state to another, while appearing to indicate that it had already been done in Iowa.

“It’s a pretty easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re busing people in,’” Mr. Foval said. “Well, you know what? We’ve been busing people in to deal with you f–ing assholes for 50 years, and we’re not going to stop now. We’re just going to find a different way to do it. So, I mean I grew up with that idea. They used to bus people out to Iowa. If they needed people, there we’d bus people out to Iowa.”
Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Inconvenient facts for the partisan shills. That was funny, Breitbart and O'keefe are not reliable....and the video exposing the dems is in the link. LMAO

You you trying to claim you yourself are not a partisan shill?

 

[Coyote]

What results are we talking about? The results reported by the media?
That's the problem in this country, even those that despise the media are willing to accept what's reported.

I asked this on another thread, no answers.

When is the President officially elected?

When the election is over and the votes counted and the results certified.

 

[gipper]

If Trump wins, few on the Left will accept it. In fact, some think the Left will take extreme measures to invalidate a Trump win.

You must remember this age old truism. Whatever the Left accuses their opponents of, they are guilty of.

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

You should fear a Cankles win far more than a Trump win, but this would require you to think.

We obviousy differ on that. However the issue is not WHO wins - it's accepting the results of an election - not undermining the very process itself and calling for violence.

And again....the Left WILL NOT ACCEPT A TRUMP WIN...DUMMY.

 

[Coyote]

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

Nah, she's just encouraging violence to win.

Fact-Check: Yes, the Hillary Clinton Campaign Used Activists to Disrupt Trump Rallies - Breitbart

Breitbart and O'Keefe are hardly a reputable source for fact checking...

Yeah but you'll spew Snopes in a heartbeat ya miserable partisan shill. You're so transparent we can see through you...and we see what's going on here

Snopes at least offers sources to back track on. Let's stick to facts (ya miserable partisan shill)...

Where has Hillary encouraged violence?

We have plenty of examples of Trump's own words encouraging his supporters NOT to accept the results of the election and condoning violence.

Save it, Snopes is a leftist loon site....little help for ya, I'm no noob at this

Where has Hillary encouraged violence? If you can't answer that, then just say so.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If Trump wins, few on the Left will accept it. In fact, some think the Left will take extreme measures to invalidate a Trump win.

You must remember this age old truism. Whatever the Left accuses their opponents of, they are guilty of.

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

YOU have got to be kidding!
Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies
Robert Creamer, founder of Democracy Advocates and the husband of Rep. Janice D. Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, stepped down from the campaign Tuesday, a day after Scott Foval was fired from his post as national field director of Americans United for Change.

The first video shows Democratic strategists discussing how they hire agitators — including union members, homeless people and the mentally ill — to incite violence by provoking Trump supporters on camera at campaign stops.

Project Veritas released a second video Tuesday showing Mr. Foval brainstorming over ways to commit voter fraud, such as by busing people from one state to another, while appearing to indicate that it had already been done in Iowa.

“It’s a pretty easy thing for Republicans to say, ‘Well, they’re busing people in,’” Mr. Foval said. “Well, you know what? We’ve been busing people in to deal with you f–ing assholes for 50 years, and we’re not going to stop now. We’re just going to find a different way to do it. So, I mean I grew up with that idea. They used to bus people out to Iowa. If they needed people, there we’d bus people out to Iowa.”
Undercover video shows Democrats saying they hire agitators to disrupt Donald Trump events

Inconvenient facts for the partisan shills. That was funny, Breitbart and O'keefe are not reliable....and the video exposing the dems is in the link. LMAO

You you trying to claim you yourself are not a partisan shill?

I'm a conservative and will back anyone with conservative values. I'm no Trump fan and I hope with every fiber of my being Hillary Clinton keels over and this nation is rid of her once and for all.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Nah, she's just encouraging violence to win.

Fact-Check: Yes, the Hillary Clinton Campaign Used Activists to Disrupt Trump Rallies - Breitbart

Breitbart and O'Keefe are hardly a reputable source for fact checking...

Yeah but you'll spew Snopes in a heartbeat ya miserable partisan shill. You're so transparent we can see through you...and we see what's going on here

Snopes at least offers sources to back track on. Let's stick to facts (ya miserable partisan shill)...

Where has Hillary encouraged violence?

We have plenty of examples of Trump's own words encouraging his supporters NOT to accept the results of the election and condoning violence.

Save it, Snopes is a leftist loon site....little help for ya, I'm no noob at this

Where has Hillary encouraged violence? If you can't answer that, then just say so.

Blah, blah, blah. If you think she and her minions are not behind this there is no help for you. You're lost...

 

[Iceweasel]

I have never seen words like that or attempts to undermine the entire process from any candidate before - not from the right, not from the left. This isn't a left vs right issue.

I've never seen the question asked before. Did it bother you that Gore held us up for two months after the election? My guess is no.

The left is running on faux outrage because it's the only way they can make their candidate look better.

 

[Coyote]

If Trump wins, few on the Left will accept it. In fact, some think the Left will take extreme measures to invalidate a Trump win.

You must remember this age old truism. Whatever the Left accuses their opponents of, they are guilty of.

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

You should fear a Cankles win far more than a Trump win, but this would require you to think.

We obviousy differ on that. However the issue is not WHO wins - it's accepting the results of an election - not undermining the very process itself and calling for violence.

And again....the Left WILL NOT ACCEPT A TRUMP WIN...DUMMY.

And you support that with what? Is Hillary urging her followers to reject it? To violence? What evidence do you have for your claim?

 

[Coyote]

Breitbart and O'Keefe are hardly a reputable source for fact checking...

Yeah but you'll spew Snopes in a heartbeat ya miserable partisan shill. You're so transparent we can see through you...and we see what's going on here

Snopes at least offers sources to back track on. Let's stick to facts (ya miserable partisan shill)...

Where has Hillary encouraged violence?

We have plenty of examples of Trump's own words encouraging his supporters NOT to accept the results of the election and condoning violence.

Save it, Snopes is a leftist loon site....little help for ya, I'm no noob at this

Where has Hillary encouraged violence? If you can't answer that, then just say so.

Blah, blah, blah. If you think she and her minions are not behind this there is no help for you. You're lost...

Ok, you can't answer it

 

[Kosh]

One of the fundamental pillars of our democratic system accepting the results of an election, and the peaceful transition of power.

This is the first election where both could be fundamentally threatened by pre-election rhetoric and inflammatory statements.

Folks are now bringing up Al Gore, in his election against Bush as if it were somehow equivalent. But is it?

The Florida vote was extremely close - close enough to demand a recount which was within a candidates legal rights. When it was finally decided, by the courts - Gore graciously and completely accepted the outcome. There was no talk about "rigged" elections from Mr. Gore.

But the fundamental difference is this: all this occurred AFTER the election and Gore accepted the court's verdict.

There was no pre-election claims (whenever the polls dropped) about rigged elections, about his crooked opponent rigging things, etc. undermining the very electoral process in this country. This is a first from a presidential candidate, and it's dangerous because he flirts with it and encourages his supporters with it. They can't possibly lose - because it's "rigged".

I hated that Bush won - not once, but twice - felt like doomsday. But we survived as a country (and for those who hate Obama - we'll still survive as a country).

I'm horrified that supporters of Trump, encouraged BY Trump's rhetoric are saying these things...

Trump’s supporters talk rebellion, assassination at his rallies - The Boston Globe

And if Trump doesn’t win, some are even openly talking about violent rebellion and assassination, as fantastical and unhinged as that may seem.


“If she’s in office, I hope we can start a coup. She should be in prison or shot. That’s how I feel about it,” Dan Bowman, a 50-year-old contractor, said of Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee. “We’re going to have a revolution and take them out of office if that’s what it takes. There’s going to be a lot of bloodshed. But that’s what it’s going to take. . . . I would do whatever I can for my country.”

He then placed a Trump mask on his face and posed for pictures.

Trump’s campaign has taken a sharp turn toward such dark warnings in recent days. He says he is a victim of conspiracies, portrays himself as a martyr to the cause of the right wing, and is stoking anger in advance of what may be a defeat on Nov. 8.

Trump has suggested that the Secret Service protecting Clinton should be disarmed and “see what happens to her,” and that “Second Amendment people” could take matters into their own hands if she wins and appoints judges who support gun control. But his campaign disavowed some of the remarks of his supporters on Saturday after this article was posted online.​

Trump Supporters Call For Violent Coup If He Loses, Vow To Racially Profile Minority Voters

Steve Webb, a 61-year-old carpenter, told the Globe he plans to heed Trump's call to "watch your precincts" on Election Day.


“I’ll look for . . . well, it’s called racial profiling. Mexicans. Syrians. People who can’t speak American,” he said. “I’m going to go right up behind them. I’ll do everything legally. I want to see if they are accountable. I’m not going to do anything illegal. I’m going to make them a little bit nervous.”​

And from: Trump’s supporters talk rebellion, assassination at his rallies - The Boston Globe

Fergus Cullen, former chairman of the New Hampshire GOP, said it was an incredibly important moment in 2000 when Democrat Al Gore gave a speech saying he accepted the results of the Supreme Court decision to award the majority of electoral votes and presidential victory to George W. Bush.

“Had he not done that, or done so halfheartedly, or even suggested that he’d been robbed, or otherwise tried to delegitimize the results, it would have been a huge blow to our democratic process,” Cullen said.

Cullen expects Trump’s warnings about a rigged election to get even uglier in coming weeks, and he fears they will incite violence if Trump loses.

“That’s really scary,” Cullen said, recounting the violence at Trump rallies around the country leading up to the Republican National Convention. “In this country, we’ve always had recriminations after one side loses. But we haven’t had riots. We haven’t had mobs that act out with violence against supporters of the other side.’’

“There’s no telling what his supporters would be willing to do at the slightest encouragement from their candidate,” he said.​

As you far left drones keep proving that you will not accept any election if you loose!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Yeah but you'll spew Snopes in a heartbeat ya miserable partisan shill. You're so transparent we can see through you...and we see what's going on here

Snopes at least offers sources to back track on. Let's stick to facts (ya miserable partisan shill)...

Where has Hillary encouraged violence?

We have plenty of examples of Trump's own words encouraging his supporters NOT to accept the results of the election and condoning violence.

Save it, Snopes is a leftist loon site....little help for ya, I'm no noob at this

Where has Hillary encouraged violence? If you can't answer that, then just say so.

Blah, blah, blah. If you think she and her minions are not behind this there is no help for you. You're lost...

Ok, you can't answer it

I did answer it you deluded loon. You've become very annoying in your quest to defend a corrupt old hag

 

[Iceweasel]

We have plenty of examples of Trump's own words encouraging his supporters NOT to accept the results of the election and condoning violence.

Can you be specific? I haven't heard that.

 

[Preacher]

If Trump wins, few on the Left will accept it. In fact, some think the Left will take extreme measures to invalidate a Trump win.

You must remember this age old truism. Whatever the Left accuses their opponents of, they are guilty of.

If Trump wins, always possible - I would accept it. I would be utterly disgusted at the electorate, I would truly fear for our country's future and pray that Congress can keep him in check (since Trump doesn't seem to realize that the POTUS is not synominous with CEO) and I would count down the years, months and days to the next election.

I would NOT say it was rigged. I would NOT encourage violence. What's more - I haven't seen Clinton encouraging violence if she doesn't win.

Republicans don't rig elections. More honor and integrity than that. Democrats have a history of it.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

What results are we talking about? The results reported by the media?
That's the problem in this country, even those that despise the media are willing to accept what's reported.

I asked this on another thread, no answers.

When is the President officially elected?

When the election is over and the votes counted and the results certified.

No, voters don't elect the president. They elect electors who then vote in the Electoral College. The EC elects the president.

 

[Defiant1]

What results are we talking about? The results reported by the media?
That's the problem in this country, even those that despise the media are willing to accept what's reported.

I asked this on another thread, no answers.

When is the President officially elected?

When the election is over and the votes counted and the results certified.

And when is that? It's wrong, BTW

 

[Coyote]

I have never seen words like that or attempts to undermine the entire process from any candidate before - not from the right, not from the left. This isn't a left vs right issue.

I've never seen the question asked before. Did it bother you that Gore held us up for two months after the election? My guess is no.

The left is running on faux outrage because it's the only way they can make their candidate look better.

If Gore had not accepted the results of the courts I would have been bothered. If Gore had preceded the election with this kind of rhetoric I would have been as worried then as I am now. If he encouraged violence in anticipation of losing - even worse.

Can you move beyond left/right or partisanship and see the issue for what it is? Transpose Hillary and Donald. What if it were Hillary iterating that rhetoric?

 

[Iceweasel]

As you far left drones keep proving that you will not accept any election if you loose!

Yep. Many said Bush was not their president. And some still claim Florida was stolen or handed over by the evil Supremes.

The lefties are hypocrites.

 

[Preacher]

If Wallace was on the ball he should have asked the question like this "Mr Trump, if you win the election will you accept the results?"

What's he going to say, no? And he would have been immediately exposed for pushing a bullshit lie about any 'rigging' of elections. Which is exactly what it is. It is Trump whining about losing ahead of him losing so his gigantic ego can feel a little better about being rejected by an entire nation in favor of a woman.

Because then we would know he won such a large landslide the cheating by the democrats was smashed anyways....say he won by 10% since the democrats cheating and rigging it is actually 12-15%

 

[Coyote]

What results are we talking about? The results reported by the media?
That's the problem in this country, even those that despise the media are willing to accept what's reported.

I asked this on another thread, no answers.

When is the President officially elected?

When the election is over and the votes counted and the results certified.

No, voters don't elect the president. They elect electors who then vote in the Electoral College. The EC elects the president.

True, though usually they line up.

 

[SassyIrishLass]