As it stands now, the veto power is placed solely in the hands of the woman. The man is completely at the mercy of the woman's whim. If a woman chooses to keep a child the man is willing to have aborted, then the man should have a legal avenue to be absolved of all responsibility for the child from that point forward. As we all know, that is not the case.
It's never going to be 50-50 fair, but it could be more fair than it is.
Exactly, there is a severe double standard. When a woman has the sole choice, she may want to have a baby even though the man may want to abort it. In this case, the man is stuck with child-spport and as far as opinion goes, "He should have thought about that, now he's taking responsibility for his actions." If the man wants to keep the baby, and the woman wants to abort, it's all of a sudden ok. Now the woman gets off from dealing with her responsibility for her own actions, while the man is punished and must mourn the loss of his offspring. If you could imagine the feeling a woman would get if the man had SOLE say in it. If you wanted to have the baby, but your husband, boyfriend, lover, etc...wanted to abort it, you'd feel as though you've lost a child.
Like GunnyL said, it will never be completely equal, but I feel it should be more fair than that. If the man is willing to take responsibility and raise his child that the woman wants to abort, I say allow the child to be born and give it to the man. Good Post Gunny