Sounds like subjective truth and moral relativity to me, but if that's what floats your boat, so be it. Personally I believe that is setting you up for predictable surprises.I believe there are circumstances where it's acceptable for some.You don't believe it is wrong to end a human life?What I don't grasp is your belief that something is morally wrong because you think it's morally wrong. Not everyone agrees with you.No, my hypothetical included a constitutional amendment. In my hypothetical, forced abortions are perfectly legal. You seem to have a problem with legal forced abortions. Why is that?Am I mistaken then in my belief you want abortion to be illegal?I don't believe I did. What I did was to play back for you what you have told me. In effect, I am asking you if I got it right. Please tell me what I got wrong. So, just to be clear... YOU endorse abortion because it is legal. Not because if it is right. But you will draw the line at forced abortions even if it is made legal. Right?
As far as your hypothetical ... again ... it would be unconstitutional. I'm not about to dive any deeper into your pool of hypotheticals because there could be no end to it. If you can't make your point using reality, then you don't really have a solid point to begin with.
And as before, legal abortions are not murder. Murder is the unlawful act of killing another human. But in our society, we make certain exceptions, abortion being one of them.
Again, the point of this hypothetical is to point out the flaws in moral relativity and of defining right and wrong by legalities. You don't seem to grasp this concept.