A well regulated militia.

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?
No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
 
Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?
The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?
Who advocates for this?

Fucking moronic.

You do!!! You say there should be no restrictions.
There are restrictions.

1. Citizen
2. Law abiding

.
 
There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.
Were it as simple as every Tom, Dick, and Harry simply signing-up to a so-called militia without a rigorous training program and regular maneuvers, it could hardly be called "well-regulated" now, could it?
Irrelevant. No citizen militia, no matter how well trained, can stand up against a modern military. However, we can conduct guerrilla warfare quite effectively. As long as we have our guns and the will to resist, no army could ever stop us. After all, we outnumber the army by about 300 to one.
You miss the point; 18th century state militias were a guarantee against a United States federal government becoming tyrannical. They flexed their muscle from 1861 to 1865 and lost.
You are comparing apples and oranges. The Civil War was fought between two roughly equal armies. The only reason the North won was because of their superior industrial base. I say it again. If millions of gun owners said enough is enough, no army could ever stop us.
 
Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?
No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
I didn't know that.
 
There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.
Were it as simple as every Tom, Dick, and Harry simply signing-up to a so-called militia without a rigorous training program and regular maneuvers, it could hardly be called "well-regulated" now, could it?
Irrelevant. No citizen militia, no matter how well trained, can stand up against a modern military. However, we can conduct guerrilla warfare quite effectively. As long as we have our guns and the will to resist, no army could ever stop us. After all, we outnumber the army by about 300 to one.
You miss the point; 18th century state militias were a guarantee against a United States federal government becoming tyrannical. They flexed their muscle from 1861 to 1865 and lost.
You are comparing apples and oranges. The Civil War was fought between two roughly equal armies. The only reason the North won was because of their superior industrial base. I say it again. If millions of gun owners said enough is enough, no army could ever stop us.
Sorry, the rebels lost and the USA prevailed.
 
Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?
No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
 
No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
Na, they invented firearm registration... fact
 
The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.
No, they do not. We HAVE gun control. The left wants and will continue to want more. Mostly because gun control does not actually achieve anything at all.

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.
The operative word being "control."


Shall not be infringed.

"Well regulated"

If you want to cherry pick lines .

And that was just explained to you. It does not mean more gun control and never has.
The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.


"Sensible Gun Control" is to Abolishing the 2nd Amendment what ObamaCare is to Single Payer Nationalized Health Care.

Just sayin'.

Ummm . No it's not .

Is it so bad to keep guns away from crazies and criminals?

Or should we have them available out of vending machines ?

Is it so bad to keep guns away from crazies and criminals?

There are thousands of laws on the books already to prevent crazies and criminals from getting firearms.

AND THEY DON'T WORK

Yes they do. It's the shitty gun nut states ruining everything with their lack of control .
No they do not. Not even close.

Gun control laws do not work and that is flushed out in the statistics if you actually looked at them.
 
Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
Na, they invented firearm registration... fact
You are writing falsehoods. Few citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms during the Weimar Republic before the Nazis replaced them in 1933. (Kohn, Abigail (2004). Shooters: Myths and Realities of America;s Gun Cultures. Oxford University Press. p. 187) The Nazis made gun ownership easier. (Harcourt, Bernard E. (2004)."On Gun Registration, the NRA, Adolf Hitler and Gun Laws: Exploding the Gun Culture Laws. Fordham Law Review. 73 (2): 653–680)
 
2016 Real Time Death Statistics in America
Fuck face, it's a non-issue, more people die from getting out of bed or hit by falling trees than people using an ar15 to kill people. Lol

Firearm registration is 100% unconstitutional... fact
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
Na, they invented firearm registration... fact
You are writing falsehoods. Few citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms during the Weimar Republic before the Nazis replaced them.in 1933. (Kohn, Abigail (2004). Shooters: Myths and Realities of America;s Gun Cultures. Oxford University Press. p. 187) The Nazis made gun ownership easier. (Harcourt, Bernard E. (2004)."On Gun Registration, the NRA, Adolf Hitler and Gun Laws: Exploding the Gun Culture Laws. Fordham Law Review. 73 (2): 653–680)
Bad source...
 
Don't go down that road the 2nd amendment is clear. The right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not the militia, not the government, not the army, the PEOPLE. It can not be clearer.
 
And registration always leads to confiscation.
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
Na, they invented firearm registration... fact
You are writing falsehoods. Few citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms during the Weimar Republic before the Nazis replaced them.in 1933. (Kohn, Abigail (2004). Shooters: Myths and Realities of America;s Gun Cultures. Oxford University Press. p. 187) The Nazis made gun ownership easier. (Harcourt, Bernard E. (2004)."On Gun Registration, the NRA, Adolf Hitler and Gun Laws: Exploding the Gun Culture Laws. Fordham Law Review. 73 (2): 653–680)
Bad source...
That is sources (pl) and more reliable that yours.
 
There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.

LIberals can't read. Probably becuase they love their government educations.

Reading the second, it says because well regulated militias ... it does not say if you are in a well regulated militia ... It's an explanation, not a condition. Idiots like the blowhard clayton can't read
 
There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.

LIberals can't read. Probably becuase they love their government educations.

Reading the second, it says because well regulated militias ... it does not say if you are in a well regulated militia ... It's an explanation, not a condition. Idiots like the blowhard clayton can't read

Gun control is constitutional. The state has an interests in dangerous people not being Armed . These are facts .

You screwballs would have guns out of vending machines . You seriously believe in NO gun control !?
 
The concept/idea of registering firearms came directly from Hitler himself… Fact
This is false. The Nazis relaxed the strict-control regulations of the Weimar Republic which they replaced.
Na, they invented firearm registration... fact
You are writing falsehoods. Few citizens owned, or were entitled to own firearms during the Weimar Republic before the Nazis replaced them.in 1933. (Kohn, Abigail (2004). Shooters: Myths and Realities of America;s Gun Cultures. Oxford University Press. p. 187) The Nazis made gun ownership easier. (Harcourt, Bernard E. (2004)."On Gun Registration, the NRA, Adolf Hitler and Gun Laws: Exploding the Gun Culture Laws. Fordham Law Review. 73 (2): 653–680)
Bad source...
That is sources (pl) and more reliable that yours.
Na, hitler was a socialist.
Socialists want to ban all firearms… Fact
 
Don't go down that road the 2nd amendment is clear. The right of the PEOPLE to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not the militia, not the government, not the army, the PEOPLE. It can not be clearer.

Then why include all that "militia " stuff?
 
There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.

LIberals can't read. Probably becuase they love their government educations.

Reading the second, it says because well regulated militias ... it does not say if you are in a well regulated militia ... It's an explanation, not a condition. Idiots like the blowhard clayton can't read

Gun control is constitutional. The state has an interests in dangerous people not being Armed . These are facts .

You screwballs would have guns out of vending machines . You seriously believe in NO gun control !?
There are already gun control laws on the books, they are not enforced. Mandatory firearm registration is absolutely unconstitutional… fact
 

Forum List

Back
Top