A well regulated militia.

[Rustic]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Take your "Sensible" and shove it right up your fucking ass... you know that's dog whistle for firearm registration. Dip shit

 

[boedicca]

You guys really sing a different tune when we talk voter ID .

Sophistry.

Nobody is arguing that one shouldn't have to show a legal ID to purchase a gun, just as one has to show an ID to travel on a plane, open a bank account, enter a federal building.....

 

[Rustic]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

"Sensible Gun Control" is to Abolishing the 2nd Amendment what ObamaCare is to Single Payer Nationalized Health Care.

Just sayin'.

Ummm . No it's not .

Is it so bad to keep guns away from crazies and criminals?

Or should we have them available out of vending machines ?

More Laws will only increase crazies and criminals getting more firearms you dumbass fuck… lol

 

[Timmy]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

 

[RWNJ]

You guys really sing a different tune when we talk voter ID .

Voting is not a right. It's a privilege. A privilege reserved for law abiding citizens.

 

[Eloy]

There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.

Were it as simple as every Tom, Dick, and Harry simply signing-up to a so-called militia without a rigorous training program and regular maneuvers, it could hardly be called "well-regulated" now, could it?

 

[Timmy]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

"Sensible Gun Control" is to Abolishing the 2nd Amendment what ObamaCare is to Single Payer Nationalized Health Care.

Just sayin'.

Ummm . No it's not .

Is it so bad to keep guns away from crazies and criminals?

Or should we have them available out of vending machines ?

More Laws will only increase crazies and criminals getting more firearms you dumbass fuck… lol

Ummm. No . The exact opposite is true .

 

[Yousaidwhat]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

Who advocates for this?

Fucking moronic.

 

[Timmy]

You guys really sing a different tune when we talk voter ID .

Voting is not a right. It's a privilege. A privilege reserved for law abiding citizens.

Not true again !! Try reading the rest of the constitution. There is more after the 2nd .

 

[Rustic]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

 

[Timmy]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

Who advocates for this?

Fucking moronic.

You do!!! You say there should be no restrictions.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

Who advocates for this?

Fucking moronic.

You do!!! You say there should be no restrictions.

You are an idiot if you believe this.

 

[Spare_change]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

You, obviously, are familiar with the two-steps forward, one step back, approach to liberalism, as voiced by Noah Chomsky.

Let's assume the following scenario:

1) A law is passed restricting magazine size to 10 bullets.
2) A subsequent law is passed restricting magazine size to 8 bullets - then six bullets - three bullets - one bullet.

None of these "legislative restrictions" prevent private ownership of a gun.

3) A law is passed restricting the muzzle velocity of a rifle to 3000 feet per second (fps) - this means that "elephant" guns, "assault" rifles, and other large caliber guns are illegal.

This does NOT prevent private ownership of a gun.

4) Subsequent laws restrict muzzle velocity to 2000 fps (most hunting rifles) - then, 1500 fps (virtually all long guns) - then, 750 fps (eliminates most 'high powered' pistols - and, so on.

Again, this does not prevent private ownership of a gun - only now it is single shot medium to small pistol.

5) A law is passed restricting the caliber of bullets - again the same scenario, .30 cal, .22. cal, and finally, everything above a ..177 projectile is restricted (by the way, that's a BB gun)

Now, any citizen can own a gun ... as long as it is a one shot BB gun.

Liberals will have circumvented the intent of the 2nd Amendment, without having repealed the 2nd Amendment.

THAT is what is prevented by "... shall not be infringed."

In summary - stay the fuck away from my guns.

 

[Auld Phart]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

are they?

 

[ding]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

No. The logical conclusion of your argument is banning and confiscating all guns.

 

[Rustic]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

"Sensible Gun Control" is to Abolishing the 2nd Amendment what ObamaCare is to Single Payer Nationalized Health Care.

Just sayin'.

Ummm . No it's not .

Is it so bad to keep guns away from crazies and criminals?

Or should we have them available out of vending machines ?

More Laws will only increase crazies and criminals getting more firearms you dumbass fuck… lol

Ummm. No . The exact opposite is true .

Ummm. Yes. Violent criminals will never buy firearms legally. dip shit
They either come from south of the border and/or they are stolen. Violent criminals don't buy firearms from gun shows or off the Internet. They come from gangbangers that get them from south of the border and/or they just steal them you dumbass motherfucker. LOL

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

There is nothing sensible about any type of gun control.

 

[Spare_change]

You guys really sing a different tune when we talk voter ID .

Sophistry.

Nobody is arguing that one shouldn't have to show a legal ID to purchase a gun, just as one has to show an ID to travel on a plane, open a bank account, enter a federal building.....

... but not to vote.

Interesting, huh?

 

[Timmy]

The left wants sensible gun control . Not "gun bans". Right away you cons go to extremes.

Nonsense.

You can play the word game any way you like to, but the goal of the left is to remove guns from the hands of honest citizens, as well as those not-so-honest citizens who create problems.

What you call "gun control" is nothing more than a legislated attempt to deny arms of value to all .... whether it be through banning assault weapons because they're black, decreasing magazine sizes, or limiting gun performance.

The left fully understands that you do not have to "ban guns" to disarm the American populace. The rest had better wake up to that fact, too.

What gun control would deny guns to law abiding ?

The government has no fucking right to know who buys what or how many firearms. ''Sensible/universal gun control laws" is dog whistle for firearm registration and nothing good can come out of firearm registration.

Should firearms be available out of vending machines ?

No one saying they should, but the federal government has no right to know anything about any ones legal purchases.
And any government official that thinks so should be abolished...

Gee , it's not like we have a gun problem or anything .

What does knowing who has a gun go to do with infringing rights ?

 

[RWNJ]

There are those, mostly liberals, who believe that gun ownership should be restricted to militias; as per their interpretation of the Second Amendment. I would have no problem with this. I would simply join a militia. I would encourage every patriot to do the same. This would be a good thing, in my opinion. We would no longer be individual gun owners. We would be a trained group of gun owners. Something that would, no doubt, give liberals nightmares.

Were it as simple as every Tom, Dick, and Harry simply signing-up to a so-called militia without a rigorous training program and regular maneuvers, it could hardly be called "well-regulated" now, could it?

Irrelevant. No citizen militia, no matter how well trained, can stand up against a modern military. However, we can conduct guerrilla warfare quite effectively. As long as we have our guns and the will to resist, no army could ever stop us. After all, we outnumber the army by about 300 to one.