Survivor benefits are not rights, they are entitlements foisted on us by idiots that think government has a say in marriage. End of this conversation and more proof that you are pro big government.
The point is you insist that government encode your position in law. It is my choice whether I accept the fact that my neighbor is an annoying asshole, or to kill him. The fact that that is my choice does not magically remove society's choice to accept my actions, or punish them. The difference between people who understand freedom and the moral responsibility it brings and those who think moral responsibility is imposed by society is so vast that the latter are not even aware it exists.
By the way, I never said you admit you are morally wrong. In fact, I specifically argued that I don't believe you ever will because you think you are good, and being good means you are not morally wrong, even when you are. I can judge you by whatever moral code I chose to use, and still come out on top of you, because I don't think the government should impose my moral code on you. I let society make up its rules, and then do whatever I think needs to be done. I suggest you ponder the first quote in my signature, you might actually grow up if understand it fully.
This whole post is pure bullshit, so I won't bother responding to most of it. As for your first paragraph? Huh?
All I stated was heterosexuals get certain benefits and that homosexuals couples do not. I am not sure how that translates me being for big government. I was stating a fact not an opinion.
They only get benefits if they engage in a government sanctioned relationship, what the fuck is your point again?
It's like talking to a wall.