A Democrat & a Patriot

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Merlin1047, Apr 9, 2004.

  1. Merlin1047
    Offline

    Merlin1047 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,500
    Thanks Received:
    449
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    AL
    Ratings:
    +450
    Senator Zell Miller's Comments regarding 9/11 Panel

    U.S. Senator Zell Miller Floor Statement on September 11 Commission Hearings
    Remarks as Delivered on the Senate Floor

    After watching the harsh acrimony generated by the September 11 Commission - which, let me say at the outset, is made up of good and able members - I've come to seriously question this panel's usefulness.

    I believe it will ultimately play a role in doing great harm to this
    country, for its unintended consequences, I fear, will be to energize our enemies and demoralize our troops.

    After being drowned in a tidal wave of all who didn't do enough before 9/11, I have come to believe that the Commission should issue a report that says: "No one did enough in the past. No one did near enough."

    Then thank everyone for serving, send them home and let's get on with the job of protecting this country in the future.

    Tragically, these hearings have proved to be a very divisive diversion for this country. Tragically, they have devoured valuable time, looking backwards when we should be looking forward.

    Can you imagine handling the attack on Pearl Harbor this way? Can you imagine Congress, the media and the public standing for this kind of political gamesmanship and finger pointing after that "day of infamy" in 1941?

    Some partisans tried that ploy, but they were soon quieted by the patriots who understood how important it was to get on with the war and take the battle to America's enemies, and not dwell on what FDR knew when.

    You see, back then the highest priority was to win a war, not win an election. That's what made them "The Greatest Generation."

    I realize that many well-meaning Americans see the hearings as "democracy in action." Years ago, when I was teaching political science, I probably would have had my class watching it live on television and using that very phrase with them.

    There are also the not-so-well-meaning political operatives who see these hearings as an opportunity to "score cheap points."

    Then, there are the Media Meddlers who see this as "great theater" that can be played out on the evening news and on endless talk shows for a week or more.

    Congressional hearings have long been one of Washington's most entertaining pastimes. Joe McCarthy. Watergate. Iran Contra. They all kept us glued to the TV, and made for conversation around the water coolers and arguments
    over a beer at the corner pub.

    A Congressional hearing in Washington, D.C. is the ultimate aphrodisiac for political groupies and partisan punks.

    But, it's not the groupies, punks and television-sotted American public that I'm worried about. This latter crowd can get excited and divided over just about anything. Whether it's some off-key wanna-be dreaming of being the American Idol, or what brainless bimbo The Bachelor or Average Joe will choose or who will Donald Trump fire next week.

    No, it is the real enemies of America that I'm concerned about.
    These evil killers who right now, right now are gleefully watching the shrill partisan finger-pointing of these hearings and grinning like a mule eating briars.

    They see this as a major split within the Great Satan America. They see anger, they see division, instability, bickering, peevishness and dissension.

    They see the President of the United States hammered unmercifully. They see all this and they are greatly, greatly encouraged.

    We should not be doing anything to encourage our enemies in this battle between good and evil. Yet, these hearings, in my opinion, are doing just that.

    We are playing with fire. We're playing directly into the hands of our enemy by allowing these hearings to become the great divider they have become.

    Dick Clarke's book and its release coinciding with these hearings have done this country a tremendous disservice, and someday we will reap its whirlwind.

    Long ago, Sir Walter Scott observed that revenge is "the sweetest morsel that ever was cooked in hell."

    The vindictive Clarke has now had his revenge, but what kind of hell has he, his CBS publisher and his axe-to-grind advocates unleashed?

    These hearings, coming on the heels of the election the terrorists
    influenced in Spain, bolster and energize our evil enemies as they have not been energized since 9/11.

    Chances are very good that these evil enemies of America will attempt to influence our 2004 election in a similar dramatic way as they did Spain's. And to think that could never be in this country is to stick your head in the sand.

    That is why the sooner we stop this endless bickering over the past and join together to prepare for the future, the better off this country will be. There are some things - whether this city believes it or not - that are just more important than political campaigns.

    The recent past is so ripe for political second-guessing "gotcha" and Monday morning quarter-backing. And it is so tempting in an election year. We should not allow ourselves to indulge that temptation. We should put our country first.

    Every administration from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush bears some of the blame. Dick Clarke bears a big heap of it because it was he who was in the catbird's seat to do something about it for more than a decade. Tragically, it was the decade in which we did the least.

    We did nothing after terrorists attacked the World Trade Center in 1993, killing six and injuring more than 1,000 Americans.

    We did nothing in 1996 when sixteen U.S. servicemen were killed in the bombing of the Khobar Towers.

    When our embassies were attacked in 1998, killing 263 people, our only response was to fire a few missiles on an empty tent.

    Is it any wonder? Is it any wonder that after that decade of weak-willed responses to that murderous terror, our enemies thought we would never fight back?

    In the 1990's is when Dick Clarke should have resigned. In the 1990's is when he should have apologized. That is when he should have written his book. That is, if he really had America's best interest at heart.

    Some will say, "We owe it to the families" to get more information about what happened in the past and I can understand that. But no amount of finger-pointing will bring our victims back.

    So, now we owe it to future families and all of America now in jeopardy not to encourage more terrorists, resulting in even more grieving families, perhaps many more over the ones of 9/11.

    It's obvious to me that this country is rapidly dividing itself into two camps: the wimps and the warriors.

    The ones who want to argue and assess and appease, and the ones who want to carry this fight to our enemies and kill him them before they kill us. And, in case you haven't figured it out, I proudly belong to the latter.

    This is a time like no other in the history of this country, and this
    country is being crippled with petty partisan politics of the worst possible kind. In time of war, it is not just unpatriotic; it is stupid, and it is criminal.

    So, I pray that all this time, all this energy, all this talk and all this
    attention could be focused on the future instead of the past.

    I pray we would stop pointing fingers, assigning blame and wringing our hands about what happened on that day David McCullogh has called "the worst day in our history" more than two years ago.

    And instead, pour all of our energy into how we can kill these terrorists before they kill us - again.

    For make no mistake about it. They watch these hearings. They are scheming and smiling about the distraction and the divisiveness they see in America. And while they may not know who said it years ago in America, they know instinctively that a house divided cannot stand.

    There is one other group that we should remember is listening to all of this - our troops. I was in Iraq in January and one day when I was meeting with the 1st Armored Division, a unit with a proud history known as Old Ironsides, we were discussing troop morale, and the Commanding General said it was top notch.

    And I turned to the Division's Sergeant Major, the top enlisted man in the division, a big, burly, 6-foot-3, 240 pound African American and I said, "That's good, but how do you sustain that kind of morale?"

    Without hesitation he narrowed his eyes, and he looked at me and said "The morale will stay high just as long as these troops know the people back home support us."

    Just as long as the people back home support us. What kind of message are these hearings and the outrageously political speeches on the floor of the Senate yesterday sending to those marvelous young Americans in the uniform of our country?

    I say Unite America! Before it is too late! Put aside these petty partisan differences when it comes to the protection of our people.

    Argue and argue and argue and debate and debate and debate over all the other things - jobs and education and the deficit and the environment - but please, please do not use the lives of Americans and the security of this country as a cheap-shot political talking point.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Isn't it tragic that men of honor who love this country first and their party second such as Sen. Miller, fmr Mayor Ed Koch, and Sen Lieberman are spurned by their party in favor of unprincipled self-promoters like kerry, dean, sharpton etc? Isn't it ironic that the kerry campaign does not seek out men or women of principle to serve as their spokesperson, but instead enlists a degenerate lush who should have done prison time for manslaughter?

    Shame on the Democratic party for succumbing to the machiavellian plottings of the infamous clintons who purposely sought the weakest candidates for this election in order to leave a clear field for the wicked witch of the east in the next election.

    Democrats, you could have given this country candidates with vision, intelligence and ethics. Instead you insult us all by presenting sow's ears and proclaiming them to be silk purses.

    Shame on you all.
     
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Merlin, both Zell and you said the right things. Thanks to you both.
     
  3. acludem
    Offline

    acludem VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,500
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Missouri
    Ratings:
    +69
    No one is spurning Sen. Miller, Mayor Koch or Sen. Leiberman from the Democratic Party. Of the three, Miller is my least favorite I'll admit. All three are good and honorable men who have served their constituents well. We are Democrats, we won't do to these men what the Republicans did to Jim Jeffords and simply cut them off because they may disagree with us a lot.

    Zell Miller is simply wrong on this issue. The worst thing a freedom loving nation can do is stop debating. I agree we should not politicize these issues, and I do not believe assessing our pre 9/11 performance to see what things we can do better in preventing futre attacks as divisive or political. We should be united behind our troops, but that does not entail being united behind the war they are fighting. We can support and thank and appreciate our brave men and women in uniform and still oppose the actions the government is taking.

    acludem
     
  4. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    In theory its not a bad idea to assess our pre 9/11 status to see what we could have done better. In practice it has been politicized. The timing, the attacks, the one-liners served up for media frenzy on a daily basis only go to show you that this commission, while conceived for a good purpose, has been taken over as another political weapon.

    One thing that has confused me. How can you be for the Troops but against the war. Thats like saying im for the Yankees but against them winning any games. Its a conflict of interests.
     
  5. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,537
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,152
    Trying to rewrite history already? Jeffords left of his own accord. He made a deal with Daschle to get in a committee he wanted to for his jump. He wont be reelected though. He betrayed his supporters. Doesnt care about the long run.
     
  6. acludem
    Offline

    acludem VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,500
    Thanks Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Missouri
    Ratings:
    +69
    Jeffords was run out of the Republican Party by Trent Lott. He left because Lott took away his committee chairmanship and threw him out of the Republican caucus. When he went Independent and threw control to the Democrats, Daschle gave him the committee chairmanship back as a courtesy, or for the more cynical amongst you as part of a deal to get him to leave the GOP.

    The Republicans are owned and operated by the religious right. They ran Jeffords out, they'd like to get rid of Olympia Snow, Susan Collins, and Lincoln Chaffee but can't because it would put their majority in the Senate in jeopardy.

    acludem
     

Share This Page