He's not paying for it, the insurance company is.
Left to their own devices, the insurance companies have no problem paying for family planning. Because lack of family planning actually costs them more money.
Births that are too close together have massive medical complications.
Women who are still having babies after 40 has a bunch of medical problems.
The insurance companies were probably the ones who pushed for this.
The ugly truth about ObamaCare and RomneyCare- Big Insurance got most of what it wanted.
No, the congregation is paying for it. The insurance company collects premiums. The definition of benefits page explains what the coverage pays for.
We are paying for it.
But here's the thing. The congregation isn't paying for it. Profits from the business are paying for it. Profits - and I know you are having a hard time with this- are created by the hard work of labor.
So if you were to put this up to a vote of the workers- guess what. Most of them would vote for this coverage. And if you put it up to a vote of the congregations, for that matter, most of them would vote for the coverage.
The actual cost wouldn't change. Family planning is cheaper than live births. Especially problematic live births - Too close together or after a certain age or before a certain age.
My hard work produces profits so how hard is that for someone like me that owns 3 businesses?
The church is FULLY SUPPORTED by donations from the congregation.
What business is the church in other than that?
We do not live in a mob majority rule most votes country.
We live and are governed NOT by men and their varying and changing like the wind religous beliefs or mob majority rule; we are governed BY THE LAW.