Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
45 minutes to go. SO glad it's my day off.
What are you going to do when the press conference is over? Resume pleasuring yourself with a cucumber and a jar of vaseline?
again a conservative man makes a sexual attack for no reason......
Represented by none other than Gloria Allred.
OMFG!
New accuser to go public with charges against Herman Cain - latimes.com
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
45 minutes to go. SO glad it's my day off.
Represented by none other than Gloria Allred.
OMFG!
New accuser to go public with charges against Herman Cain - latimes.com
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Good comparative post PC.
What I find interesting is the drawing back of some who call a comparison a deflection.
Not...
Represented by none other than Gloria Allred.
OMFG!
New accuser to go public with charges against Herman Cain - latimes.com
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Amazing, isn't it? And here BBoop was treated to her very own flame thread just this morning for what was a misunderstanding.45 minutes to go. SO glad it's my day off.
What are you going to do when the press conference is over? Resume pleasuring yourself with a cucumber and a jar of vaseline?
again a conservative man makes a sexual attack for no reason......
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Big difference between Clinton and Cain.
Clinton - the perverted sex-criminal he is - was caught.
Cain - nothing but bullshit allegations.
Using your logic, we could all surmise you're a child molestor is someone accused you of it, huh?
Maybe if 4 people accused me of it, and 2 of them were paid off in return for keeping quiet about it.....................then maybe you could surmise I was a child molester; I mean, it's definitely how I felt about Michael Jackson dunno about you
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Unless that unpaid intern was not a consenting participant your comment is a completely worthless non-sequitur.
But whatcha gonna do?
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Big difference between Clinton and Cain.
Clinton - the perverted sex-criminal he is - was caught.
Cain - nothing but bullshit allegations.
Using your logic, we could all surmise you're a child molestor is someone accused you of it, huh?
Maybe if 4 people accused me of it, and 2 of them were paid off in return for keeping quiet about it.....................then maybe you could surmise I was a child molester; I mean, it's definitely how I felt about Michael Jackson dunno about you
What a pantload.
The first mention of Cain committing "sexual harrassment," the Libs (racist bigots most of them) were ready to have him drawn and quartered.
Amazing, isn't it? And here BBoop was treated to her very own flame thread just this morning for what was a misunderstanding.What are you going to do when the press conference is over? Resume pleasuring yourself with a cucumber and a jar of vaseline?
again a conservative man makes a sexual attack for no reason......
This guy gets a pass from the rightwingloons.
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Unless that unpaid intern was not a consenting participant your comment is a completely worthless non-sequitur.
But whatcha gonna do?
Unpaid Subordinates were Incapable of Consenting during the Clinton Years, not on in Law, but by the Word of Liberals including Clinton's #2, algore...
Military Officers under Clinton's Command were Prosecuted for what he himself did with Monica...
And to top if all off, he used his Power to try to Destroy her after someone else Ratted them out.
Classy guy, he wasn't.
True Story.
peace...
Doesn't it occur to you that this thread will merely draw the comparison to your hero, Bill Clinton?
Four women?
A novice....
And not even one rape!
And, speaking of Bill Clinton, I always like this note:
Worst of all, in the 1990s we saw, for the first time in our history, a president a willing to accept political favors from a potentially hostile foreign power, at the same time he took extraordinary steps to make them more powerful. Even more ominously, Bill Clinton not only enabled the Peoples Republic of China to obtain our finest military technology while accepting contributions to his political campaigns; whenever professional civil servants charged with guarding our national security challenged his actions they were intimidated by their political superiors. Ledeen, Tocqueville on American Character, p. 189-190.
So if Cain gets through the miasma, you think we can look forward to this kind of treason?
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Nah, you're right...I should have compared Cain to Mother Teresa...
Or pretended, as you are doing, that this attack isn't simply the way the Left expresses fear of an opponent.
Does it occur to you that you care more about drawing up the Clinton comparison and trying to be all "right versus left" all the time than you care as to whether or not Herman Cain has actually harrassed Women, sexually?
Clinton's shit was all made public. We off that. It was the 90's.
It's time for consistency. If you were against Clinton sexually harrassing women, you're against Cain or anyone sexually harrassing women................................I mean, for most decent human beings you think about the Harrassment itself before you think about the person's fucking politics.
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Here's an instance where, in any lother case, you'd see your own hipocrisy.
You want liberals to hammer Clinton...............not deflect to "not proven," etc.......(Paula Jones), right?>
But when Cain allegations come up, you personally deflect to Clinton to say "ahah," while simultaneously ignoring what Cain did.......................in circle-jerk fashion.
We're exibiting a double standard if the first thing you do is point to the other partisan side as opposed to............I dunno....saying "really bad if true, fuck sexual harrassment!"
And for the record, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinski are two very different cases.
Lewinski didn't say that she was forced.
we can see by your posts warrior that you feel its fine to say disgusting things to women.....cain will have no problems meeting your standards
Allegations aren't Proof, and the Standard was set by your boy, Clinton.
Unless Cain was doing Worse than using an Unpaid Intern's Head as a Sperm Receptacle in between calls with Congressmen about Troop Deployments, then I don't want to hear ANY Liberals Crying about Cain.
peace...
Unless that unpaid intern was not a consenting participant your comment is a completely worthless non-sequitur.
But whatcha gonna do?
Unpaid Subordinates were Incapable of Consenting during the Clinton Years, not on in Law, but by the Word of Liberals including Clinton's #2, algore...
Military Officers under Clinton's Command were Prosecuted for what he himself did with Monica...
And to top if all off, he used his Power to try to Destroy her after someone else Ratted them out.
Classy guy, he wasn't.
True Story.
peace...
Big difference between Clinton and Cain.
Clinton - the perverted sex-criminal he is - was caught.
Cain - nothing but bullshit allegations.
Using your logic, we could all surmise you're a child molestor is someone accused you of it, huh?
Maybe if 4 people accused me of it, and 2 of them were paid off in return for keeping quiet about it.....................then maybe you could surmise I was a child molester; I mean, it's definitely how I felt about Michael Jackson dunno about you
What a pantload.
The first mention of Cain committing "sexual harrassment," the Libs (racist bigots most of them) were ready to have him drawn and quartered.