40% of Americans-earth 10K years old

[WillowTree]

so let us move to step two. If and that's a great big fffffff 40% of americans think the earth is ten thousand years old isn't that proof that we are pissing american education dollars away? And we need to ditch teachers and they fucking unions for they are not teaching our children well.

spin...spin...
Lie...lie....

Fundy conservatives brainwash children into believing that the earth is less than 10000 years old and now you blame liberals and public school teachers?

libruls teach school, if almost half the poplulation has such insane ideas such as the earth is ten thousand years old then fucking liberal teachers are to blame fire their dumb asses.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Note facts make them run away

science and religion are two peas in a pod. Both rely on theories.

Feel free to disprove the "theory" of gravity.

Gravity isn't a theory it's a law.

 

[edthecynic]

attempting to hide your ignorance is amusing.

Theory vs Law? | Ask MetaFilter

A BLOG???

Maybe you should have read it. It even had it in terms you could understand.

Pity.

OK, let's see if you can understand what came from your own link.

In general, both a scientific theory and a scientific law are accepted to be true by the scientific community as a whole. Both are used to make predictions of events. Both are used to advance technology.



In fact, some laws, such as the law of gravity, can also be theories when taken more generally. The law of gravity is expressed as a single mathematical expression and is presumed to be true all over the universe and all through time. Without such an assumption, we can do no science based on gravity's effects. But from the law, we derived the theory of gravity which describes how gravity works, what causes it, and how it behaves. We also use that to develop another theory, Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, in which gravity plays a crucial role. The basic law is intact, but the theory expands it to include various and complex situations involving space and time.



The biggest difference between a law and a theory is that a theory is much more complex and dynamic. A law describes a single action, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena. And, whereas a law is a postulate that forms the foundation of the scientific method, a theory is the end result of that same process.

 

[WillowTree]

science and religion are two peas in a pod. Both rely on theories.

Feel free to disprove the "theory" of gravity.

Gravity isn't a theory it's a law.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I take it you're with the 10k crowd..

I take it you're an idiot.

That may be true..but I still got bucks.

Going to India..next year.

Have fun in your 10K year old world.

Sold your foodstamps huh?

 

[WillowTree]

a blog???

maybe you should have read it. It even had it in terms you could understand.

Pity.

ok, let's see if you can understand what came from your own link.

in general, both a scientific theory and a scientific law are accepted to be true by the scientific community as a whole. Both are used to make predictions of events. Both are used to advance technology.



in fact, some laws, such as the law of gravity, can also be theories when taken more generally. the law of gravity is expressed as a single mathematical expression and is presumed to be true all over the universe and all through time. Without such an assumption, we can do no science based on gravity's effects. but from the law, we derived the theory of gravity which describes how gravity works, what causes it, and how it behaves. We also use that to develop another theory, einstein's general theory of relativity, in which gravity plays a crucial role. The basic law is intact, but the theory expands it to include various and complex situations involving space and time.



the biggest difference between a law and a theory is that a theory is much more complex and dynamic. a law describes a single action, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena. And, whereas a law is a postulate that forms the foundation of the scientific method, a theory is the end result of that same process.

those liberal teachers are sure fucking up teaching geology and astronomy, fire their dumb asses.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods? - ChristianAnswers.Net

Oh here it is.

Pissing on sceince is what you have to do to try and win over converts

Not pissing on anything, just providing the facts.

Do you have any 'facts' that bring the origin of the human race down to 10,000 years ago?

 

[Vanquish]

Can you cite some hard facts from reliable sources about the demographics of teachers? until then, your arguments are tepid.

 

[uscitizen]

All primitive species such as humans abandon their supersticious beliefs as they mature.

 

[NYcarbineer]

so let us move to step two. If and that's a great big fffffff 40% of americans think the earth is ten thousand years old isn't that proof that we are pissing american education dollars away? And we need to ditch teachers and they fucking unions for they are not teaching our children well.

spin...spin...
Lie...lie....

Fundy conservatives brainwash children into believing that the earth is less than 10000 years old and now you blame liberals and public school teachers?

libruls teach school, if almost half the poplulation has such insane ideas such as the earth is ten thousand years old then fucking liberal teachers are to blame fire their dumb asses.

Don't Christians teach how old the Earth is in church?

 

[Sallow]

So let us move to step two. If and that's a great big FFFFFFF 40% of Americans think the earth is ten thousand years old isn't that proof that we are pissing American Education Dollars away? And we need to ditch teachers and they fucking unions for they are not teaching our children well.

spin...spin...
lie...lie....

fundy conservatives brainwash children into believing that the earth is less than 10000 years old and now YOU blame LIBERALS and public school teachers?

I wonder what the dropout rate among these 10K theory people are...

 

[uscitizen]

Definitions of superstition (n)
su·per·sti·tion [ spər stísh'n ]
irrational belief: an irrational, but usually deep-seated belief in the magical effects of a specific action or ritual, especially in the likelihood that good or bad luck will result from performing it
irrational beliefs: irrational and often quasi-religious belief in and reverence for the magical effects of some actions and rituals or the magical powers of some objects
Synonyms: fallacy, delusion, false notion, misconception, fantasy, falsehood, falsity, irrational belief

define superstition - Bing DICTIONARY

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Human Evolution Evidence | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program

Again you're relying on a flawed dating system.

Nope you are denying for reigious purposes the exisistance of the entire groupings of sceintific endevor which have proven the bibile is wrong.

Look if you wish to have an intelligent discussion, please learn to spell correctly. It's like talking to a five year old, which is probably on par of your intellectual capability.

Fact is dumbass, science has proven the bible right.

How Archaeology Proves the Bible | Prevail Magazine

Archeology Proves Bible History Accurate ....Page 34

FoxNews.com - Israeli Archaeologist Digs Up Proof for Bible

 

[uscitizen]

Again you're relying on a flawed dating system.

Nope you are denying for reigious purposes the exisistance of the entire groupings of sceintific endevor which have proven the bibile is wrong.

Look if you wish to have an intelligent discussion, please learn to spell correctly. It's like talking to a five year old, which is probably on par of your intellectual capability.

Fact is dumbass, science has proven the bible right.

How Archaeology Proves the Bible | Prevail Magazine

Archeology Proves Bible History Accurate ....Page 34

FoxNews.com - Israeli Archaeologist Digs Up Proof for Bible

The historical aspects of the old testament especially are pretty factual.
The supersticious aspects are an entirely different matter though.

 

[Vanquish]

The funny thing is...a lot of times when you use science to prove what happened in the Bible...Christians get their panties in a wad.

There are GADS of explanations for the miracles in the desert that helped the Israelites escape Egypt...but talk intelligently about them...and some Christians go nuts.

 

[uscitizen]

The funny thing is...a lot of times when you use science to prove what happened in the Bible...Christians get their panties in a wad.

There are GADS of explanations for the miracles in the desert that helped the Israelites escape Egypt...but talk intelligently about them...and some Christians go nuts.

People tend to get upset whn you rock their supersticians.

 

[logical4u]

40% of Americans on earth are 10,000 years old?

They need to share their secret.

LOL, good one!!

You know what I meant-40% believe the earth is 10,000 years old.
Called Young Earth Creationsim. Was around in the 1800s and now the religous kooks have started it again.
Good way to have fund raisers at church now. Attendance and the plate offerings are way down.

Those that "believe", are probably referring to the Lord's years. The earth was created according to "His" timeframe, not ours (even the intellectual giants cannot fathom the intelligence it would take to make the earth, the climate, the critters, and all the 'unknowns' that we still have to find). It is okay, laugh at us that believe in the Lord. We are content.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods? - ChristianAnswers.Net

Oh here it is.

Pissing on sceince is what you have to do to try and win over converts

Not pissing on anything, just providing the facts.

Do you have any 'facts' that bring the origin of the human race down to 10,000 years ago?

No, but that burden of proof does not rest on me. I'm not the one making a claim one way or the other. I'm simply pointing out the fact that carbon dating as well as isotope dating is flawed therefore should not be considered as definitive proof.

I will say that Dr. Henry M. Morris concluded an in-depth study of the archeological evidence concerning the Bible with these words. "It must be extremely significant that, in view of the great mass of corroborative evidence regarding the Biblical history of these periods, there exists today not one unquestionable find of archaeology that proves the Bible to be in error at any point" (Henry M. Morris, The Bible and Modern Science, [Chicago:ÿMoody Press, 1956]).

No archaeological discovery has ever proven wrong a Biblical reference. On the contrary, the accuracy of the Bible has been substantiated by archaeological discoveries.

 

[uscitizen]

Not pissing on anything, just providing the facts.

Do you have any 'facts' that bring the origin of the human race down to 10,000 years ago?

No, but that burden of proof does not rest on me. I'm not the one making a claim one way or the other. I'm simply pointing out the fact that carbon dating as well as isotope dating is flawed therefore should not be considered as definitive proof.

I will say that Dr. Henry M. Morris concluded an in-depth study of the archeological evidence concerning the Bible with these words. "It must be extremely significant that, in view of the great mass of corroborative evidence regarding the Biblical history of these periods, there exists today not one unquestionable find of archaeology that proves the Bible to be in error at any point" (Henry M. Morris, The Bible and Modern Science, [Chicago:ÿMoody Press, 1956]).

No archaeological discovery has ever proven wrong a Biblical reference. On the contrary, the accuracy of the Bible has been substantiated by archaeological discoveries.

Umm there is archaeological proof that Jesus existed?

Of miracles performed?

Of god creating everything?

 

[RDD_1210]

40% of Americans on earth are 10,000 years old?

They need to share their secret.

LOL, good one!!

You know what I meant-40% believe the earth is 10,000 years old.
Called Young Earth Creationsim. Was around in the 1800s and now the religous kooks have started it again.
Good way to have fund raisers at church now. Attendance and the plate offerings are way down.

Those that "believe", are probably referring to the Lord's years. The earth was created according to "His" timeframe, not ours (even the intellectual giants cannot fathom the intelligence it would take to make the earth, the climate, the critters, and all the 'unknowns' that we still have to find). It is okay, laugh at us that believe in the Lord. We are content.

Love the irony that your screen name actually contains the word "logical" yet you somehow believe an invisible entity created everything (in 6 days no less) and you don't use logic to doubt that.