Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Conservatives tend to think in black and white terms and not very deeply about anything.you act is if it were an either/or proposition...so obviously the entire study of economics is flawed.yeah! two people weren't 100% right one time and that means all economists are really just tarot card readers making it up as they go along!
Not 100% right? Dude, they weren't even close to being right! Or have you forgotten Romer's promise that given the Stimulus that unemployment wouldn't go above 8%?
look, they aren't perfect, and some will make the wrong prediction.
but this is their area of study. they aren't just making it up, they are looking at the available data and using their knowledge to predict which candidate will be best for the economy - and more than half of them say that candidate is clinton.
they may not be right. maybe it's gary johnson. but what you cannot argue with is that the people that know the most about the economy largely believe that donald trump will not be good for it.
now does that in any way give you pause?
That also depends on their perception of HOW to create a strong economy, whether it's through government pumping all their money believing they can control its destiny... or finding ways to encourage small business to grow without having big government pumping millions of dollars to take on the roll of creating jobs.
do you believe you know something those economists don't?
Was Trump lying when he said you have better economies under the Democrats than the Republicans?
The spewing propaganda ploy.Conservatives tend to think in black and white terms and not very deeply about anything.you act is if it were an either/or proposition...so obviously the entire study of economics is flawed.Not 100% right? Dude, they weren't even close to being right! Or have you forgotten Romer's promise that given the Stimulus that unemployment wouldn't go above 8%?
look, they aren't perfect, and some will make the wrong prediction.
but this is their area of study. they aren't just making it up, they are looking at the available data and using their knowledge to predict which candidate will be best for the economy - and more than half of them say that candidate is clinton.
they may not be right. maybe it's gary johnson. but what you cannot argue with is that the people that know the most about the economy largely believe that donald trump will not be good for it.
now does that in any way give you pause?
That also depends on their perception of HOW to create a strong economy, whether it's through government pumping all their money believing they can control its destiny... or finding ways to encourage small business to grow without having big government pumping millions of dollars to take on the roll of creating jobs.
do you believe you know something those economists don't?
Daws tends to generalize...it's the trait of someone who's an idiot!
If I hear one more liberal brag about how "smart" they are I'm going to hurl! If you really ARE so gosh darned smart, Daws...how come you gave us ObamaCare which is a farce and the Obama Stimulus that failed so badly that you guys had to come up with a new economic statistic "Jobs created or saved" to hide how bad it really was?
Speaking of the Anti-Christ:What I cannot argue with is that economists with a liberal perspective don't want to see a Republican in the White House and approach any and all economic debates with their minds already made up. If you desire the status quo and think Big Government is the solution to our country's problems then you view Donald Trump as the "Anti-Christ"! Does that mean he is? No...it simply means he's not what THEY want!
Speaking of the Anti-Christ:What I cannot argue with is that economists with a liberal perspective don't want to see a Republican in the White House and approach any and all economic debates with their minds already made up. If you desire the status quo and think Big Government is the solution to our country's problems then you view Donald Trump as the "Anti-Christ"! Does that mean he is? No...it simply means he's not what THEY want!
Ah, yes...the Blinder and Watson paper! Another example of exactly what I was talking about. Two liberal professors using statistics to buttress what they would like to believe...namely that Democratic Presidents make the economy grow better than Republican Presidents.
you understand that i don't expect fair reporting from breitbart, which is why when you decided to use their economist as a source for saying good things about trump's economic plans i found it akin to asking trump if he thought his economic plan was goodDoesn't matter who i think is doing it, everyone knows Breitbart.com isn'tlol. don't kid yourself. there is a reason steve bannon is on the trump payroll and it's not because he was doing fair and unbiased reportingNo they wouldn't, you witless douche bag.
You're a moron. Who do you think is doing "fair and balanced reporting," Rachel Maddow?
There are no "fair and balanced" journalists, so why do you expect Breitbart to be "fair and balanced?" Oh yeah, you don't have an legitimate arguments to you engage in ad hominems.
It is an "either/or proposition." Government doesn't grow the economy.you act is if it were an either/or proposition...so obviously the entire study of economics is flawed.yeah! two people weren't 100% right one time and that means all economists are really just tarot card readers making it up as they go along!I'm always SO impressed by economists...take Larry Summers and Christina Romer! Two venerated Ivy League economists. One taught at Harvard...the other at Berkeley. Both considered "authorities" on economics. So what happened when they left their ivy covered academic towers and ventured out into the real world to help The Chosen One's liberal revolution? I'll tell you what happened...both of them discovered that what seemed so easy to accomplish in the classroom...didn't work at all when they were given control of the economy back in 2009. The Obama Stimulus failed to create jobs in such an EPIC fashion that both Summers and Romer jumped ship and RAN back to their tenured positions at Harvard and Berkeley! So spare me the spin, Kiddies...I'm not impressed!
Not 100% right? Dude, they weren't even close to being right! Or have you forgotten Romer's promise that given the Stimulus that unemployment wouldn't go above 8%?
look, they aren't perfect, and some will make the wrong prediction.
but this is their area of study. they aren't just making it up, they are looking at the available data and using their knowledge to predict which candidate will be best for the economy - and more than half of them say that candidate is clinton.
they may not be right. maybe it's gary johnson. but what you cannot argue with is that the people that know the most about the economy largely believe that donald trump will not be good for it.
now does that in any way give you pause?
That also depends on their perception of HOW to create a strong economy, whether it's through government pumping all their money believing they can control its destiny... or finding ways to encourage small business to grow without having big government pumping millions of dollars to take on the roll of creating jobs.
do you believe you know something those economists don't?
We all know the sources you trust don't either. So attacking my source isn't a winning argument.Doesn't matter who i think is doing it, everyone knows Breitbart.com isn'tlol. don't kid yourself. there is a reason steve bannon is on the trump payroll and it's not because he was doing fair and unbiased reportingNo they wouldn't, you witless douche bag.so the guy writes for breitbart. trump could tell us he was going to convert the u.s. to a complete barter system and pay u.s. debts in sea shells and breitbart authors would sing his praises.Hmmmm . . . so?
You're a moron. Who do you think is doing "fair and balanced reporting," Rachel Maddow?
They aren't economists. They are douche bag propagandists paid to come up with economic justifications for crony capitalism.so you believe you know better than hundreds of economists.Unless it agrees with my understanding of reality, I generally assume a claim is bullshit until proven otherwise.i see. it's propaganda because the survey results don't match what you think they should be.what part of the survey would you call propaganda?The left love their propaganda pieces.
The part where the establishment pretends that a money launderer like Hillary is better than an efficient proven businessman like Trump.
do you think maybe it could be you with the problem and not the educated, knowledgable, professional economists?
Since you and reality have never met , that explains a lot.Unless it agrees with my understanding of reality, I generally assume a claim is bullshit until proven otherwise.i see. it's propaganda because the survey results don't match what you think they should be.what part of the survey would you call propaganda?The left love their propaganda pieces.
The part where the establishment pretends that a money launderer like Hillary is better than an efficient proven businessman like Trump.
do you think maybe it could be you with the problem and not the educated, knowledgable, professional economists?
Did you imagine the wind blows all the time? Records in Germany show that the output of wind power plants in the entire country can fall to as low as 6% of their rated power. That means you need some other form of power to take up the slack for the other 94%. The output of solar falls to 0% every night.Where in the world did you get that idea? "Backing up a power plant?"One of our electric power generating plants burns coal. All the others burn natural gas. The solar generating stations don't burn any fuel.
Except they all have to be 100% backed up by fossil fuel power generation. So instead of building one power plant, you have to build two, the so-called "green energy plant" and the fossil fuel backup plant.
That's a big money saver!
con·cep·tionSince you and reality have never met , that explains a lot.Unless it agrees with my understanding of reality, I generally assume a claim is bullshit until proven otherwise.i see. it's propaganda because the survey results don't match what you think they should be.what part of the survey would you call propaganda?
The part where the establishment pretends that a money launderer like Hillary is better than an efficient proven businessman like Trump.
do you think maybe it could be you with the problem and not the educated, knowledgable, professional economists?
That must be your conception of wit.
Both parties want Big Government. The Republicans want government to protect Big Business and oppress people and lifestyles they don't like, and the Democrats want Big Government to protect consumers and establish a tax scale that places the larger burden on those who can most easily accommodate it.What I cannot argue with is that economists with a liberal perspective don't want to see a Republican in the White House and approach any and all economic debates with their minds already made up. If you desire the status quo and think Big Government is the solution to our country's problems then you view Donald Trump as the "Anti-Christ"! Does that mean he is? No...it simply means he's not what THEY want!
con·cep·tionSince you and reality have never met , that explains a lot.Unless it agrees with my understanding of reality, I generally assume a claim is bullshit until proven otherwise.i see. it's propaganda because the survey results don't match what you think they should be.The part where the establishment pretends that a money launderer like Hillary is better than an efficient proven businessman like Trump.
do you think maybe it could be you with the problem and not the educated, knowledgable, professional economists?
That must be your conception of wit.
kənˈsepSH(ə)n/
noun
con·cept
- 1.
the action of conceiving a child or of a child being conceived.
"an unfertilized egg before conception"
synonyms: inception of pregnancy, conceiving,fertilization, impregnation,insemination
"from conception until natural death"- 2.
the way in which something is perceived or regarded.
"our conception of how language relates to reality"
ˈkänˌsept/
noun
- an abstract idea; a general notion.
"structuralism is a difficult concept"
synonyms: idea, notion, conception, abstraction;More
- a plan or intention; a conception.
"the center has kept firmly to its original concept"- an idea or invention to help sell or publicize a commodity.
"a new concept in corporate hospitality."- Lol I because I'm a man can't birth babies.
- You really need to learn to read
Both parties want Big Government. The Republicans want government to protect Big Business and oppress people and lifestyles they don't like, and the Democrats want Big Government to protect consumers and establish a tax scale that places the larger burden on those who can most easily accommodate it.What I cannot argue with is that economists with a liberal perspective don't want to see a Republican in the White House and approach any and all economic debates with their minds already made up. If you desire the status quo and think Big Government is the solution to our country's problems then you view Donald Trump as the "Anti-Christ"! Does that mean he is? No...it simply means he's not what THEY want!
You calling anybody a douche bag is hilarious.con·cep·tionSince you and reality have never met , that explains a lot.Unless it agrees with my understanding of reality, I generally assume a claim is bullshit until proven otherwise.i see. it's propaganda because the survey results don't match what you think they should be.
do you think maybe it could be you with the problem and not the educated, knowledgable, professional economists?
That must be your conception of wit.
kənˈsepSH(ə)n/
noun
con·cept
- 1.
the action of conceiving a child or of a child being conceived.
"an unfertilized egg before conception"
synonyms: inception of pregnancy, conceiving,fertilization, impregnation,insemination
"from conception until natural death"- 2.
the way in which something is perceived or regarded.
"our conception of how language relates to reality"
ˈkänˌsept/
noun
- an abstract idea; a general notion.
"structuralism is a difficult concept"
synonyms: idea, notion, conception, abstraction;More
- a plan or intention; a conception.
"the center has kept firmly to its original concept"- an idea or invention to help sell or publicize a commodity.
"a new concept in corporate hospitality."- Lol I because I'm a man can't birth babies.
- You really need to learn to read
So what's your complaint, douche bag?
But still big enough to keep gays from marrying, women from getting abortions and the "wrong" people from voting? Still big enough to force an agenda on everyone?Establishment Republicans may want it, but that's why they were shown the door in this election. Rank and file Republicans don't want big government. They want government cut down to size.
The primaries are not the general election.Both parties want Big Government. The Republicans want government to protect Big Business and oppress people and lifestyles they don't like, and the Democrats want Big Government to protect consumers and establish a tax scale that places the larger burden on those who can most easily accommodate it.What I cannot argue with is that economists with a liberal perspective don't want to see a Republican in the White House and approach any and all economic debates with their minds already made up. If you desire the status quo and think Big Government is the solution to our country's problems then you view Donald Trump as the "Anti-Christ"! Does that mean he is? No...it simply means he's not what THEY want!
Establishment Republicans may want it, but that's why they were shown the door in this election. Rank and file Republicans don't want big government. They want government cut down to size.
