Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At her behest?
Buh-bye.
changing the subject to avoid having to post proof of claims made is also a pussy poster problem and irrelevant to the conversation.
With the Clintons, it always takes a few years to get the truth fully out....
Whitewater took forever, with all sorts of lies, hate, and murder by the Clintons to shut it down. In the end, 12 of 14 Whitewater partners went to prison. Guess who the 2 who didn't were???
That's what undergraduate studies are supposed to do. They expose you to ideas that you might not ever have had on your own, on all sorts of subjects you might not have thought you were interested in.Let me put it this way...I was far more liberal after four years at UMass then I was when I started. What ended up making me a conservative was the real world. Once you're out in it for awhile you come to realize that college professor who sounded like they were such an authority...had little or no real world experience and was speaking about "theory". "Theory" is what Larry Summers and Christina Romer brought to the White House and the failure of "theory" is what had them both packing their bags and running back to their college jobs.
How you feel about things, all things, is based on your own life experience. That doesn't mean that you were too sheltered as a youth nor that those who taught you had an agenda. It means you can't be taught everything in a classroom that you need to know to function effectively in real life.
You came to your own conclusions based on fundamentals you learned in school regardless of any spin you think was used. Great. The system works.
Frankly, anyone who is as influenced by a teacher or a group of teachers as you seem to think most economists are isn't being brainwashed. It sounds more like a student crush. I don't think that is representative of the people who call themselves economists. They do what you and I and everyone I know did - learn what we could in school the easy way and learn what's really important afterwards, the hard way.
changing the subject to avoid having to post proof of claims made is also a pussy poster problem and irrelevant to the conversation.
With the Clintons, it always takes a few years to get the truth fully out....
Whitewater took forever, with all sorts of lies, hate, and murder by the Clintons to shut it down. In the end, 12 of 14 Whitewater partners went to prison. Guess who the 2 who didn't were???
idiota, white water cost us 70 million dollars and got you nothing except for a blue dress. THAT is what you loons do. investigate them repeatedly and get nothing. but the investigations are used by you loons to run their numbers down.
No. Your experiences molded your views. Even if we led the same lives we would have filtered them differently and taken different "truths" from them.That's what undergraduate studies are supposed to do. They expose you to ideas that you might not ever have had on your own, on all sorts of subjects you might not have thought you were interested in.Let me put it this way...I was far more liberal after four years at UMass then I was when I started. What ended up making me a conservative was the real world. Once you're out in it for awhile you come to realize that college professor who sounded like they were such an authority...had little or no real world experience and was speaking about "theory". "Theory" is what Larry Summers and Christina Romer brought to the White House and the failure of "theory" is what had them both packing their bags and running back to their college jobs.
How you feel about things, all things, is based on your own life experience. That doesn't mean that you were too sheltered as a youth nor that those who taught you had an agenda. It means you can't be taught everything in a classroom that you need to know to function effectively in real life.
You came to your own conclusions based on fundamentals you learned in school regardless of any spin you think was used. Great. The system works.
Frankly, anyone who is as influenced by a teacher or a group of teachers as you seem to think most economists are isn't being brainwashed. It sounds more like a student crush. I don't think that is representative of the people who call themselves economists. They do what you and I and everyone I know did - learn what we could in school the easy way and learn what's really important afterwards, the hard way.
So how is getting only one side of a political argument "exposing" students to ideas? It's not! It's programming them to believe what they are being told.
So my learning in the real world that most of my college professors didn't have a clue what they were talking about means that the "system works"? That's an amusing concept. I had to UNLEARN what I spent a lot of money learning in the first place! The system would "work" if I was given an unbiased look at different arguments and allowed to make a decision about what seemed to be the best theory! That isn't what's taking place on college campuses these days.
changing the subject to avoid having to post proof of claims made is also a pussy poster problem and irrelevant to the conversation.
With the Clintons, it always takes a few years to get the truth fully out....
Whitewater took forever, with all sorts of lies, hate, and murder by the Clintons to shut it down. In the end, 12 of 14 Whitewater partners went to prison. Guess who the 2 who didn't were???
idiota, white water cost us 70 million dollars and got you nothing except for a blue dress. THAT is what you loons do. investigate them repeatedly and get nothing. but the investigations are used by you loons to run their numbers down.
The Clinton's long history of stonewalling investigations for years is what drives up the cost of investigations! The evidence Congressional investigators were looking for in the Whitewater case went missing from the Rose law firm only to mysteriously reappear in Hillary Clinton's White House office years later! Think that was done by "loons" trying to run the Clinton's down or by the Clinton's doing what they do best...lying and covering up?
Washington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
Washington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
"Facts" refutedWashington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
Refute the facts they stated or get lost.
Let's face it, the corruption is scandalous and well... everyone knows the consequences. The only thing left unresolved is why would anyone want this person to be the president for the next 4 years.
"Facts" refutedWashington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
Refute the facts they stated or get lost.
Let's face it, the corruption is scandalous and well... everyone knows the consequences. The only thing left unresolved is why would anyone want this person to be the president for the next 4 years.
The political leanings of The Washington Timesare often described as conservative. TheWashington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."
Political alignment: Centre-right; Conservative
Owner(s): Operations Holdings (via The Washington Times, LLC)
News editor: Victor Morton
Publisher: Larry Beasley
The source is not valid subsequently neither are the "facts" reported in it."Facts" refutedWashington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
Refute the facts they stated or get lost.
Let's face it, the corruption is scandalous and well... everyone knows the consequences. The only thing left unresolved is why would anyone want this person to be the president for the next 4 years.
The political leanings of The Washington Timesare often described as conservative. TheWashington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."
Political alignment: Centre-right; Conservative
Owner(s): Operations Holdings (via The Washington Times, LLC)
News editor: Victor Morton
Publisher: Larry Beasley
How does this refute anything that was said in the article?
Ad hominems do not constitute a valid refutation.
The source is not valid subsequently neither are the "facts" reported in it."Facts" refutedWashington Times!CNBC finds Clintons guilty of doctoring the housing bubble, and as you might have guessed, massive corruption. The clintons provided the fuel for the banks while the banks provided them as much donations as they would ever need. All the classic Clinton lies and corruption are visible for all once more in this case.
Kudlow: Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
A Washington Times investigative report concluded that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae's political action committee and individuals linked to the companies donated $75,500 to Mrs. Clinton's senatorial campaign. And on top of that, the embattled Clinton Foundation received a $50,000 contribution from Freddie Mac, according to the Times.
Next, the Clinton administration's rules ordered the taxpayer-backed Fannie and Freddie to expand their quotas of risky loans from 30 percent of portfolio to 50 percent as part of a big push to expand home ownership.
Meanwhile, Hillary's attempt to blame Donald Trump is utterly absurd. Buying low and selling high is not against the law. In fact, Mr. Trump's investment acumen may serve America well in the not too distant future.
Hillary Clinton is the poison of any economy. Corruption and lies are associated with poor economy, no matter where they are implemented.
Refute the facts they stated or get lost.
Let's face it, the corruption is scandalous and well... everyone knows the consequences. The only thing left unresolved is why would anyone want this person to be the president for the next 4 years.
The political leanings of The Washington Timesare often described as conservative. TheWashington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."
Political alignment: Centre-right; Conservative
Owner(s): Operations Holdings (via The Washington Times, LLC)
News editor: Victor Morton
Publisher: Larry Beasley
How does this refute anything that was said in the article?
Ad hominems do not constitute a valid refutation.
What ad hominem?
There are none , but if you insist, stfu you half wit pile of shit.
How's that? Are you happy now?
Wrong a both assumptions.The source is not valid subsequently neither are the "facts" reported in it."Facts" refutedWashington Times!
Refute the facts they stated or get lost.
Let's face it, the corruption is scandalous and well... everyone knows the consequences. The only thing left unresolved is why would anyone want this person to be the president for the next 4 years.
The political leanings of The Washington Timesare often described as conservative. TheWashington Post reported: "the Times was established by Moon to combat communism and be a conservative alternative to what he perceived as the liberal bias of The Washington Post."
Political alignment: Centre-right; Conservative
Owner(s): Operations Holdings (via The Washington Times, LLC)
News editor: Victor Morton
Publisher: Larry Beasley
How does this refute anything that was said in the article?
Ad hominems do not constitute a valid refutation.
What ad hominem?
There are none , but if you insist, stfu you half wit pile of shit.
How's that? Are you happy now?
That is not valid reasoning right there. But it's not surprising to meet a hard left regresive who can't reason to save his life. There indeed was ad hominem as you try to refute the facts by attacking the people who wrote them.
Thankfully Wikipedia confirmed all that was said so... I guess you are out of ammo.
The Washington Times (AKA The Moonie Times) is Washington, D.C.'s newspaper which perpetually plays second fiddle to the Washington Post. The Times has lost money ever since its inception in 1982 until 2015, in which it finally became profitable.[1]
Started by Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, the Church has pumped over $1.7 billion into the paper to keep it afloat.[2]Although much of the early Times staff came from the defunct Washington Star, the paper's board of directors was made up of members of the Unification Church, with the staff undergoes occasional purges, resignations, and faction fights over the direction of the paper.[3] No less an authority than the Rev. Moon himself has proclaimed the Times a "gift" to America to thank the U.S. for fighting Communism inKorea, or something like that.[4] In 2002 Rev. Moon outdid himself by proclaiming he established the Times "in response to heaven's direction" and that "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world."[5]
The editorial slant of the Washington Times is notably conservative and partisan in favor of the Republican Party. On occasion, they do some bang-up investigative journalism and muckraking, sometimes on other conservative groups which the Moonies are involved in intramural feuds with. Usually though, theTimes is a quaint bore, ever pining for a return to the glory days of the 1850s or 1920s, andRonald Reagan's befuddled dreams ofreactionary radicalism.
The paper promotes all sorts of wingnutidiocies curiosities, including variouspseudosciences (creationism, anti-environmentalism, global warming denial, false claims about abortion and abstinence-only sex education) and bigotry (homophobia,transphobia, Islamophobia, anti-secularism)
Btw the previous is from rational wiki.
The Washington Times (AKA The Moonie Times) is Washington, D.C.'s newspaper which perpetually plays second fiddle to the Washington Post. The Times has lost money ever since its inception in 1982 until 2015, in which it finally became profitable.[1]
Started by Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, the Church has pumped over $1.7 billion into the paper to keep it afloat.[2]Although much of the early Times staff came from the defunct Washington Star, the paper's board of directors was made up of members of the Unification Church, with the staff undergoes occasional purges, resignations, and faction fights over the direction of the paper.[3] No less an authority than the Rev. Moon himself has proclaimed the Times a "gift" to America to thank the U.S. for fighting Communism inKorea, or something like that.[4] In 2002 Rev. Moon outdid himself by proclaiming he established the Times "in response to heaven's direction" and that "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world."[5]
The editorial slant of the Washington Times is notably conservative and partisan in favor of the Republican Party. On occasion, they do some bang-up investigative journalism and muckraking, sometimes on other conservative groups which the Moonies are involved in intramural feuds with. Usually though, theTimes is a quaint bore, ever pining for a return to the glory days of the 1850s or 1920s, andRonald Reagan's befuddled dreams ofreactionary radicalism.
The paper promotes all sorts of wingnutidiocies curiosities, including variouspseudosciences (creationism, anti-environmentalism, global warming denial, false claims about abortion and abstinence-only sex education) and bigotry (homophobia,transphobia, Islamophobia, anti-secularism)
Btw the previous is from rational wiki.
Yes we know that you don't understand how to reason, now go read a book about how to do so properly, moron!
I hereby by the use of your own logic proclaim that your text is false, because you are a regressive retard.
The Washington Times (AKA The Moonie Times) is Washington, D.C.'s newspaper which perpetually plays second fiddle to the Washington Post. The Times has lost money ever since its inception in 1982 until 2015, in which it finally became profitable.[1]
Started by Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, the Church has pumped over $1.7 billion into the paper to keep it afloat.[2]Although much of the early Times staff came from the defunct Washington Star, the paper's board of directors was made up of members of the Unification Church, with the staff undergoes occasional purges, resignations, and faction fights over the direction of the paper.[3] No less an authority than the Rev. Moon himself has proclaimed the Times a "gift" to America to thank the U.S. for fighting Communism inKorea, or something like that.[4] In 2002 Rev. Moon outdid himself by proclaiming he established the Times "in response to heaven's direction" and that "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world."[5]
The editorial slant of the Washington Times is notably conservative and partisan in favor of the Republican Party. On occasion, they do some bang-up investigative journalism and muckraking, sometimes on other conservative groups which the Moonies are involved in intramural feuds with. Usually though, theTimes is a quaint bore, ever pining for a return to the glory days of the 1850s or 1920s, andRonald Reagan's befuddled dreams ofreactionary radicalism.
The paper promotes all sorts of wingnutidiocies curiosities, including variouspseudosciences (creationism, anti-environmentalism, global warming denial, false claims about abortion and abstinence-only sex education) and bigotry (homophobia,transphobia, Islamophobia, anti-secularism)
Btw the previous is from rational wiki.
Yes we know that you don't understand how to reason, now go read a book about how to do so properly, moron!
I hereby by the use of your own logic proclaim that your text is false, because you are a regressive retard.
Let's recap you've just made a false proclamation based on a false assumption.
Then in desperation toss out the we fallacy which is either Nosism, from the Latin nos, "we", is the practice of using the pronoun "we" to refer to oneself when expressing a personal opinion.
Or the argumentum ad populum fallicy or both.
The Washington Times (AKA The Moonie Times) is Washington, D.C.'s newspaper which perpetually plays second fiddle to the Washington Post. The Times has lost money ever since its inception in 1982 until 2015, in which it finally became profitable.[1]
Started by Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon, the Church has pumped over $1.7 billion into the paper to keep it afloat.[2]Although much of the early Times staff came from the defunct Washington Star, the paper's board of directors was made up of members of the Unification Church, with the staff undergoes occasional purges, resignations, and faction fights over the direction of the paper.[3] No less an authority than the Rev. Moon himself has proclaimed the Times a "gift" to America to thank the U.S. for fighting Communism inKorea, or something like that.[4] In 2002 Rev. Moon outdid himself by proclaiming he established the Times "in response to heaven's direction" and that "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world."[5]
The editorial slant of the Washington Times is notably conservative and partisan in favor of the Republican Party. On occasion, they do some bang-up investigative journalism and muckraking, sometimes on other conservative groups which the Moonies are involved in intramural feuds with. Usually though, theTimes is a quaint bore, ever pining for a return to the glory days of the 1850s or 1920s, andRonald Reagan's befuddled dreams ofreactionary radicalism.
The paper promotes all sorts of wingnutidiocies curiosities, including variouspseudosciences (creationism, anti-environmentalism, global warming denial, false claims about abortion and abstinence-only sex education) and bigotry (homophobia,transphobia, Islamophobia, anti-secularism)
Btw the previous is from rational wiki.
Yes we know that you don't understand how to reason, now go read a book about how to do so properly, moron!
I hereby by the use of your own logic proclaim that your text is false, because you are a regressive retard.
Let's recap you've just made a false proclamation based on a false assumption.
Then in desperation toss out the we fallacy which is either Nosism, from the Latin nos, "we", is the practice of using the pronoun "we" to refer to oneself when expressing a personal opinion.
Or the argumentum ad populum fallicy or both.
Before embarrassing yourself anymore, go read that book. You can make it.
