No. Russians lived there for centuries. And new, post-Maidan regime started to kill them.Wow, really? So how did NATO trick Putin into sending Russian into Ukraine to get killed? Did they lure them with Vodka and porn?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Russians lived there for centuries. And new, post-Maidan regime started to kill them.Wow, really? So how did NATO trick Putin into sending Russian into Ukraine to get killed? Did they lure them with Vodka and porn?
No. Russians lived there for centuries. And new, post-Maidan regime started to kill them.
But Northern states who took up Arms against southern secessionists won the war.Meh, not really. More like they took up arms after their preferred candidate got the boot.
Just like any blue states that took up Arms against Trump would be in trouble. I don't like Trump, but that would be going too far.
It is hilarious watching someone be so ignorant.Meh, not really. More like they took up arms after their preferred candidate got the boot.
Do by your own map, Ethnic Russians only make up a majority in Crimea.It is hilarious watching someone be so ignorant.
But Russian-speaking people and political Vatniks are majority in the whole South -East. (Actually , Russians see Ukrainians as Russians, either). Watch the map of votes during the last more or less free elections on 2010.Do by your own map, Ethnic Russians only make up a majority in Crimea.
But Russian-speaking people and political Vatniks are majority in the whole South -East. (Actually , Russians see Ukrainians as Russians, either). Watch the map of votes during the last more or less free elections on 2010.
What is even more important, nobody have right to kill Russians even if they are minority.
No, they aren't. Even in the Donbass, Ethnic Russians were only 30% of the population.
It depends on who are questioning them. And no, "Russian-speaking Ukrainians" are no different from Russians, and difference without difference isn't difference. But what is actually important, its not ethnic clash "Ukrainians vs Russians". No. Its political conflict - "Banderlogs vs Vatniks". I mean Black Americans are racial minority, but people beliving in equal rights for Black and White Americans are political majority. And American Civil war wasn't a war between Black people and White people. Same way, conflict in Ukraine isn't conflict between Russians and Ukrainians. It was a conflict between pro-European Banderlogs and pro-Russia Vatnics.
They have had billions in arms and thousands of mercenaries, are you on drugs?Give Ukraine the resources they need to fight the aggressors.
You think they can’t outlast Russia if given the resources?
Look at Vietnam.
Russia does have free elections i know that doesn't fit with your nonsense but there it is, did the Swedes and Finland have a referendum on being in NATO?These Countries joined NATO because Russia can't be trusted under Putin's leadership.
Sweden and Finland want to join NATO now. Countries that prided themselves on their neutrality during the Cold War are now wanting to join NATO because they can't trust Russia.
Here's a crazy idea. Russia should allow free elections and try to be a good member of the international community. Then people won't care that much about NATO.
Proof you are a Russian Troll.Russia does have free elections i know that doesn't fit with your nonsense but there it is, did the Swedes and Finland have a referendum on being in NATO?
You think that makes them stronger than we were in Vietnam?They have had billions in arms and thousands of mercenaries, are you on drugs?
What?Kursk is even in Ukraine you moron

You lost in Vietnam and you will lose in Ukraine, those Ukrainians who went into Kursk are just about encircled in a Cauldron some have taken part in war crimes murdering civilians in the areas they occupied so expect some trials when the investigations finish.You think that makes them stronger than we were in Vietnam?