A reasonable debate about this war could certainly be had. There are reasonable arguments for and against it. Just another example of why it's critical for decision-makers to have complete, comprehensive and objective facts and information from both sides of the argument.
What I question are (a) Trump's motives and stability, and the neverending flipflips and about-faces that have made him the least trustworthy and least credible person (and America the least trustworthy country) on the planet, and (b) the mindless, obedient Trumpsters who think their attempts to spin for him aren't both obvious and comical.
MAGA clearly has absolutely zero (0) understanding of the critical value of trust, stability and credibility in geopolitics, among other things (like domestic macroeconomics and foreign trade).
I've seen a few show some backbone and some balls. But not many, that's for sure. It's just more spin, pivot, attack. Don't these people have any self respect whatsoever?