Your Thoughts On Aipac, Please :)

[docmauser1]

Today's zionist AIPAC lobby is no different than the German-American Bund of the 1930's. Both organizations openly support their former homeland's racial fascism and apartheid agenda.

Arab-american "bund" drivel.

 

[dilloduck]

Every country should have a shot at purchasing an American lawmaker. It's only fair.

 

[docmauser1]

And you wonder why Germany wanted the Jews out, they were trying to take control of Germany just like here. They made our congress as corrupt as they are using their God (money)

Halal drivel.

 

[docmauser1]

AIPAC Spy Figure Zionist Wanted Me Dead

Maybe circumcised?

 

[Penelope]

Followed by Rocco redefining words, concepts and generally working hard to mislead. Basically: Lies
You deceitful son-of-a -bitch! Rocco!
You can find all the legal text you fucking well like, but to try to pretend that AIPAC is not an agency of Israel is just the biggest fucking lie made here for weeks! And with your contributions, that is SAYING SOMETHING!
As to being "Un-American" - If being American is being cheated on, deceived by and manipulated by foreign powers, no it is not un-American.
But DO try to get your head out of your arse, dear Rocco.

Drivel.

Drivel is what people with empty minds say, one word answers!

 

[docmauser1]

Every country should have a shot at purchasing an American lawmaker. It's only fair.

So, what's the problem?

 

[dilloduck]

Every country should have a shot at purchasing an American lawmaker. It's only fair.

So, what's the problem?

Did I say there was a problem ? If other countries want the influence that Israel has they need to get in there and pay for it. It's only fair.

 

[MJB12741]

Aipac is so hated by those Islamic terrorists & their supporters who condemn the USA thus making Aipac so vital to our security in limiting their numbers & desire to want to live here. Want proof? Just read the comments on this thread by those who oppose Aipac. LONG LIVE AIPAC!

 

[docmauser1]

Drivel is what people with empty minds say, one word answers!

One-word answers is what their profuse drivel deserves, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

Did I say there was a problem ? If other countries want the influence that Israel has they need to get in there and pay for it. It's only fair.

Like the saudi lobby?

 

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

This is the old "three-card Monty" trick. First talk about AIPAC --- then switch to AZC.

AIPAC's founder was, in fact an agent of Israel. AIPAC was a spinoff of the American Zionist Council (AZC) which John and Bobby Kennedy forced to register as a Foreign Agent. AIPAC is a de facto Foreign Agent, but has political power to prevent the Government from forcing them to register and there aren't any leaders with balls like John or Bobby Kennedy who would stand up to the Zionists.

To wit:

"Referencing over 1,000 previously classified documents released under a Freedom of Information Act filing, Smith follows Isaiah L. Kenen's path from registered foreign agent for the Israeli government to founder of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee or AIPAC. Smith unearths a formerly secret non-prosecution agreement, the "subvention caveat" reached between the Israel lobby and the US Department of Justice. The agreement reveals a great deal about the latitude of the lobby's operations and the US government's institutional aversion to challenging it. "

America s Defense Line The Justice Department s Battle to Register the Israel Lobby as Agents of a Foreign Government Grant F. Smith Philip Weiss 9780976443728 Amazon.com Books

"This 100,000-strong group has been described as an agent of the Israeli government, and those accusations were substantiated in 2005 when a pentagon analyst plead guilty to passing military secrets to two AIPAC employees en route to Israel. After some political wrangling, all charges were dropped against the two Jewish AIPAC employees in 2009, even though the analyst agreed to testify against the AIPAC employees, and the government had overwhelming evidence to prosecute. It was reported by Time magazine that Jane Harman, a Jewish congresswoman, was bribed by AIPAC to lobby the Department of Justice to drop the spying charges against the AIPAC employees. In 2009, CQ politics reported that Harman was caught on a NSA wiretap telling an Israeli agent that she would lobby the Department of Justice to drop the case."

AIPAC MUST REGISTER AS FOREIGN AGENT - The Petition Site

"A Defense Department analyst pleaded guilty yesterday to passing government secrets to two employees of a pro-Israel lobbying group and revealed for the first time that he also gave classified information directly to an Israeli government official in Washington.

Lawrence A. Franklin told a judge in U.S. District Court in Alexandria that he met at least eight times with Naor Gilon, who was the political officer at the Israeli Embassy before being recalled last summer.....Weissman, 53, of Bethesda, faces one count of conspiracy to illegally communicate national defense information. His attorneys did not return calls late last night. American Israel Public Affairs Committee officials declined comment."

Defense Analyst Guilty in Israeli Espionage Case


"It looks like a jail sentence might not have been all that Larry Franklin, the former Pentagon official convicted of spying for Israel, had to fear in recent years.

Court documents filed last week suggest a Sopranos-like effort to get rid of Franklin, who had agreed to testify against two former AIPAC activists, CQ's Jeff Stein reports."

AIPAC Spy Figure Zionist Wanted Me Dead

(COMMENT)

AIPAC and AZC are two different organization. AZC disbanded.

While you copied a lot of information from the Institute for Research: Middle East Policy Website, you forgot to mention that "Since the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's incorporation in 1963 it has been periodically investigated by the FBI and US Department of Justice. The following archive presents a chronology of publicly released documents with links to other sections of the Israel Lobby Archive, shedding light on the origins and activities of AIPAC." You will note that COL Franklin has never served any prison time for the offense for which he was convicted and the DOJ has never actually taken either Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman to court for trial in the nearly a decade since the alleged offense occurred.

In nearly a quarter century no lobby has been subject to periodic re-investigation more than AIPAC. It comes up clean (no violations) every time.

Investigations into the RNC

Booker burying Lonegan in super PAC cash dash
By Dave Levinthal
October 7, 2013

Supreme Court 'McCutcheon' case could aid GOP
By Michael Beckel
October 7, 2013

Judicial candidates vulnerable to outside spending
By Amy Myers
August 21, 2012

Stealth PACs revealed
By The Center for Public Integrity
February 9, 2000​

Investigations into the DNC

Supreme Court 'McCutcheon' case could aid GOP
By Michael Beckel
October 7, 2013

Silent Partners: Special Report
By Derek Willis andAron Pilhofer
September 25, 2003

Soft money primer
By John Dunbar
September 26, 2002

Buying influence
By The Center for Public Integrity
July 16, 2003​

Investigations are not the sole criteria for the integrity of a Political Action Committee (PAC). If it were so, both the RNC and the DNC would be out of business. Political parties, when in power, often target the opposition to reduce their influence. AIPAC is not exception. It is influential and it has many domestic opponents that would like to see it fade away. That is the nature of American Politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

Penelope, et al,

It is evidence that there is an ongoing debate in America concerning the American-Israeli relationship. In some ways it is healthy.

U.S. Republican Senator Ted Cruz said he walked out of a speech to a Christian organization Wednesday night after some audience members booed his comments in support of Israel and the Jewish people.

Is this hard evidence enough for you?

(COMMENT)

But it is not hard evidence in connection to the allegation that AIPAC is a foreign agency.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Penelope]

Penelope, et al,

It is evidence that there is an ongoing debate in America concerning the American-Israeli relationship. In some ways it is healthy.

U.S. Republican Senator Ted Cruz said he walked out of a speech to a Christian organization Wednesday night after some audience members booed his comments in support of Israel and the Jewish people.

Is this hard evidence enough for you?

(COMMENT)

But it is not hard evidence in connection to the allegation that AIPAC is a foreign agency.

Most Respectfully,
R

Its so obvious I don't need written evidence. You can tell the Zionist in the congress, the one who sell out for money and make an oath to Israel. One needs to be blind not to see it.

 

[MJB12741]

AIPAC in --Sharia law out! LONG LIVE AIPAC!

 

[Penelope]

Aipac is so hated by those Islamic terrorists & their supporters who condemn the USA thus making Aipac so vital to our security in limiting their numbers & desire to want to live here. Want proof? Just read the comments on this thread by those who oppose Aipac. LONG LIVE AIPAC!

Well none of us here are Islamic terrorists and we don't want AIPAC in our gov. spying on us. AIPAC die. Saying AIPAC is vital to our security , go move to Israel and then watch how they come and beg us for more bombs. We don't need to depend on anyone else for security, you guys did a great job of airport security on 911 and even in the towers leading up to 911 didn't you , if that is your kind of security?? .If anything its the other way around, we need to protect ourselves from Israel.

 

[RoccoR]

Penelope, et al,

It is rare in politics that proponents (of Israel in this case) do not have opponents (against Israel in this case).

Penelope, et al,

It is evidence that there is an ongoing debate in America concerning the American-Israeli relationship. In some ways it is healthy.

U.S. Republican Senator Ted Cruz said he walked out of a speech to a Christian organization Wednesday night after some audience members booed his comments in support of Israel and the Jewish people.

Is this hard evidence enough for you?

(COMMENT)

But it is not hard evidence in connection to the allegation that AIPAC is a foreign agency.

Most Respectfully,
R

Its so obvious I don't need written evidence. You can tell the Zionist in the congress, the one who sell out for money and make an oath to Israel. One needs to be blind not to see it.

(OBSERVATION)

In the recent letter to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights criticizing its bias towards Israel, there were 106 signatures. In contrast, there are at least 138 Congressmen which voted against Israel at-least once, the following 60 have voted against the Jewish State the most; between 2 and 5 times on the above mentioned issues.

District​	Politician​	Party​	State​	# of times voted against Israel​	2010 Opponent​
15​	John D. Dingell​	D​	michigan​	5​	Robert Steele​
9​	Barbara Lee​	D​	california​	4​	Jerry Hashimoto​
23​	Lois Capps​	D​	california​	4​	Tom Watson​
7​	George Miller​	D​	california​	4​	Rick Tubbs​
7​	André Carson​	D​	indiana​	4​	Marvin Scott​
4​	Donna F. Edwards​	D​	maryland​	4​	Robert Broadus​
14​	John Conyers Jr.​	D​	michigan​	4​	Don Ukrainec​
4​	Peter A. DeFazio​	D​	oregon​	4​	Art Robinson​
3​	Nick J. Rahall II​	D​	west virginia​	4​	Elliot Maynard​
7​	Raúl M. Grijalva​	D​	arizona​	3​	Ruth McClung​
13​	Fortney Pete Stark​	D​	california​	3​	forest baker​
17​	Sam Farr​	D​	california​	3​	Jeff Taylor​
6​	Lynn C. Woolsey​	D​	california​	3​	Jim Judd​
51​	Bob Filner​	D​	california​	3​	Nick Popaditch​
1​	John W. Olver​	D​	mass​	3​	Bill Gunn​
8​	Michael E. Capuano​	D​	mass​	3​	George Burton​
10​	Bill Delahunt​	D​	mass​	3​	Jeff Perry​

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

(COMMENT)

Yes, it is quite obvious who is for supporting Israel and who is against. But I'm not sure that the Members of Congress in support of Israel are rightly called "Zionists" (a nationalist movement of Jews and Jewish culture that supports the creation of a Jewish homeland in the territory defined as the Land of Israel). The Zionist Movement (which is a nationalist movement) was understood and accepted by both the Arab and the Jews to a point in time --- as least as early as 1919 in the Agreement between HRH the Emir Faisal and Chairman Weizmann. They said in part: "mindful of the racial kindship and ancient bonds existing between the Arabs and the Jewish people, and realising that the surest means of working out the consummation of their national aspirations, is through the closest possible, collaboration in the development of the Arab State and Palestine."

Members of Congress are not supporting Jewish National Aspirations, their is already a Jewish State (Israel); just as agreed upon by the Emir and Chairman. What the Congress is supporting is the protection and preservation of the established state against Arab aggression, and Israels right to self defense.

Oh BTW, even The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (Navi Pillay) agrees in her letter to Congress that Israel does indeed have the right of self defense against indiscriminate fire from HAMAS.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Penelope]

Those are probably new ones or are ones just taking up space in congress. Unless you make a vow to Israel you have no voice.

 

[Penelope]

AIPAC in --Sharia law out! LONG LIVE AIPAC!

Yes, once the Jews do have control we will all become Pals and look how they are treated, target practice for the IDF.

 

[Challenger]

“agent of a foreign principal” means—
(1) any person who acts as an agent, representative, employee, or servant, or any person who acts in any other capacity at the order, request, or under the direction or control, of a foreign principal or of a person any of whose activities are directly or indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed, or subsidized in whole or in major part by a foreign principal, and who directly or through any other person—
(i) engages within the United States in political activities for or in the interests of such foreign principal;
(ii) acts within the United States as a public relations counsel, publicity agent, information-service employee or political consultant for or in the interests of such foreign principal;
(iii) within the United States solicits, collects, disburses, or dispenses contributions, loans, money, or other things of value for or in the interest of such foreign principal; or
(iv) within the United States represents the interests of such foreign principal before any agency or official of the Government of the United States;"

This sounds exactly like AIPAC to me.

 

[montelatici]

montelatici, et al,

This is the old "three-card Monty" trick. First talk about AIPAC --- then switch to AZC.

AIPAC's founder was, in fact an agent of Israel. AIPAC was a spinoff of the American Zionist Council (AZC) which John and Bobby Kennedy forced to register as a Foreign Agent. AIPAC is a de facto Foreign Agent, but has political power to prevent the Government from forcing them to register and there aren't any leaders with balls like John or Bobby Kennedy who would stand up to the Zionists.

To wit:

"Referencing over 1,000 previously classified documents released under a Freedom of Information Act filing, Smith follows Isaiah L. Kenen's path from registered foreign agent for the Israeli government to founder of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee or AIPAC. Smith unearths a formerly secret non-prosecution agreement, the "subvention caveat" reached between the Israel lobby and the US Department of Justice. The agreement reveals a great deal about the latitude of the lobby's operations and the US government's institutional aversion to challenging it. "

America s Defense Line The Justice Department s Battle to Register the Israel Lobby as Agents of a Foreign Government Grant F. Smith Philip Weiss 9780976443728 Amazon.com Books

"This 100,000-strong group has been described as an agent of the Israeli government, and those accusations were substantiated in 2005 when a pentagon analyst plead guilty to passing military secrets to two AIPAC employees en route to Israel. After some political wrangling, all charges were dropped against the two Jewish AIPAC employees in 2009, even though the analyst agreed to testify against the AIPAC employees, and the government had overwhelming evidence to prosecute. It was reported by Time magazine that Jane Harman, a Jewish congresswoman, was bribed by AIPAC to lobby the Department of Justice to drop the spying charges against the AIPAC employees. In 2009, CQ politics reported that Harman was caught on a NSA wiretap telling an Israeli agent that she would lobby the Department of Justice to drop the case."

AIPAC MUST REGISTER AS FOREIGN AGENT - The Petition Site

"A Defense Department analyst pleaded guilty yesterday to passing government secrets to two employees of a pro-Israel lobbying group and revealed for the first time that he also gave classified information directly to an Israeli government official in Washington.

Lawrence A. Franklin told a judge in U.S. District Court in Alexandria that he met at least eight times with Naor Gilon, who was the political officer at the Israeli Embassy before being recalled last summer.....Weissman, 53, of Bethesda, faces one count of conspiracy to illegally communicate national defense information. His attorneys did not return calls late last night. American Israel Public Affairs Committee officials declined comment."

Defense Analyst Guilty in Israeli Espionage Case


"It looks like a jail sentence might not have been all that Larry Franklin, the former Pentagon official convicted of spying for Israel, had to fear in recent years.

Court documents filed last week suggest a Sopranos-like effort to get rid of Franklin, who had agreed to testify against two former AIPAC activists, CQ's Jeff Stein reports."

AIPAC Spy Figure Zionist Wanted Me Dead

(COMMENT)

AIPAC and AZC are two different organization. AZC disbanded.

While you copied a lot of information from the Institute for Research: Middle East Policy Website, you forgot to mention that "Since the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's incorporation in 1963 it has been periodically investigated by the FBI and US Department of Justice. The following archive presents a chronology of publicly released documents with links to other sections of the Israel Lobby Archive, shedding light on the origins and activities of AIPAC." You will note that COL Franklin has never served any prison time for the offense for which he was convicted and the DOJ has never actually taken either Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman to court for trial in the nearly a decade since the alleged offense occurred.

In nearly a quarter century no lobby has been subject to periodic re-investigation more than AIPAC. It comes up clean (no violations) every time.

Investigations into the RNC

Booker burying Lonegan in super PAC cash dash
By Dave Levinthal
October 7, 2013

Supreme Court 'McCutcheon' case could aid GOP
By Michael Beckel
October 7, 2013

Judicial candidates vulnerable to outside spending
By Amy Myers
August 21, 2012

Stealth PACs revealed
By The Center for Public Integrity
February 9, 2000​

Investigations into the DNC

Supreme Court 'McCutcheon' case could aid GOP
By Michael Beckel
October 7, 2013

Silent Partners: Special Report
By Derek Willis andAron Pilhofer
September 25, 2003

Soft money primer
By John Dunbar
September 26, 2002

Buying influence
By The Center for Public Integrity
July 16, 2003​

Investigations are not the sole criteria for the integrity of a Political Action Committee (PAC). If it were so, both the RNC and the DNC would be out of business. Political parties, when in power, often target the opposition to reduce their influence. AIPAC is not exception. It is influential and it has many domestic opponents that would like to see it fade away. That is the nature of American Politics.

Most Respectfully,
R

"The U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 [.pdf] forces Americans to fork hard-earned tax dollars over to Israel’s coffers on the pretext that it is in imminent danger. Yet declassified documents reveal that even the current prime minister once worked inside the state’s clandestine nuclear arms smuggling rings. Transferring foreign aid to the Middle East’s sole nuclear weapons state — which can obviously take care of itself — is not just unseemly and unnecessary. It is illegal.

AIPAC’s publicly available tax return [.pdf] reveals it has now become as seamlessly linked to its foreign principal as its parent organization — the American Zionist Council — was when it was finally ordered by the Kennedy administration to openly register as an Israeli foreign agent in 1962. AIPAC spent $1,541,572 maintaining its Jerusalem office. The office, led by Wendy Senor Singer, is described as the official location for daily meetings with senior Israeli government officials. It is also used to coordinate the visits of supplicant U.S. politicians with funding from a mysterious captive charity of no employees claiming to be an educational organization [.pdf] . The Israeli government’s desires are seamlessly www.sourcewatch.org/index.php transcribed into legislation at AIPAC’s headquarters in Washington — raising the perennial question why AIPAC is not registering as Israel’s foreign agent.

…..(big cut)…

The AIPAC-sponsored U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, signed into law by President Obama on July 27, 2012, makes unprecedented demands on U.S. taxpayers and diplomats. It mandates American economic largess to Israel via high technology, agriculture, medicine, health, pharmaceutical, and energy transfers. It demands funding for Israel Aerospace Industries (a corporation only recently linked to Israeli espionage activities against the U.S.) missile-defense programs and air-refueling tankers and munitions Israel could use to unilaterally set off a wider war with Iran. Israel even won a detour of used weapons from U.S. forces departing Iraq. The aid law extends already generous loan guarantees to Israel.

However, the package also requires the U.S. president to issue to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House Committee on Foreign Affairs a report on the status of Israel’s “qualitative military edge” by Jan. 23, 2013. It is finally time for some hard truths. An honest presidential response to this AIPAC-mandated reporting rider would wipe clean all current and future U.S.-taxpayer-funded obligations to Israel. A truthful presidential assessment would finally tell the American people the following: “Israel has deployed a clandestine nuclear arsenal with some components and materials stolen from the United States. Our foreign aid laws therefore make Israel ineligible for further taxpayer dollars.”

Such a truthful declaration would turn the tables on AIPAC and its small group of donors now pushing Americans to steal from themselves by systematically violating the Symington and Glenn amendments to U.S. foreign aid laws. Ending aid would disentangle unwitting Americans from Israel’s unending conflicts, illegal settlements, systematized abuse of Palestinians, and clandestine nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.

- See more at: AIPAC is seamlessly linked to Israel and should register as foreign agent -- Grant Smith