noonereal
Gold Member
- Jan 16, 2009
- 3,266
- 1,464
- 200
you are an idiotobjective (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
"historians try to be objective and impartial"
That is not what being “objective” is. You apparently just view facts subjectively as you please.
If even “facts” are grey to you, what’s the point of being “objective” or “fact driven”? You are just saying that you view everything (even facts) subjectively.
“Objective statements are facts that can be verified by third parties while subjective statements may or may not be entirely true as they are colored by the opinions of the speaker. i”
https://www.jibc.ca/sites/default/files/community_social_justice/pdf/cl/Objective_vs._Subjective.pdf
this is both subjective and objective
peace