Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 15,114
- 6,457
- 208
Wrong.Congratulations for cracking the code. Race wasn’t a factor in the death of saint Floyd either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong.Congratulations for cracking the code. Race wasn’t a factor in the death of saint Floyd either.
Good point. Although I knew you were stupid, I did not know you were this stupid.It’s kind of stupid to expect that from someone you think is stupid. But who am I to judge.
We won't agree because the protests weren't for a "drug addict." They were held because of police murders and brutality. And if you read the NYPD report on the protests, there is no description of what you posted. Last, drug addiction is not punishable by a knee in the neck for 8 minutes. And a cigarette smoker is a drug addict.Yeah, housewives pushing baby strollers down every main st in America was deserved for a drug addict.
Yeah, a statue in NYC was not totally insane either.
Peaceful? NYC looked like one of those future movies where everything is destroyed. Everything was boarded up after being pilaged and there was not a person on the streets for blocks when its generally wall to wall people
So yes, most protests we peaceful but they were also ridiculous. On this we can agree.
And if you read the NYPD report on the protests, there is no description of what you posted.
Prove it.Wrong.
Well now you do. So then, do you have any contributions you would like to make to the thread? Or has your original grievance about the story in the OP happening in the UK been address satisfactorily? Here are the points since I know navigating the discussion isn’t one of your strengths.Good point. Although I knew you were stupid, I did not know you were this stupid.
Well now you do. So then, do you have any contributions you would like to make to the thread? Or has your original grievance about the story in the OP happening in the UK been address satisfactorily? Here are the points since I know navigating the discussion isn’t one of your strengths.
- additional cases in the US have been provided.
- people in the UK protested the death of George Floyd but not the white UK guy in the OP.
Thoughts, sir smarty pants? Or would you just like to continue hurling personal attacks in an impressive display of your intellect?
Wrong. The protests were not about “police brutality”. Originally, for like the first couple days maybe, but then the systemic racism narrative took over the entire affair.We won't agree because the protests weren't for a "drug addict." They were held because of police murders and brutality. And if you read the NYPD report on the protests, there is no description of what you posted. Last, drug addiction is not punishable by a knee in the neck for 8 minutes. And a cigarette smoker is a drug addict.
That’s it? You come in flailing your arms, screaming about the “UK” and “stupid”. And now you are good? Not a lot of meat there.I made my comments already. Grown up. Get over your white grievance crap.
That’s it? You come in flailing your arms, screaming about the “UK” and “stupid”. And now you are good? Not a lot of meat there.
What “white grievance crap”? Was it white people protesting the death of a white person? No, that’s the whole point.I made my comments already. Grown up. Get over your white grievance crap.
What “white grievance crap”? Was it white people protesting the death of a white person? No, that’s the whole point.
Im not saying that it’s unfair for whites. I’m not arguing that white people should protest like 2020. No, I’m pointing out the racial disparity in the reaction to these deaths and the political perception of George Floyd’s death.
Of course, I might be stupid but I do realize you aren’t trying to make any actual point. You are just hurling insults and doing the best you can.
I’m sure a scholar like yourself can try to muster something. Certainly that’s why you keep returning to post? I believe in you, just do your best.What more is there to say to a "little man?"
What? You didn’t support the “protests”? Why do you support police brutality? Why would you not support protesting the police targeting black people for being black? Why do you hate black people?Like I said, I thought the protests ridiculous but I find your white grievances just as moronic.
Retard. I posted 3 for every 1 you posted. Only problem? You posted fake ones.LOL I didn’t cheat.
I told you from the beginning there was no way for you to produce 3 black death for every white death. It’s just not statistically possible. True to liberal form you ignored the facts and insisted only playing a silly game. Now that you realize that I was right, you are going to lose your silly game, you are desperate to claim victory.
3 to 1 just isn’t possible. That should be “obvious” to you considering you were given the data.
Fine, scratch all of those. All 40 of them. The 120 you posted can count towards the 175 I posted. That still leaves 405 names that you haven’t even attempted to produce in response to the 175. You claim you have “lists ready” so you shouldn’t be a problem. After you post the remaining 100 or so from your Facebook list (super reputable btw) you will still need to post something like 300 additional and unique names.
You want to establish these rules then they apply to you as well. If you post any duplicate names as you pull them from Facebook and Wikipedia and wherever then the whole batch you posted gets tossed out. Fair is fair.
A jury has already done that.Prove it.
There was not a single piece of evidence presented in the trial that race had anything to do with his death. Chauvin was not charged with or convicted of a hate crime. The death of George Floyd had nothing to do with race.
What? You didn’t support the “protests”? Why do you support police brutality? Why would you not support protesting the police targeting black people for being black? Why do you hate black people?
That is the single dumbest thing anyoneGrow up.
I am something you can't understand. Reasoned, even handed, objective and fact driven.
There is no this side or that side.
No black or white
Everything are shades of grey.
That is the single dumbest thing anyone
has said in this entire stupid thread. How exactly do you go from being “fact driven” to “everything is shades of grey” in the same declaration? “Objective facts” that are “shades of grey”. FFS
objective (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.Reasoned, even handed, objective and fact driven.
There is no this side or that side.
No black or white
Everything are shade of grey.
That is not what being “objective” is. You apparently just view facts subjectively as you please.Interpretation of facts are grey, idiot.