What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

You anti gunners need a constitutional lesson

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Here it is
20220814_074047.jpg

Class dismissed. God save the Republic.
 

multivita-man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2022
Messages
657
Reaction score
291
Points
143
I mostly agreed with the outcome of Heller; I just didn't agree with all of Scalia's reasoning. Still don't. But that case was at least within the realm of the sane. But the recent court rulings are, I think, fictionalized renderings of original intent and they also tend to hyper-focus on gun rights that are supposedly found in the 2A while completely ignoring other parts of the Constitution, such as the implicit powers that states and local communities have to police their own jurisdictions and maintain public safety.
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
I mostly agreed with the outcome of Heller; I just didn't agree with all of Scalia's reasoning. Still don't. But that case was at least within the realm of the sane. But the recent court rulings are, I think, fictionalized renderings of original intent and they also tend to hyper-focus on gun rights that are supposedly found in the 2A while completely ignoring other parts of the Constitution, such as the implicit powers that states and local communities have to police their own jurisdictions and maintain public safety.
And your wrong.
 

johngaltshrugged

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
3,835
Reaction score
7,614
Points
1,938
The 2 biggest fallacious claims against the 2A are that it only pertained to muskets & only meant for hunting rights.
When the progbots try to claim either one of these idiotic suppositions it proves how unintelligent they really are.

It also shows what utter contempt their masters have for them by feeding them this complete BS, because they know they will eat it up & go all insane about complete nonsense.

"Shall not be infringed" means exactly that
 
Last edited:

ThunderKiss1965

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
10,698
Reaction score
3,707
Points
360
Location
GNO
I mostly agreed with the outcome of Heller; I just didn't agree with all of Scalia's reasoning. Still don't. But that case was at least within the realm of the sane. But the recent court rulings are, I think, fictionalized renderings of original intent and they also tend to hyper-focus on gun rights that are supposedly found in the 2A while completely ignoring other parts of the Constitution, such as the implicit powers that states and local communities have to police their own jurisdictions and maintain public safety.
Shall not be infringed is as simple and straight forward as can be there is only one way that can be interpreted. State and local governments can not make laws that interfere with a Constitutional right.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
68,366
Reaction score
26,027
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually
Here it is View attachment 682220
Class dismissed. God save the Republic.
There are no ‘anti-gunners’ – whatever that’s supposed to be.

To support perfectly lawful and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures is not to be ‘anti-gun.’
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
68,366
Reaction score
26,027
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
68,366
Reaction score
26,027
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually
And your wrong.
Conservatives must accept all of the Heller ruling, which most refuse to do.

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
There are no ‘anti-gunners’ – whatever that’s supposed to be.

To support perfectly lawful and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures is not to be ‘anti-gun.’
You're an antiguner do that makes you a liar.
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
And?

Preaching to the choir – it’s been long acknowledged that modern firearms are within the scope of the Second Amendment.
Well dumbass why are you antiguners pushing for gun bans?
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
Conservatives must accept all of the Heller ruling, which most refuse to do.

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
Dude you anti gunners love to cherry pick.. the only firearm the supreme court ruled against in Miller was short barreled guns. There were automatic firearm in public use at the time of the ruling of Miller. so cut the shit smart people are not buying your lies.
 

multivita-man

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2022
Messages
657
Reaction score
291
Points
143
Shall not be infringed is as simple and straight forward as can be there is only one way that can be interpreted. State and local governments can not make laws that interfere with a Constitutional right.

So is "Congress shall make no law" abridging freedom of speech and all that. Just because we have the freedom of speech doesn't mean we can exercise that right to extremes. I can't stand out in front of your yard on a sidewalk and yell Trump sucks at midnight just so I can wake up you and your neighbors.
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
So is "Congress shall make no law" abridging freedom of speech and all that. Just because we have the freedom of speech doesn't mean we can exercise that right to extremes. I can't stand out in front of your yard on a sidewalk and yell Trump sucks at midnight just so I can wake up you and your neighbors.
You have the right to open your mouth where as I have the right to close it
 

Blues Man

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
23,496
Reaction score
9,084
Points
490
There are no ‘anti-gunners’ – whatever that’s supposed to be.

To support perfectly lawful and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures is not to be ‘anti-gun.’
Like what exactly?
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
That’s a SC ruling.

Just like Roe.

What happened to that one?
Thing is roe was never a Constitutionally protected right. It was a right given by the judicial system.
 
OP
bigrebnc1775

bigrebnc1775

][][][% NC Sheepdog
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
87,716
Reaction score
16,254
Points
2,220
Location
Kannapolis, N.C.
No, in that context we'd then we'd both end up spending the night in a local jail.
No you would never go to jail. Just leave it to your imagination how worms eat.
 

Yarddog

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
13,994
Reaction score
7,311
Points
1,055
Here it is View attachment 682220
Class dismissed. God save the Republic.



There are also those Ive heard say that we shoud only be allowed guns as part of a regulated militia, Regulated by the state. That would be wrong because the entire Bill of Rights was intended to be about the rights of citizens APART from the government.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top