Yes we can

Desertification need not be permanent.







Yes, the increase in CO2 has been regreening the Sahara. Multiple threads have been posted over the years.

Now you try and claim it......

What a sad person.

What a dumb ass you continue to be. No, the increase in CO2, if continued, will negate all these efforts. And you claim to be a geologist. LOL


CO2 destroys plant life? Is this some alien CO2?


He has finally gone over the edge. He must have got that autographed picture of Greta that he ordered and it has sent him into a hysterical frenzy...He is in the midst of a Greta inspired full on swoon...
 
Most of the countries around the world that have GREENED the desert have done so with DeSalination plants........................A move that California fought tooth and nail against............UNTIL they were hit with Water Restrictions..................and go SHIT WE ARE OUT OF WATER....

Same with the Forests.............who have created a bug infested dying forest due to their policies.......at least 5 million trees are dead there because of their policies........and now they are burning to the ground due to there stupidity...........

This is just a GREEN BS MACHINE THREAD..........Funny coming from the people who fought tooth and nail against what turned the desert to a garden all over the world.

LOL
What a silly ass liar you are. Name the ocean near the Loess Plateu? Desalination remains a very expensive process, and I know of know area where vast acreages have been reclaimed using desalinated water.
That may be so in that location..........but in California the GREEN MECCA of the liberals .......they fought tooth and nail against it...............

And their problems with not controlling their forests..........well they are burning to the ground because of it.





Hell, Santa Barbara built a desal plant back in the 1980s but never used it. So they then sold it like the political retards they are.
 


Silicosis................China mining..............and the cost to bring us SOLAR PANELS CHEAP........

You ran away on the other thread Old Rocks...............

And in this one you post strip mining pictures when that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA for SOLAR PANELS.
 
Desertification need not be permanent.







Yes, the increase in CO2 has been regreening the Sahara. Multiple threads have been posted over the years.

Now you try and claim it......

What a sad person.

What a dumb ass you continue to be. No, the increase in CO2, if continued, will negate all these efforts. And you claim to be a geologist. LOL


Sorry rocks...but he planet is greening, and it has been for decades. And science is admitting that it is due to the increase in CO2. CO2 is, after all plant food...the empirical evidence of greater plant growth when more CO2 is present is undeniable, unless you are a world class, top shelf science denier. The empirical evidence that CO2 is having an effect on the global climate, however, is non existent.

The fact is that 74% of the globe has greened since 1981 and CO2 is to blame...and the fact that the earth has further warmed out of the little ice age.

Dem seltsamen Ergrünen der Welt auf der Spur - wissenschaft.de

Clip (translated):
It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land.From orbit, our planet as a whole would have to look increasingly browner, one might think. But, astonishingly, the opposite is true: according to a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, satellite observations show that vegetation has been greened over the past three decades in parts of Asia, Europe, South America, Central North America and South-East Australia.There are regions that become browner, but the bottom line is that a larger area on our planet is green than browned, it concludes.In the title theme "The World Is Greened", the bdw author Jan Berndorff investigates the questions of what lies behind the surprising effect, what the development means and how it could go further.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12257-8.pdf

74-percent-of-the-globe-is-greening-due-to-CO2-and-climate-change-Chen-2019.jpg


Detected global agricultural greening from satellite data - ScienceDirect

Global-greening-in-agricultural-areas-Gao-2019.jpg


He is a geologist and is apparently keeping up with the actual science...You, on the other hand are a hand waving hysteric who wouldn't know science if it bit you in the ass..and when it does, I am quite sure that you are more than willing to deny it in favor of your quasi religious belief in whatever your cult leaders tell you to believe.

And interesting article, but one that is misleading. Here is one of the statements that shows how it is misleading;

"It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land."

In other words, forests cut down or burned, and replaced with crops or shrubs, which do not contain anywhere near the amount of carbon that the forests did. Also, as the article noted, the rise in CO2 has a very negative affect, and this years floods and fires have certainly reduce the LIA. As the heat increases, there will be areas in which plants can no longer grow.
 
Desertification need not be permanent.







Yes, the increase in CO2 has been regreening the Sahara. Multiple threads have been posted over the years.

Now you try and claim it......

What a sad person.

What a dumb ass you continue to be. No, the increase in CO2, if continued, will negate all these efforts. And you claim to be a geologist. LOL


So, these CO2 generators destroy plant life? Really?

CO2 Generator for Plants: Amazon.com
 


Silicosis................China mining..............and the cost to bring us SOLAR PANELS CHEAP........

You ran away on the other thread Old Rocks...............

And in this one you post strip mining pictures when that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA for SOLAR PANELS.




Oh that's okay though. Greenies don't care about brown people. You can kill as many as you want so long as it's in third world countries.

Same with rare raptors. So long as its windmills killing them its A-OK.
 
Desertification need not be permanent.







Yes, the increase in CO2 has been regreening the Sahara. Multiple threads have been posted over the years.

Now you try and claim it......

What a sad person.

What a dumb ass you continue to be. No, the increase in CO2, if continued, will negate all these efforts. And you claim to be a geologist. LOL


Sorry rocks...but he planet is greening, and it has been for decades. And science is admitting that it is due to the increase in CO2. CO2 is, after all plant food...the empirical evidence of greater plant growth when more CO2 is present is undeniable, unless you are a world class, top shelf science denier. The empirical evidence that CO2 is having an effect on the global climate, however, is non existent.

The fact is that 74% of the globe has greened since 1981 and CO2 is to blame...and the fact that the earth has further warmed out of the little ice age.

Dem seltsamen Ergrünen der Welt auf der Spur - wissenschaft.de

Clip (translated):
It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land.From orbit, our planet as a whole would have to look increasingly browner, one might think. But, astonishingly, the opposite is true: according to a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, satellite observations show that vegetation has been greened over the past three decades in parts of Asia, Europe, South America, Central North America and South-East Australia.There are regions that become browner, but the bottom line is that a larger area on our planet is green than browned, it concludes.In the title theme "The World Is Greened", the bdw author Jan Berndorff investigates the questions of what lies behind the surprising effect, what the development means and how it could go further.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12257-8.pdf

74-percent-of-the-globe-is-greening-due-to-CO2-and-climate-change-Chen-2019.jpg


Detected global agricultural greening from satellite data - ScienceDirect

Global-greening-in-agricultural-areas-Gao-2019.jpg


He is a geologist and is apparently keeping up with the actual science...You, on the other hand are a hand waving hysteric who wouldn't know science if it bit you in the ass..and when it does, I am quite sure that you are more than willing to deny it in favor of your quasi religious belief in whatever your cult leaders tell you to believe.

And interesting article, but one that is misleading. Here is one of the statements that shows how it is misleading;

"It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land."

In other words, forests cut down or burned, and replaced with crops or shrubs, which do not contain anywhere near the amount of carbon that the forests did. Also, as the article noted, the rise in CO2 has a very negative affect, and this years floods and fires have certainly reduce the LIA. As the heat increases, there will be areas in which plants can no longer grow.


CO2 actually cuts down forests.

Wow
 


Silicosis................China mining..............and the cost to bring us SOLAR PANELS CHEAP........

You ran away on the other thread Old Rocks...............

And in this one you post strip mining pictures when that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA for SOLAR PANELS.

But that is not happening here. At least at present. But the orange ass you kiss would do away with the regulations that prevent that here. However, here black lung is still a major problem for coal miners.
Resurgence of crippling black lung disease seen in U.S. coal miners
 
Desertification need not be permanent.







Yes, the increase in CO2 has been regreening the Sahara. Multiple threads have been posted over the years.

Now you try and claim it......

What a sad person.

What a dumb ass you continue to be. No, the increase in CO2, if continued, will negate all these efforts. And you claim to be a geologist. LOL


Sorry rocks...but he planet is greening, and it has been for decades. And science is admitting that it is due to the increase in CO2. CO2 is, after all plant food...the empirical evidence of greater plant growth when more CO2 is present is undeniable, unless you are a world class, top shelf science denier. The empirical evidence that CO2 is having an effect on the global climate, however, is non existent.

The fact is that 74% of the globe has greened since 1981 and CO2 is to blame...and the fact that the earth has further warmed out of the little ice age.

Dem seltsamen Ergrünen der Welt auf der Spur - wissenschaft.de

Clip (translated):
It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land.From orbit, our planet as a whole would have to look increasingly browner, one might think. But, astonishingly, the opposite is true: according to a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, satellite observations show that vegetation has been greened over the past three decades in parts of Asia, Europe, South America, Central North America and South-East Australia.There are regions that become browner, but the bottom line is that a larger area on our planet is green than browned, it concludes.In the title theme "The World Is Greened", the bdw author Jan Berndorff investigates the questions of what lies behind the surprising effect, what the development means and how it could go further.


https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12257-8.pdf

74-percent-of-the-globe-is-greening-due-to-CO2-and-climate-change-Chen-2019.jpg


Detected global agricultural greening from satellite data - ScienceDirect

Global-greening-in-agricultural-areas-Gao-2019.jpg


He is a geologist and is apparently keeping up with the actual science...You, on the other hand are a hand waving hysteric who wouldn't know science if it bit you in the ass..and when it does, I am quite sure that you are more than willing to deny it in favor of your quasi religious belief in whatever your cult leaders tell you to believe.

And interesting article, but one that is misleading. Here is one of the statements that shows how it is misleading;

"It seems paradoxical: Although the rainforest in the tropics is extensively destroyed, the vegetation on Earth has been spreading for decades, according to satellite data.In the December issue, bild of science sheds light on what this greening is all about.In addition, the title theme includes a look at the sometimes problematic state of the German forest.Bad news on the way – Climate change and environmental degradation threaten to devastate our planet, many studies show: forests are being cut down and droughts and soil erosion are destroying more and more areas of land."

In other words, forests cut down or burned, and replaced with crops or shrubs, which do not contain anywhere near the amount of carbon that the forests did. Also, as the article noted, the rise in CO2 has a very negative affect, and this years floods and fires have certainly reduce the LIA. As the heat increases, there will be areas in which plants can no longer grow.






Is this written by the same moron who claimed snow would become so rare that children wouldn't even know what it was?


I just got done shoveling 18 inches of that global warming horse shit a couple of days ago and am going to have to do at least another foot this coming week.

That's the problem with your heroes. They live in a computer derived fantasy land and have no clue what the real world is like.

Just like you.
 


Silicosis................China mining..............and the cost to bring us SOLAR PANELS CHEAP........

You ran away on the other thread Old Rocks...............

And in this one you post strip mining pictures when that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA for SOLAR PANELS.

But that is not happening here. At least at present. But the orange ass you kiss would do away with the regulations that prevent that here. However, here black lung is still a major problem for coal miners.
Resurgence of crippling black lung disease seen in U.S. coal miners

That is because we have OSHA..............They don't have it in ASIA and Africa NOW DO THEY.

And as I proved to you in another thread it is HOW WE GET THE PANELS CHEAPER.

You showed U.S. companies in that thread and I USED YOUR LINK AGAINST YOU. As they were only assembling the panels here...........and were getting the solar panels from ASIA.

I then proved to you that 80% of the panels come from the places where the people are DYING FROM SILICOSIS............Getting the Silica to make SOLAR PANELS...

Not all dying were for the Panels......Concrete,.......and circuit boards are key also........

But in this thread you PUT UP A COAL STRIP MINING PIC..........and that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA.

DERP.
 


Silicosis................China mining..............and the cost to bring us SOLAR PANELS CHEAP........

You ran away on the other thread Old Rocks...............

And in this one you post strip mining pictures when that is EXACTLY HOW THEY GET THE SILICA for SOLAR PANELS.

But that is not happening here. At least at present. But the orange ass you kiss would do away with the regulations that prevent that here. However, here black lung is still a major problem for coal miners.
Resurgence of crippling black lung disease seen in U.S. coal miners





Correct, you farm out your misery to third world countries. How do you think china keeps the price of their solar panels so low, idiot?

Environmental laws cost money to adhere to.

Duh.

You really are stupid aren't you.
 
It's tough to be an environmentalist these days Old one....

~S~




No, it's really easy. You just need to park your brain at the door and ignore factual reality.
 
You gonna run away and HIDE OLD ROCKS AGAIN.

I'm calling your Hypocritical ass out.
 

Which Substances Make Up the RCRA 8 Metals?

Cadmium
Cadmium is blue-grey soft metal. It is a byproduct of copper and zinc production. Shellfish, mushrooms, dried seaweed, mussels, and cocoa powder are also naturally rich in the toxic metal. Cadmium can be ingested by humans via secondhand smoke. It can cause harm to the kidneys and liver. Its regulated level is 1 ppm.

Chromium
Chromium is a steel-grey-colored, brittle metal most often used, as you might expect, in chrome electroplating. But its earliest use can be dated back to the Qin Dynasty in China, where chromium oxide coated the weapons of the funereal Terracotta Army. Trace amounts of the metal are necessary for human health, but overexposure to the substance inside the body can lead to liver, kidney, and blood stream damage. The EPA regulates chromium at 5 ppm.

Lead
Lead’s health hazards are well-documented, yet it is still found in many things, including crafted metals, ammunition, old paints, and batteries. A naturally-occurring substance, lead is released into the atmosphere or leaches into water supplies during the burning of fossil fuels and certain manufacturing processes. Exposure to lead can cause lead poisoning, which has been shown to be deleterious to the cognitive functionality of the brain, and also a possible cancer-causing agent. The regulated level of lead is 5 ppm.
 
No, it's really easy. You just need to park your brain at the door and ignore factual reality.

More i read diversions, equating globalism to environmentalism concerns is as disingenuous as equating blue cheese to the moon...

~S~
 
No, it's really easy. You just need to park your brain at the door and ignore factual reality.

More i read diversions, equating globalism to environmentalism concerns is as disingenuous as equating blue cheese to the moon...

~S~






Greenies export the terrible working conditions to third world countries whose workers don't enjoy the protections of first world laws.

Ample evidence has been shown to you in this very thread. And, like clockwork you ignore that because ultimately you people don't care about brown people save as a tool you can use.
 
Solar Panels Linked To Rise In Greenhouse Gas; NF3 More Potent Than CO2

Mainly used as a cleaning agent to clear away silicone, NF3 is usually eliminated during use, but a small percentage can still leak into the atmosphere. At this point, it is unclear just how much has been leaked but scientists have warned that NF3 is effective at trapping heat and can remain in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. Seeker also noted that NF3, despite contributing little to greenhouse gas emissions compared to CO2, is actually 17,200 times more potent.


Dr. Michael Prather of the University of California, Irvine, said that while NF3 will not create a climate problem, its numbers still add up. Thus, everyone should pay attention to the small things that add up, especially considering how dangerous it could be in the long run.

Despite the rise of NF3 being linked to solar panels, environmentalists are still quick to defend their stance. Tim Donaghy, a senior research specialist for Greenpeace, said, "The impact of NF3 as a global warming gas is big on a per-molecule basis, but the benefits of carbon-free energy from solar panels swamp the negative impacts due to NF3 emissions."
 

Forum List

Back
Top