WTF!! Killer Alec Baldwin given his own REALITY SHOW! Is the world insane?

[Scoutster]

He admits cocking the hammer, given the model and age of this gun because they wanted to use that for the movie. That doesn’t have much trigger pull, once the hammer is cocked back, it wouldn’t take much pull at all on that trigger for the hammer to fall. The other concern is he potentially didn’t lock back hammer all the way, and accidentally he let it go, the hammer went down and set off the round. The gun did not fire itself some of you people need to get that through your head. He should never be involved in handling guns again that’s a bare minimum in my opinion.

New Analysis of ‘Rust’ Gun Finds Alec Baldwin Must Have Pulled Trigger (Published 2023)

The actor has repeatedly denied pulling the trigger of a revolver that went off on the film’s set, killing its cinematographer. The gun was not supposed to be loaded with live ammunition.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Curried Goats]

Go take an English composition class. I implied nothing. I said No one else pulled the trigger.

Right. No one else. I know what else means. Do you you simple fucktard?

What you said is that no one besides Baldwin pulled that trigger, implying he did. Who the fuck taught you to read and write and express yourself?

You assumed what you wanted to hear.

I assumed nothing. I know what words mean.

As usual you got full of yourself and crossed your juvenile trolling responses. I didn't use any names, salty or otherwise and I didn't say Baldwin pulled the trigger. I said he was negligent in the handling of a gun resulting in the death of another human. He pointed it and she is dead. He is guilty of negligent homocide as had it not been for his negligence as he was in control of the weapon at the time of discharge. To try to deny those accepted facts is just trolling---but its what you do best.

It's not trolling to point out to your frail white self that he was in fact not found guilty of anything. There there.

As he was the PRODUCER of the film--he is the employer.

He is one of the producers and they hired someone to maintain the weapons and firearms safety on set and she was negligent. If they hadn't bothered to hire one at all then maybe you might have a point about his negligence as annemployer but that was actually the job he and the producers hired her to do.

 

[Concerned American]

He is one of the producers and they hired someone to maintain the weapons and firearms safety on set and she was negligent. If they hadn't bothered to hire one at all then maybe you might have a point about his negligence as annemployer but that was actually the job he and the producers hired her to do.

She didn't do her job--fire her. He pointed the gun at a human. He is the person with ultimate control. That gun would have layed harmlessly on a table forever and no one would have ever been harmed with it. A moron who should not have been given access to it picked it up, pointed it at a human and a projectile from that weapon murdered a person. Spin it anyway you want, it still has the same outcome. Alec Baldwin is guilty of negligent homocide. Now run your little fragile bigoted racist butt down the road crowing your nonsense to someone else. You're dismissed.

 

[Curried Goats]

She didn't do her job--fire her. He pointed the gun at a human. He is the person with ultimate control. That gun would have layed harmlessly on a table forever and no one would have ever been harmed with it. A moron who should not have been given access to it picked it up, pointed it at a human and a projectile from that weapon murdered a person. Spin it anyway you want, it still has the same outcome. Alec Baldwin is guilty of negligent homocide. Now run your little fragile bigoted racist butt down the road crowing your nonsense to someone else. You're dismissed.

You're the one trying spin. Baldwin wasn't convicted of anything and I'm not running anywhere. I'll laugh at you for as long as you want to play pretend.

 

[JoeB131]

Sorry, his incompetence led to her death like it or not he pointed the gun at her. That’s what he did and now she’s dead. I don’t think he meant to do it, but he needed training and basic firearm handling, and he obviously didn’t have it and neither did anybody on the set of his movie that he had strong control of!

How was it his incompetence?

The Armorer handed him a loaded gun. Seems it was her fault.

That's why she's in jail and he isn't.

 

[Dekster]

Exculpatory evidence.?? Tell us about that. I say you're making it up.

I don't need to tell you about it. It was why the court tossed the case. If you are unfamiliar with that perhaps you should actually research the case yourself.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What does cocking and pulling the trigger on an empty gun do? Or a gun loaded with blanks? The question isn't whether he meant to aim and fire the gun as that dipshit StatesRightsForever would have us believe from his premise, but it's about whether he thought it was loaded with live rounds and meant to take life of another human being. There is absolutely no indication that was the intent.

.


The gun was not empty.

The responsibility to ascertain this or the opposite fact was Baldwin's. He blew it and killed a person.




.

 

[Curried Goats]

.


The gun was not empty.

The responsibility to ascertain this or the opposite fact was Baldwin's. He blew it and killed a person.




.

It was known it wasn't empty. The director who handed him the gun opened the barrel and declared it was loaded with blanks and handed it to him as per that directors testimony.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

It was known it wasn't empty. The director who handed him the gun opened the barrel and declared it was loaded with blanks and handed it to him as per that directors testimony.

.




The director didn't pull the trigger.




.

 

[struth]

You're the one trying spin. Baldwin wasn't convicted of anything and I'm not running anywhere. I'll laugh at you for as long as you want to play pretend.

Alec Baldiwin got white liberal privledge.

Had he been black, the Demklan would have hung him.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

Why don't you explain why he wanted to kill the cinematographer in broad daylight with a hundred witnesses...

Baldwin is a wacko who has had numerous public meltdowns over the years. He is impulsive and doesn't think things thru. But he knows this much - as long as he hates trump, the press will protect him.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

He admits cocking the hammer, given the model and age of this gun because they wanted to use that for the movie.

And there is no reason for him to point the gum at a stagehand and cock the hammer. Unless he loaded the gun and wanted to kill halyna.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

And there is no reason for him to point the gum at a stagehand and cock the hammer. Unless he loaded the gun and wanted to kill halyna.

.

First thing I learned from any shooting instructor. The rules are posted at every shooting range.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

.

First thing I learned from any shooting instructor. The rules are posted at every shooting range.

View attachment 1082809

for some reason actors in movies are allowed to point guns at other people if that's what the script calls for. That was NOT the case here . Halyna was not in the movie. She was a camerawoman.

 

[JoeB131]

for some reason actors in movies are allowed to point guns at other people if that's what the script calls for. That was NOT the case here . Halyna was not in the movie. She was a camerawoman.

Right, and the direction was to point the gun at the camera to get a muzzle shot.

Come on, guy, the only reason you bleach drinkers want Baldwin to be guilty is that he criticized Cheeto Hitler.

 

[Fang]

Three people are responsible. The armorer, assistant director and the actor.

I understand the armorer got 18 months. Seems rather light to me considering her action (or in-action) directly led to someone’s death. But apparently that was the maximum sentence for involuntary manslaughter in New Mexico.

The assistant director actually handed the gun the Baldwin and even declared it a “cold gun”. He deserved jail time but got away with 6 months probation.

This brings me to Baldwin. He bears some responsibility but IMO not as much as the armorer and assistant director.

I think they all got off with light sentences (in Baldwin’s case no sentence). Another human being lost her life due to gross incompetence and complete mishandling of a firearm by 3 people. Baldwin should have received some sentence even if it was probation. Even though its the armorer and assistant director’s jobs to check the gun, once it was in Baldwin’s hands it was his responsibility to check it. With that said, I still place the majority of the blame on the armorer.

 

[struth]

Right, and the direction was to point the gun at the camera to get a muzzle shot.

Come on, guy, the only reason you bleach drinkers want Baldwin to be guilty is that he criticized Cheeto Hitler.

Alec was the director, he director himself to put a loaded gun and fire it, murdering the woman

He’s a killer

The case got tossed on a technically, wasn’t even a not guilty like OJ

 

[Concerned American]

Three people are responsible. The armorer, assistant director and the actor.

I understand the armorer got 18 months. Seems rather light to me considering her action (or in-action) directly led to someone’s death. But apparently that was the maximum sentence for involuntary manslaughter in New Mexico.

The assistant director actually handed the gun the Baldwin and even declared it a “cold gun”. He deserved jail time but got away with 6 months probation.

This brings me to Baldwin. He bears some responsibility but IMO not as much as the armorer and assistant director.

I think they all got off with light sentences (in Baldwin’s case no sentence). Another human being lost her life due to gross incompetence and complete mishandling of a firearm by 3 people. Baldwin should have received some sentence even if it was probation. Even though its the armorer and assistant director’s jobs to check the gun, once it was in Baldwin’s hands it was his responsibility to check it. With that said, I still place the majority of the blame on the armorer.

Baldwin has ultimate responsibility. He held the gun. He pointed the gun. The gun fired and a person was killed. The person holding the gun is responsible for ensuring the gun is safe. Period, end of story.

 

[Fang]

Baldwin has ultimate responsibility. He held the gun. He pointed the gun. The gun fired and a person was killed. The person holding the gun is responsible for ensuring the gun is safe. Period, end of story.

Yes he is responsible. But this was a movie set, not a hunting trip. The armorer and assistant director specifically are tasked with making sure the weapons are safe and the actors are trained. This is the armor’s #1 job. The assistant director handed it to Baldwin and told him it was not loaded. Baldwin does have responsibility as anyone does who is handed a gun. But Baldin was also trying to get through a scene. This is why the armorer is specifically tasked with this responsibility with the assistant director being a close 2nd.

 

[Concerned American]

This is the armor’s #1 job.

The person wielding the weapon's #1 job is to ensure the gun is safe. Rule #1 of gun safety taught in ANY firearms class.