The evidence is undisputed. He admits he pointed the gun at the person without ensuring the weapon was safe. Have you ever heard of prima facie? Baldwin escaped prosecution due to prosecutorial incompetence. Nothing else.
Not according to the judge. Apparently there is even some dispute to whether he pulled the trigger. Baldwin claims he didn't and he's not responsible for the maintence of that firearm. The person convicted of involuntary manslaughter was.
Liberal judge, liberal state, liberal defendant. The judge was correct in calling out the prosecutorial misconduct but the result should have been a mistrial not a dismissal. It is a miscarriage of justice but I am aware that you are as jaded as the liberals who found Baldwin not responsible. It happens. The judgements will come one day.
What can ya say. Lefties love murderers.
What names? Are you claiming that anything I posted is not true? If so, feel free to disprove any of it. It is all public knowledge. But you can continue to try to satisfy your inner child with the juvenile emojis.That's a lot of salty name calling and not a lot of evidence.
There there.
The part where you say he pulled the trigger. His testimony is he didn't. Now where is your evidence?
So now it isn't calling "salty" names, it is falsely accusing me of saying he pulled the trigger. Please link to that. I said "No one else pulled the trigger." You responded with something about the person responsible for the maintenance. That is irrelevant. Baldwin, as the person holding the weapon, was responsible for ensuring the gun was safe. He failed. He pointed the weapon at a human. The weapon discharged and the result was a fatality. None of what I stated is in dispute by anyone. Baldwin is the only person who is responsible for that death. He is guilty of negligent homocide no matter how you want to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend your liberal heeeero.
I need you to understand this, firearms don’t go off by themselves magically. Stop being foolish and implying it somehow magically happened.
That shows how stupid you are. Movie scripts often call for someone to fire a blank gun at someone in the movie. They never call for doing that to the cinematographer. Makes no sense to do that. THINKAnd? I understand what a red herring is. Do you you dumb fuck?
What does her being a cinematographer have to do with my point that there is no indication his intention was to murder anyone?
Exculpatory evidence.?? Tell us about that. I say you're making it up.
You are another idiot who thinks baldwin fired the gun at an actress in the movie. That is not what happened, you moron. Halyna was NOT IN THE MOVIE.
Of course baldwin says that. But he either pulled the trigger or thumbed back the hammer part way and let it fall. Both are inexcusable. THE WOMAN SHOT WAS NOT IN THE MOVIE.
Run along. You've already lost.
Why don't you explain why he wanted to kill the cinematographer in broad daylight with a hundred witnesses...
Yep. You understand they were describing different things right, Dipshit? One was your salty ass post were you cried about liberals a dozen times or something and the was about your dipshit argument that he purposely aimed and pulled the trigger.
No one else pulled the trigger is a sentence imply Baldwin did. The link I provided said he testified that he hadnt.
Nope. It wasn't his gun. He was at work using company equipment. The upkeep on said equipment isn't his responsibility.
Except the part about him pulling the trigger and the maintence of a gun belonging to his employer as being his.
Not according to a court of law that already found the person responsible for firearm safety and maintenance on set, guilty.
No shit. The fact that there was supposed to be a blank there should be an indication to your rotting white brain that he didn't intend to shoot anyone. She happened to be in the path of what should of been a blank round. Dipshit. Now either you were playing stupid for the purpose of your argument or you are just that stupid that you actually needed that explained to you. I'm inclined to believe the latter.
She was working on the movie though, right. Do you know what a movie is little boy?
Well ..... inexcusable to you. The court did excuse it. Literally.
Observations of reality are not your strong suit, are they?
Go take an English composition class. I implied nothing. I said No one else pulled the trigger. You assumed what you wanted to hear. As usual you got full of yourself and crossed your juvenile trolling responses. I didn't use any names, salty or otherwise and I didn't say Baldwin pulled the trigger. I said he was negligent in the handling of a gun resulting in the death of another human. He pointed it and she is dead. He is guilty of negligent homocide as had it not been for his negligence as he was in control of the weapon at the time of discharge. To try to deny those accepted facts is just trolling---but its what you do best.
As he was the PRODUCER of the film--he is the employer.
