cuckoo . . . not me. My CD case appears in the OP of this thread 'and' you are at liberty to believe in Loyal Bushie/Obama Fairy Tales if that blows air up your skirt . . . 
Hi Bern with Eots mentioned:
Eots is the guy willing to entertain himself by arguing with "Building Fires Did It" Morons
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2THs3oNooM]Bern Has A LOT Of Air Up His Dress . . .[/ame]
GL,
Terral
Hi Gam:
Yes. There is a difference between thermate froth and torch slag 'and' yes Gam is full of crap for even trying to push this "cutting torch did it" thesis
Bullshit. You look at the two pictures. The one I posted and the one you posted and tell me the differences. There are none.
That's a bogus video because you cut out the collapse of the mechanical penthouse into the building itself. Why are you ignoring this? Because it fits your views better? 6.6 seconds is bullshit. It was LONGER than that because the collapse STARTED with the collapse of the penthouse. How sad you are trying to mislead people.
Let's examine the evidence again in this picture:
Look at the 'Severed Column End' segments that are scattered throughout the debris pile. These column sections were obviously 'cut' BEFORE they fell to become part of the debris pile having NOTHING to do with any demo workers. These columns were CUT during the Controlled Demolition Process to THEN have debris fall on top of them during the collapse. I KNOW FOR A FACT that WTC-7 was taken down using Controlled Demolition by all of these Controlled Demolition Signatures, but you have no explanation for HOW all of these massive steel connections were 'cut' before the skyscraper collapsed in the first place. The idea that thousands of these cuts were made by demo workers 'after' the collapse IS STUPID beyond our collective abilities to fathom. Your silly notion is that a Demo Supervisor ordered his men to climb a ladder and make 45-degree angle cuts . . .
. . . FOR WHAT REASON????? No sir. That massive box columns was 'cut' using a thermate shape charge 'during the CD process' and AFTER the column line above was deliberately compromised. The massive columns above this one were also 'cut' at 45-degree angles in opposite directions, so that this column sliding off the lower pedestal broke the back of the entire 47-story column line. The inner columns are taken out first to allow the center of the skyscraper to collapse first. Then the outer columns are 'cut' to allow all outer walls to collapse in this 'Controlled Demolition.'
Here is how STUPID you look for even offering up a this 'cutting torch made these 45-degree cuts' NONSENSE. (Click on the picture) Follow the massive column down and you will find a base plate that includes bolts and nuts on top of a concrete pad (another pic). You are making an argument for wasting a huge amount of cutting torch fuel and valuable demo worker time to make a fancy 45-degree angle cut on a box column with 4-inch sold steel sides, when the column pad bolts only needed to be loosened to hoist the entire column from this location.
Look at the pictures again and tell me where the 47 concrete slabs went???? :0)
The very first thing you need to do is come up with an explanation for what 'cut' thousands of WTC-7 structural steel connections AT THE SAME TIME to allow a CD-like Collapse. THEN start barking about demo workers cutting the collapsed steel members. Otherwise, your entire argument is from a guy that is definitely full of crap
GL,
Terral
Here's why you're wrong. Again. Look at this photo I marked up.
As the text in the picture asks, how in the hell did a shape charge, placed parallel to the face of the plate make 45 degree angle jagged cuts (shown with the red lines on the photo) THROUGH the plate?
YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP!
Another problem with the Official ‘Fire’ Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
This picture and above caption just make me laugh. Terral make the "45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts everywhere" comment followed by a photo that shows 90 degree breaks and the columns. Not only that, but the ONLY 45 degree cut pointed out by Terral in that photo, was later pointed out as a MISTAKE that Terral admitted to.
Also note that Terral points out in the photo above that there is "no melting" nor is there "burn marks". I also see no "thermite froth".
Terral, you have effectively shown with your own picture that no thermite was used. How funny.
Do you happen to have any GOOD, CLOSE photos of columns in from WTC7 that show the "thermite froth" on there ends? Or do you use hard to see pictures for a reason?
cuckoo believes this NONSENSE.
cuckoo. You are the Loyal Bushie/Obama DUPE. Not me . . . Here's why you're wrong. Again. Look at this photo I marked up.
As the text in the picture asks, how in the hell did a shape charge, placed parallel to the face of the plate make 45 degree angle jagged cuts (shown with the red lines on the photo) THROUGH the plate?
YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP!
Terral, you must have missed this post also...
Another problem with the Official ‘Fire’ Cover Story is these 45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts appear everywhere . . .
This picture and above caption just make me laugh. Terral make the "45-degree angle shaped-charge cuts everywhere" comment followed by a photo that shows 90 degree breaks and the columns. Not only that, but the ONLY 45 degree cut pointed out by Terral in that photo, was later pointed out as a MISTAKE that Terral admitted to.
Also note that Terral points out in the photo above that there is "no melting" nor is there "burn marks". I also see no "thermite froth".
Terral, you have effectively shown with your own picture that no thermite was used. How funny.
Do you happen to have any GOOD, CLOSE photos of columns in from WTC7 that show the "thermite froth" on there ends? Or do you use hard to see pictures for a reason?
Where is all the "thermite froth" signatures on those columns in the photo above? Care to point them out? Do you have any closeups of the WTC7 debris before cleanup started that shows the tremendous amount of "thermite froth" on the ends of the columns? All I see is you using distant photos that you can easily lead someone to believe whatever you want them to believe.
Sounds like Christophera really. All these photos are interpreted by you with no supporting evidence for what you say exists in each photo. You rely on your claim to be a "Demolitions Supervisor" to help lend credence to your views. EXACTLY like Christophera's core theory and the fact that he claims to be a construction worker AND welder and then goes on to TRY and make intelligent observations of the photos.
Any closeup photos I have looked up of the WTC7 columns show no froth anywhere? yet you claim it is everywhere. Where are those photos you have showing this?
cuckoo is that these 45-degree angle cuts were made by demolition workers 'after' the collapse by fire, so go right ahead and start explaining how that happened.confused have no "Building Fires Did It" Case.
Here's why you're wrong. Again. Look at this photo I marked up.
As the text in the picture asks, how in the hell did a shape charge, placed parallel to the face of the plate make 45 degree angle jagged cuts (shown with the red lines on the photo) THROUGH the plate?
YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP!
Hey Terral. No explanation for this eh?
