WOW! Only 50 People Show Up to See Hillary’s VP Tim Kaine in Miami

[Vigilante]

Veep team Comparison-Kaine Rally in Fla. vs Pence Rally in Fla....no fucking comparison!!!
Conservative Treehouse ^ | October 16, 2016 | Sundance

It cannot be overstated just how far the preferred corporate media narrative is disconnected from reality. The real battle is for your mind.

The institutional media goal is to grind down Trump/Pence supporter enthusiasm (which is massive), and artificially inflate the narrative of enthusiasm for Clinton/Kaine (which does not exist). Within the reality we find the disconnect outlining the "rigged system".

Tim Kaine goes to Miami-Dade, a regional geography with millions of registered Democrat voters, to deliver a rally speech and less than 50 people show up:

[Snip]

Remember, this is Miami Dade, Florida, "friendly territory". The only Florida county where Hillary Clinton has a statistical regional lead. The best turnout Kaine can get is a 50 person rally?…. think about it.

Meanwhile, Mike Pence holds a rally in Virginia - in the rain - and 650+ people stand outside in the downpour to support the ticket and hear him deliver a passionate speech in Williamsburg.

There simply is no comparison between the MASSIVE support for Trump/Pence and the almost inconsequential support for Clinton/Kaine.

We get it. Everything is about big crowds to you:

And they almost ruled the world...Hitlery trying to copy with Nazi tactics. as WikiLeaks has shown!

That is more of the endless hysteria that has made you the most boring poster on USMB.

btw, when are you going to start claiming that Cruz was really your first choice?

Thank you for letting me know I'm more than effective with the low 2 digit IQ crowd...known as Democrats, in case you didn't have someone explain it to you

 

[the_human_being]

Actually I was civil enough to allow you an opinion. You wish to deny me the same liberty. Ifr you have no skin in the game, then you are only in the game to receive something in return for someone else's investment. If you pay zero federal taxes, you shound not be allowed to vote in federal elections in my own opinion.

This is the small minded thinking that separates the parties and fuels the divide. I believe you feel you are being rational, but I'm not sure if you realize how belittling and insulting this idea is to our nations poor. Nor do I believe youve really thought through the logistics of implementing your idea, which makes it come off as a venting insult.

The right to vote is not a membership that is paid for through taxation. Our country provides an environment where it's citizens have the freedoms and opportunity to achieve success and live a prosperous life, those who are struggling in poverty get lifted up and those who work hard and are fortunate enough to earn more they contribute more by paying taxes. It's not very complicated a concept and has been at the heart of our country's identity.

Put something into the game and I'll agree with you. Until you actually have some skin in the game, I will hold to my opinion. Allo those who pay no federal income taxes are doing is reaping the benefits from what I pay for. They should have no say in anything until they earn the right to have a say. While they are reaping from what I sow and not from what they sow, they are simply dependents of the taxpayers.

Taxes aren't skin in the game, they are a shaving of the skin that you earn as a result of hard work AND the opportunity, infrastructure, currency, security and environment that is provided by our country and our collective. This collective has built our political system including taxation and entitlements. You have every right to speak your mind and express your opinions... I just think you are waaaay out of touch within the realm of reality with your idea, both operationally and emotionally in regards to connecting with the desire of the collective.

I stand on my opinion and I allow you to stand upon yours. Taxes are definitely skin in the game as is military service. Your government provides nothing that is not funded by the taxpayers. You government owes its very existence to the taxpayers. Your government is a dependent of the taxpayers just as are all those who benefit from the taxes derived from the taxpayers.
You say your country provides. Nay!!! Your taxpayers provide. Your country takes.

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Mr. Excitement draws a hell of a crowd...Lolololol!..Not a good sign in the heart of liberal land!

Gateway Pundit ^ | Oct 15th, 2016 10:53 pm | Jim Hoft



Tim Kaine held a very small rally today in Miami.

Wow, thats like 48 more than I thought would show up.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I got another one for ya... I hear Clintons second cousin used to make love to sheep. You should dig into that next!

Well, in his defense he is from Arkansas.

 

[Slade3200]

This is the small minded thinking that separates the parties and fuels the divide. I believe you feel you are being rational, but I'm not sure if you realize how belittling and insulting this idea is to our nations poor. Nor do I believe youve really thought through the logistics of implementing your idea, which makes it come off as a venting insult.

The right to vote is not a membership that is paid for through taxation. Our country provides an environment where it's citizens have the freedoms and opportunity to achieve success and live a prosperous life, those who are struggling in poverty get lifted up and those who work hard and are fortunate enough to earn more they contribute more by paying taxes. It's not very complicated a concept and has been at the heart of our country's identity.

Put something into the game and I'll agree with you. Until you actually have some skin in the game, I will hold to my opinion. Allo those who pay no federal income taxes are doing is reaping the benefits from what I pay for. They should have no say in anything until they earn the right to have a say. While they are reaping from what I sow and not from what they sow, they are simply dependents of the taxpayers.

Taxes aren't skin in the game, they are a shaving of the skin that you earn as a result of hard work AND the opportunity, infrastructure, currency, security and environment that is provided by our country and our collective. This collective has built our political system including taxation and entitlements. You have every right to speak your mind and express your opinions... I just think you are waaaay out of touch within the realm of reality with your idea, both operationally and emotionally in regards to connecting with the desire of the collective.

I stand on my opinion and I allow you to stand upon yours. Taxes are definitely skin in the game as is military service. Your government provides nothing that is not funded by the taxpayers. You government owes its very existence to the taxpayers. Your government is a dependent of the taxpayers just as are all those who benefit from the taxes derived from the taxpayers.
You say your country provides. Nay!!! Your taxpayers provide. Your country takes.

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

 

[the_human_being]

Put something into the game and I'll agree with you. Until you actually have some skin in the game, I will hold to my opinion. Allo those who pay no federal income taxes are doing is reaping the benefits from what I pay for. They should have no say in anything until they earn the right to have a say. While they are reaping from what I sow and not from what they sow, they are simply dependents of the taxpayers.

Taxes aren't skin in the game, they are a shaving of the skin that you earn as a result of hard work AND the opportunity, infrastructure, currency, security and environment that is provided by our country and our collective. This collective has built our political system including taxation and entitlements. You have every right to speak your mind and express your opinions... I just think you are waaaay out of touch within the realm of reality with your idea, both operationally and emotionally in regards to connecting with the desire of the collective.

I stand on my opinion and I allow you to stand upon yours. Taxes are definitely skin in the game as is military service. Your government provides nothing that is not funded by the taxpayers. You government owes its very existence to the taxpayers. Your government is a dependent of the taxpayers just as are all those who benefit from the taxes derived from the taxpayers.
You say your country provides. Nay!!! Your taxpayers provide. Your country takes.

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

 

[Slade3200]

Taxes aren't skin in the game, they are a shaving of the skin that you earn as a result of hard work AND the opportunity, infrastructure, currency, security and environment that is provided by our country and our collective. This collective has built our political system including taxation and entitlements. You have every right to speak your mind and express your opinions... I just think you are waaaay out of touch within the realm of reality with your idea, both operationally and emotionally in regards to connecting with the desire of the collective.

I stand on my opinion and I allow you to stand upon yours. Taxes are definitely skin in the game as is military service. Your government provides nothing that is not funded by the taxpayers. You government owes its very existence to the taxpayers. Your government is a dependent of the taxpayers just as are all those who benefit from the taxes derived from the taxpayers.
You say your country provides. Nay!!! Your taxpayers provide. Your country takes.

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

 

[the_human_being]

I stand on my opinion and I allow you to stand upon yours. Taxes are definitely skin in the game as is military service. Your government provides nothing that is not funded by the taxpayers. You government owes its very existence to the taxpayers. Your government is a dependent of the taxpayers just as are all those who benefit from the taxes derived from the taxpayers.
You say your country provides. Nay!!! Your taxpayers provide. Your country takes.

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

 

[g5000]

Mr. Excitement draws a hell of a crowd...Lolololol!..Not a good sign in the heart of liberal land!

Gateway Pundit ^ | Oct 15th, 2016 10:53 pm | Jim Hoft



Tim Kaine held a very small rally today in Miami.

That was for the opening of a campaign office. It was not a rally.

Dumb shit.

 

[g5000]

The real event was at a Miami church: Tim Kaine makes history: Delivers speech entirely in Spanish during Spanish-language church service - CNNPolitics.com

Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine made campaign history Sunday morning as the first presidential ticket candidate to deliver a speech entirely in Spanish during a Spanish-language church service.

"Yo soy catolico," Clinton's running mate said to the congregation at Pneuma Church in Miami, Florida.

 

[Flash]

I know it is anecdotal but I just don't see the support for Crooked Hillary here in my part of Central Florida.

In my county we usually go 60-40% for the Republican but I have always seen bumper stickers and yard signs for the filthy ass Democrat, especially when that jackass Hussein Obama was running.

I am not seeing hardly of that now. Nada, Zilch.

Pro Trump signs bumper stickers etc outnumber Crooked Hillary 100-1 if not more.

Trump drew much larger crowds when he comes to speak than Crooked Hillary.

If the dumbasses are going to vote for Crooked Hillary then they are ashamed to admit it. Actually, I don't blame them. If I was that stupid as to vote for a dishonest, corrupt lying incompetent bitch like Crooked Hillary I sure wouldn't want anybody to know it.

 

[easyt65]

'WOW! Only 50 People Show Up to See Hillary’s VP Tim Kaine in Miami'

Half of those were his family. It's safe to bet not many were CATHOLIC.

 

[easyt65]

The real event was at a Miami church: Tim Kaine makes history: Delivers speech entirely in Spanish during Spanish-language church service - CNNPolitics.com

How nice...pandering to illegals.

(Relax - it's a joke)

 

[Slade3200]

I don't disagree with that. You paint it in a negative light but in concept you are correct. It's not quite as simple as a take as that "take" IS our military, it is our programs that keeps us safe and clean and mobile and informed. It's what landed us in the moon, and stands up for those in the shadows. It's what makes our country great along with our citizens that comprise and created it

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

 

[the_human_being]

It is the taxpayer who funds the military. It was the taxpayer who funded the race to the moon. It is the taxpayer who funds efforts and agencues who keep us safe and clean. Non-taxpayers fund absolutely nothing.

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

 

[Slade3200]

How do you think these tax payers are earning their income? Who is buying the milk at the store and paying rent to the landlords? It's one system that we are all a part of and we all contribute to one way or another

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

I don't have a party... They are both garbage.

 

[the_human_being]

If you don't wish to purchase the milk, you can simply starve. You are purchasing the milk to survive - not to support the military or any other government program.

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

I don't have a party... They are both garbage.

You have no CLASS either.

 

[Slade3200]

I guess the point goes over your head. That's fine... national economics is a complicated thing, not everybody can grasp it all. I think the simple difference in thinking between us is the concept of promoting a system for the individual vs a system for the collective. It's a fine debate to have

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

I don't have a party... They are both garbage.

You have no CLASS either.

Haha, is that right? Is that because I don't agree with you? Most people jump to insults on this board, I listened to your ideas and presented my own without insult. Read your last few comments and show me where the class is at

 

[the_human_being]

Yes, you are obviously a Liberal who considers himself more intelligent than others. That is par for the course. The problem with your milk is that the milk is a consumable commodity that your non-taxpayer purchased to benefit himself. It is to be consumed by himself and not to benefit any others. That is where your example fails miserably. The taxpayers contribute to governmental agencies and functions that benefit the whole and not just themselves. You go right ahead with your smugness in believing you are intelligent. It is apparent that you are a taker and not a contributer.

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

I don't have a party... They are both garbage.

You have no CLASS either.

Haha, is that right? Is that because I don't agree with you? Most people jump to insults on this board, I listened to your ideas and presented my own without insult. Read your last few comments and show me where the class is at

No. Like a spoiled little bratt, you chimed in with the "I'm so much smarter than you." gibberish. That showed a remarkable lack of any class on your part.

 

[Slade3200]

I don't waste time comparing my intelligence with others, though it does seem to be a source of insecurity for you, it's a pointless exercise.

Without people buying the milk, the farmer and grocery store have no business, no means to hire employees, etc. all elements are essential in the act of commerce and it's the act of commerce that funds our country and government.

Well, your own Party called you stupid and easily manipulated. I'll have to accept their assessment. The taxpayers fund the country. You idiots who pay no taxes fund nothing.

I don't have a party... They are both garbage.

You have no CLASS either.

Haha, is that right? Is that because I don't agree with you? Most people jump to insults on this board, I listened to your ideas and presented my own without insult. Read your last few comments and show me where the class is at

No. Like a spoiled little bratt, you chimed in with the "I'm so much smarter than you." gibberish. That showed a remarkable lack of any class on your part.

That was a false judgement that you put on my statement. I responded by saying that I don't compare my intelligence with others.