It would have been fascinating to be a fly on the wall when they came up with THIS one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why does it need historic connotations?Well, none of those have the same historic connotations but whatever floats yer boat I guess.Well, lynchings are pretty rare these days but I can't see any reason not to have an anti-lynching bill. It certainly can't do any harm.They've been trying to get an anti-lynching bill signed in Congress for years now.
Are you for, or against such a bill? Why/why not?
How about a "anti-walking the plank bill" or a "anti-burning at the stake bill"
Maybe we could have an "anti-cat of nine tails" bill after those two
Day 454 of the 454 days in a row, MarcATL attempts to show whites are racist.
Wait for it.... the hook is coming.
Neither.How about a Law banning crucifixion?
Marc, do you see yourself as a Black person first or an American first?
That's what I thought
It depends on the details. That's where the devil is. What does this law do that murder laws don't?
While that doesn't really address my point and actually even undermines yours a bit I can't really disagree with you.They aren't really accomplishing anything else right now so why not?Well, none of those have the same historic connotations but whatever floats yer boat I guess.Well, lynchings are pretty rare these days but I can't see any reason not to have an anti-lynching bill. It certainly can't do any harm.
How about a "anti-walking the plank bill" or a "anti-burning at the stake bill"
Maybe we could have an "anti-cat of nine tails" bill after those two
So, you want to pass a bill dealing with actions today based upon historical connotations vice what is actually happening today?
Is that really what you think the job of the government is?
The less they do the better off the country is.
Weren't you one of those self-proclaimed conservatives that was for more laws over that Kathryn Steinle situation in where she got killed, by mistake, by an illegal immigrant? Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives everywhere were screaming for adding more laws in that situation.Why do we need an anti-lynching bill/law? Lynching is murder and it’s against the law. We don’t have anti-death by gunshot laws that I know of, or anti-stabbing someone to death laws. No matter how you kill someone you’ve broken the law and subject to punishment.
Hey, give 'em credit, it's a shrewd (if terribly intellectually dishonest and cynical) political move.Absolutely nothing. Except the 100,000th weak and stupid attempt at reinforcing the narrative that America is still racist.It depends on the details. That's where the devil is. What does this law do that murder laws don't?
I didn't say it t needed them, I said the other things didn't have the same ones.Why does it need historic connotations?Well, none of those have the same historic connotations but whatever floats yer boat I guess.Well, lynchings are pretty rare these days but I can't see any reason not to have an anti-lynching bill. It certainly can't do any harm.They've been trying to get an anti-lynching bill signed in Congress for years now.
Are you for, or against such a bill? Why/why not?
How about a "anti-walking the plank bill" or a "anti-burning at the stake bill"
Maybe we could have an "anti-cat of nine tails" bill after those two
Like the Kathryn Steinle laws most of your fellow self-proclaimed conservatives were screaming for not-too-long ago?I am against all bullshit feel good legislation. Waste of time and money
Neither.How about a Law banning crucifixion?
Marc, do you see yourself as a Black person first or an American first?
That's what I thought
I'm a child of God first.
We need something more. A five times deported felon sneaks back in and steals a gun and murders Kate Steinle! We need a wall. A really big wall.Weren't you one of those self-proclaimed conservatives that was for more laws over that Kathryn Steinle situation in where she got killed, by mistake, by an illegal immigrant? Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives everywhere were screaming for adding more laws in that situation.Why do we need an anti-lynching bill/law? Lynching is murder and it’s against the law. We don’t have anti-death by gunshot laws that I know of, or anti-stabbing someone to death laws. No matter how you kill someone you’ve broken the law and subject to punishment.
Wha happened?!?!??
Like the Kathryn Steinle laws most of your fellow self-proclaimed conservatives were screaming for not-too-long ago?I am against all bullshit feel good legislation. Waste of time and money
Your plot sounds very interesting...please, do go on.It's a cynical political ploy, nothing more.
]Hey, give 'em credit, it's a shrewd (if terribly intellectually dishonest and cynical) political move.
It's not about who would vote for or against it, it's about the fact that it was brought up at all - as if it just HAD to be.
Nasty stuff.
.
Hey, give 'em credit, it's a shrewd (if terribly intellectually dishonest and cynical) political move.Absolutely nothing. Except the 100,000th weak and stupid attempt at reinforcing the narrative that America is still racist.It depends on the details. That's where the devil is. What does this law do that murder laws don't?
It's not about who would vote for or against it, it's about the fact that it was brought up at all - as if it just HAD to be.
Nasty stuff.
.
They've been trying to get an anti-lynching bill signed in Congress for years now.
Are you for, or against such a bill? Why/why not?