Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 92,759
- 129,752
- 3,615
Ah, your surrender is accepted.Were you born this stupid or did you have to work on it?
Have a nice day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, your surrender is accepted.Were you born this stupid or did you have to work on it?
Not a requirement. All people are militia. You're fucking stupid.On that note, which well regulated militia are you a member of?
So, a judge ruled this about something that doesn't exist?a nuke is not a weapon with any reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of service in a well-regulated militia
You don't know jackshit about anything.M4s were around in 1791? I don't think so.
BTW, for training purposes I have 4 bushmaster M4s with the happy fun switch. They stay down at the sheriff's lockup and they let us use their range. Plus they think it's great fun because we let them play too.
We cannot carry them domestically but the guys need to be exposed to them for when we escort someone outside the US. Mostly south America.
But I am intimately familiar with the amount of damage you can do with select fire weapon, even if you don't go to full rock and roll.
And yes, I have both an FFL and an SOT.
Nothing to wonder. Reality is that what is written in the Constitution is important and your opinion is not.See, that's the kinda answer that would make anyone wonder.
where does it say you have to be in a militia??On that note, which well regulated militia are you a member of?
There have been amendments to rectify that.You don't know jackshit about anything.
Nobody has ever been harmed with my machine gun and I have had it since the 1970s.
So in1791 only White land owning men could vote. Do you really want to use that as the baseline for rights?
So, you do know the process. I am surprised.There have been amendments to rectify that.
DERP
Then why was the Constitution not reinterpreted that way until the mid 1980s?Nothing to wonder. Reality is that what is written in the Constitution is important and your opinion is not.
the constitution is very clear and doesnt need interpretation,,Then why was the Constitution not reinterpreted that way until the mid 1980s?
Right there in the text of the amendment, right next to where it doesn't say you can have everything the military does.where does it say you have to be in a militia??
It was interpreted differently before that.the constitution is very clear and doesnt need interpretation,,
it doesnt say you have to be in one,, and because it says militia which is a civilian military that means THE PEOPLE need military arms,,Right there in the text of the amendment, right next to where it doesn't say you can have everything the military does.
that is an attempt to usurp it,,It was interpreted differently before that.
If?Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?
If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
Nothing in there says anything about the right being conditioned on actual membership in a particular militia. All it says is that a militia is necessary for the security of a free state. And, because it is necessary, FedGov will not infringe on the right of the people.Right there in the text of the amendment, right next to where it doesn't say you can have everything the military does.
considering there are 100's of millions of guns in this country and only a few illegal shootings a year says there are a lot of responsible gun owners,,If?
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...
If there were such a thing as a "responsible" gun owner you wouldn't need ask the question.
Yeah, you can go ahead and shut your fucking cake hole. You have already proved the point about leftists being gun-grabbing shits.If?
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...
If there were such a thing as a "responsible" gun owner you wouldn't need ask the question.
No it was not.It was interpreted differently before that.
"shall not be infringed" is not in the text?