Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto M4 carbine?

M4s were around in 1791? I don't think so.

BTW, for training purposes I have 4 bushmaster M4s with the happy fun switch. They stay down at the sheriff's lockup and they let us use their range. Plus they think it's great fun because we let them play too.

We cannot carry them domestically but the guys need to be exposed to them for when we escort someone outside the US. Mostly south America.

But I am intimately familiar with the amount of damage you can do with select fire weapon, even if you don't go to full rock and roll.

And yes, I have both an FFL and an SOT.
You don't know jackshit about anything.

Nobody has ever been harmed with my machine gun and I have had it since the 1970s.

So in1791 only White land owning men could vote. Do you really want to use that as the baseline for rights?
 
You don't know jackshit about anything.

Nobody has ever been harmed with my machine gun and I have had it since the 1970s.

So in1791 only White land owning men could vote. Do you really want to use that as the baseline for rights?
There have been amendments to rectify that.

DERP
 
Right there in the text of the amendment, right next to where it doesn't say you can have everything the military does.
it doesnt say you have to be in one,, and because it says militia which is a civilian military that means THE PEOPLE need military arms,,
 
Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?

If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
If?
If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...
If there were such a thing as a "responsible" gun owner you wouldn't need ask the question.
 
Right there in the text of the amendment, right next to where it doesn't say you can have everything the military does.
Nothing in there says anything about the right being conditioned on actual membership in a particular militia. All it says is that a militia is necessary for the security of a free state. And, because it is necessary, FedGov will not infringe on the right of the people.

We can have everything the military has because "shall not be infringed" means no restrictions of any kind.

You can dick suck your way around the words all you want. Any other way you try to spin it is nonsense and deviates from the plain meaning of the text.

You don't like it? AMEND, YOU BUTTFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT!!!
 
It was interpreted differently before that.
No it was not.
:laughing0301:

We had over 100 years of SCOTUS jurisprudence before a single 2nd Amendment case even went before the Court. It was NEVER even questioned or doubted until you socialists kuuunts decided that the only way to get your fucked up ideology to take hold is by force, and that will never happen as long as we have guns.
 

Forum List

Back
Top