Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It actually specifies that the right applies to militia membership and was interpreted that way until activist judges got ahold of it in 2008.Nothing in there says anything about the right being conditioned on actual membership in a particular militia. All it says is that a militia is necessary for the security of a free state. And, because it is necessary, FedGov will not infringe on the right of the people.
We can have everything the military has because "shall not be infringed" means no restrictions of any kind.
You can dick suck your way around the words all you want. Any other way you try to spin it is nonsense and deviates from the plain meaning of the text.
You don't like it? AMEND, YOU BUTTFUCKING PIECE OF SHIT!!!
On that note, which well regulated militia are you a member of?
Because it was understood. Nobody had reason to change it, everyone knew what it meant.It was NEVER even questioned
Ah, this thing you made up in your head.The GENERAL militia. That which is made up of every able bodied male between the ages of 18 and 65.
Though I am now 75. I am in good shape.
Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?
If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
how does,, "THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE" mean militia members???It actually specifies that the right applies to militia membership and was interpreted that way until activist judges got ahold of it in 2008.
Do you think the meaning changed after being interpreted one way for well over 200 years? Or do you think the supreme court and many other courts at all levels were wrong for over 200 years?
YesWould you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?
If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
You obviously have never shot an automatic weapon. On full auto the first round goes where you are aiming. the second, a foot or so higher, the third a foot or so higher than that and the rest of the rounds go above the target. So a fully automatic weapon (a machine gun or Assault Weapon/Rifle) actually does less damage than a semi automatic one. That's why the military got rid of full auto on it's rifles and went to three round bursts.Why?
They can do huge amounts of damage in a very short time, why do you need it?
Why do you NEED to go to Lincoln? I'm sure a text, phone call or email would accomplish your ends as well as wasting valuable resources and putting yourself and other people in danger by actually driving there.Because otherwise it would take all day to get to Lincoln from here.
Next?
Ah, this thing you made up in your head.
Cool, I guess. Don't forget to wear your helmet.
You know, I honestly don't care what my neighbor owns as long as he uses it in a legal manner. Jet fighter, fine, B-52 bomber, fine, M-1 Tank, go for it. Personally I can't see where anyone would want to own any of them, but it's a free country, so go for it."Shall not be infringed" doesn't specify. Do you want your neighbor to have a nuclear bomb?
"The whole of the people"On that note, which well regulated militia are you a member of?"
Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?
No it doesn't. The framers saw the entire body of white adult males to be the militia. read their letters. or the Federalist Papers some time. They specifically address the point multiple times.It actually specifies that the right applies to militia membership and was interpreted that way until activist judges got ahold of it in 2008.
Do you think the meaning changed after being interpreted one way for well over 200 years? Or do you think the supreme court and many other courts at all levels were wrong for over 200 years?
If a person can not be trusted to be free among the population with an M4, then they should not be loose in public.Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?
If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
Crappyass is far too stupid to grasp anything written by the founders.No it doesn't. The framers saw the entire body of white adult males to be the militia. read their letters. or the Federalist Papers some time. They specifically address the point multiple times.
You obviously have never shot an automatic weapon. On full auto the first round goes where you are aiming. the second, a foot or so higher, the third a foot or so higher than that and the rest of the rounds go above the target. So a fully automatic weapon (a machine gun or Assault Weapon/Rifle) actually does less damage than a semi automatic one. That's why the military got rid of full auto on it's rifles and went to three round bursts.
Although for the most part you're correct, some of us had the ammo budget and training required that at 25m we could put a full 30rnd mag of 5.56mm into a man sized target in a single trigger pull.You obviously have never shot an automatic weapon. On full auto the first round goes where you are aiming. the second, a foot or so higher, the third a foot or so higher than that and the rest of the rounds go above the target. So a fully automatic weapon (a machine gun or Assault Weapon/Rifle) actually does less damage than a semi automatic one. That's why the military got rid of full auto on it's rifles and went to three round bursts.
