Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto M4 carbine?

There is no test for everyone being responsible. It's an assumption. It cannot be anything else when they all say they need a gun to protect themselves when that scenario never happens.
That's how freedom works - you are presumed responible until you demonstrate otherwise.
Give the microscopic percentage of guns used to commit murder the US, its a pretty good presumption.
 
Each and every gun used in a crime started out in the possession of a "responsible gun owner."

So much for responsibility.





Yeah, then they were STOLEN by criminals. Criminals that you constantly let free from prison.

STOP IT!
 
Last edited:
Fully automatic weapons can be legally owned with the proper documentation, background check and enormous fee. Is the poster asking whether we would allow a person to possess an illegal weapon? The problem with the anti-2nd Amendment (anti-Bill of Rights) crowd is that they aren't familiar with the law or the freaking Constitution. Thank you U.S. Dept. Ed. for fifty years of teaching kids how to put a condom on a banana.
 
Fully automatic weapons can be legally owned with the proper documentation, background check and enormous fee. Is the poster asking whether we would allow a person to possess an illegal weapon? The problem with the anti-2nd Amendment (anti-Bill of Rights) crowd is that they aren't familiar with the law or the freaking Constitution. Thank you U.S. Dept. Ed. for fifty years of teaching kids how to put a condom on a banana.

The fully auto weapon has to be made before 1981 for it to be legal with documentation.

An M4 Carbine was made well after 1981.
 
1632962074876.png
 
Who cares? Militia service has nothing to do with owning guns.
 
It actually specifies that the right applies to militia membership and was interpreted that way until activist judges got ahold of it in 2008.

Do you think the meaning changed after being interpreted one way for well over 200 years? Or do you think the supreme court and many other courts at all levels were wrong for over 200 years?

Wrong. Not even close. Only after
People like you began to pretend that the simple text didnt mean what it said was it necessary for Scalia to explain it to you…..he goes through the entire history of the Right in the Heller opinion from the Right in England to the right here feom the colonies to the founding.
 
Because it was understood. Nobody had reason to change it, everyone knew what it meant.

Yes they did and do…..it means we have the Right to keep and bear arma and has nothing to with the militia… try reading Heller.
 
Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?

If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?

Full-auto is over-rated and too expensive. Just get a rubber band if you want to waste some ammunition...

 
Would you allow everyone to own a fully auto capable M4 carbine?

If everyone was a responsible gun owner who never committed crimes? If somehow we could filter out the irresponsible gun owners?
Sure.....the person kills, and if they want to they'll find a tool......Tim McVeigh didn't use a gun, neither did Bin Laden
 

Forum List

Back
Top