HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 18,339
- 7,548
- 375
- Thread starter
- #41
So getting back to this subject:
Jesus is a created image of a man using real martyrs and mythical figures and biblical characters plagiarized.
One of the greatest evidences is the image needs a birthdate so they borrow his father's (his emulated mythology) Dec 25th Baal's birthdate. His resurrection scene making him deified & his seat above his father is borrowed from his father Baal's mythology. Undeniable never refuted
Proof is sitting in thr Brittish Museum, the 700bc Assyrian tablets can not be refited for they read the scene to a "T" including borrowing his baal sun circle cross.
Marduk-Bel Tablets
(Baal in
Hebrew) is described in a passion play in which:
(1) Bel is taken prisoner;
(2) Bel is tried in a great hall;
(3) Bel is smitten;
(4) Bel is led away to the Mount (a sacred grove on a
hilltop);
(5) with Bel are taken two malefactors, one of whom is
released;
(6) After Bel has gone to the Mount and is executed,
the city breaks into tumult;
(7) Bel's clothes are carried away;
(8.) Bel goes down into the Mount and disappears from
life;
(9) weeping women seek Bel at the Tomb;
(10) Bel is brought back to life.
Fact: Baal's son is the morning star which they claimed was Jesus-Rev 22:16
Ishtar(easter)/[Isis] son was the morning star and Isis is the wife of Baal.
So in creating the image of Jesus who was recorded as 4'6" suddenly he looks more ROMAN or European then Jewish, no longer depicted as a munchkin, he's made taller & into an image of perfection (warned in Ezekiel 28 Lucifer would be an image of a man, one made perfect.
So if you had figures that looked like angry trolls would you still give your fable the same attention or do these image help sell the product they are feeding you?
Jesus is a created image of a man using real martyrs and mythical figures and biblical characters plagiarized.
One of the greatest evidences is the image needs a birthdate so they borrow his father's (his emulated mythology) Dec 25th Baal's birthdate. His resurrection scene making him deified & his seat above his father is borrowed from his father Baal's mythology. Undeniable never refuted
Proof is sitting in thr Brittish Museum, the 700bc Assyrian tablets can not be refited for they read the scene to a "T" including borrowing his baal sun circle cross.
Marduk-Bel Tablets
(Baal in
Hebrew) is described in a passion play in which:
(1) Bel is taken prisoner;
(2) Bel is tried in a great hall;
(3) Bel is smitten;
(4) Bel is led away to the Mount (a sacred grove on a
hilltop);
(5) with Bel are taken two malefactors, one of whom is
released;
(6) After Bel has gone to the Mount and is executed,
the city breaks into tumult;
(7) Bel's clothes are carried away;
(8.) Bel goes down into the Mount and disappears from
life;
(9) weeping women seek Bel at the Tomb;
(10) Bel is brought back to life.
Fact: Baal's son is the morning star which they claimed was Jesus-Rev 22:16
Ishtar(easter)/[Isis] son was the morning star and Isis is the wife of Baal.
So in creating the image of Jesus who was recorded as 4'6" suddenly he looks more ROMAN or European then Jewish, no longer depicted as a munchkin, he's made taller & into an image of perfection (warned in Ezekiel 28 Lucifer would be an image of a man, one made perfect.
So if you had figures that looked like angry trolls would you still give your fable the same attention or do these image help sell the product they are feeding you?
Last edited:
