Would a trump supporter like to take a shot at explaining this?

Ironically, MAGA and our adversaries share the same goal: Burn down our foundational institutions, and then re-build them in their image.
/——/ “Burn down our foundational institutions”
Those would be grown men changing in little girls locker room, surgeries that mutilate young boys and girls, transvestites teaching sex acts to little kids… you bet your azz we’ll burn them down.
 
/——/ “Burn down our foundational institutions”
Those would be grown men changing in little girls locker room, surgeries that mutilate young boys and girls, transvestites teaching sex acts to little kids… you bet your azz we’ll burn them down.
You think that those are America's foundational institutions.

I absolutely believe that you absolutely believe that.
 
WTF is puck news ?
It's a media company started by losers from Vanity Fair, and Politico....Completely biased left, and fits in nicely with the echo chamber sites like Raw Story rely on....

Berg only gets his info from these cesspools of bias....
 
Ironically, MAGA and our adversaries share the same goal: Burn down our foundational institutions, and then re-build them in their image.
An FBI rebuilt in Patel's image would be one of rampant illegality in the name of Dotard.
 
It's a media company started by losers from Vanity Fair, and Politico....Completely biased left, and fits in nicely with the echo chamber sites like Raw Story rely on....

Berg only gets his info from these cesspools of bias....

Oh, he can find the worst of the worst, for sure.
 
I'm trying to imagine a world after Jan. 20 in which Patel and Bondi would not charge a Dem under similar circumstances to Gaetz's.

Gaetz report renews debate about how he escaped federal charges


The House Ethics Committee report about former Rep. Matt Gaetz offers some hints about why the Justice Department decided not to prosecute the former Florida congressman after a wide-ranging federal investigation into whether he committed sex trafficking.

The decision likely stemmed from concerns about the strength of the evidence and the department’s history of applying sex-trafficking laws narrowly, former prosecutors said Monday.

The modern federal sex trafficking law is limited to cases involving coercion, fraud or the interstate or international movement of minors for sex. Despite its damning evidence of wide-ranging violations of law and House rules by Gaetz, the Ethics Committee report did not find those factors.

An older statute, known as the Mann Act, sweeps more broadly, but the Justice Department as a matter of discretion limits its application to particularly egregious acts of trafficking.

 
I'm trying to imagine a world after Jan. 20 in which Patel and Bondi would not charge a Dem under similar circumstances to Gaetz's.

Gaetz report renews debate about how he escaped federal charges


The House Ethics Committee report about former Rep. Matt Gaetz offers some hints about why the Justice Department decided not to prosecute the former Florida congressman after a wide-ranging federal investigation into whether he committed sex trafficking.

The decision likely stemmed from concerns about the strength of the evidence and the department’s history of applying sex-trafficking laws narrowly, former prosecutors said Monday.

The modern federal sex trafficking law is limited to cases involving coercion, fraud or the interstate or international movement of minors for sex. Despite its damning evidence of wide-ranging violations of law and House rules by Gaetz, the Ethics Committee report did not find those factors.

An older statute, known as the Mann Act, sweeps more broadly, but the Justice Department as a matter of discretion limits its application to particularly egregious acts of trafficking.

Oh come on....If Gaetz were a democrat, people like you would be giving him a standing O, on the floor....
 
/—-/ I’m wondering if that was their intention. A quick way to cull the number of applicants. My pharmaceutical company had a different approach to eliminate 100 applicants down to the final five.
In the case of the company that I'm referring to, it was a union shop and these were active employees. There was no culling--LOL, they may have wanted to after our exodus, but we weren't castigated at all. The culture change was pretty much a failure.
 
Why would trump's nominee to run the FBI have sought immunity from criminal prosecution in order to give testimony to the grand jury regarding what he knew about trump's illegal possession of classified documents?
/—-/ Say what?
 

Bizarre RFK job application asks about clairvoyance and interest in 'sexual experiences'


New reporting flagged what it called an "unusual" application to work for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in which applicants are asked a slew of bizarre questions, including a pattern completion test and even whether they have an interest in having "sexual experiences with another person."

Brian Hughes, a spokesman for the Trump transition team, confirmed to Puck News that the application and subsequent questionnaire are both real and being used by Kennedy’s team.

"Many nominees and appointees are soliciting résumés and then submitting them to the transition for the consideration and process,” he told reporter Tara Palmeri.


What kinds of questions are these for a job application? Clairvoyance is a prerequisite to work at HHS? Why hasn't someone put a stop to this?
That dude is whacked.
 
Why would trump's nominee to run the FBI have sought immunity from criminal prosecution in order to give testimony to the grand jury regarding what he knew about trump's illegal possession of classified documents?

Poor bergy
 
Why would trump's nominee to run the FBI have sought immunity from criminal prosecution in order to give testimony to the grand jury regarding what he knew about trump's illegal possession of classified documents?
I hadn't realized he did.

Pretty damning if it's true.
 
I hadn't realized he did.

Pretty damning if it's true.
WASHINGTON — Trump advisor Kash Patel has been granted immunity by the Justice Department, NBC News confirmed, after a judge ruled that an immunity offer was the only way to compel Patel to testify in the ongoing probe of classified documents removed from the White House in the final days of former President Donald Trump’s first term.

Patel is expected to testify soon in the case, NBC reported.

Patel’s testimony is considered crucial to answering the question of whether Trump declassified any of the documents he took with him to his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago. FBI agents removed thousands of government documents during a raid of Trump’s property in August, including more than 100 that bore classification markings.
 
Back
Top Bottom