Mrkelly
Platinum Member
- Mar 21, 2024
- 1,389
- 919
- 938
democrats take the Epstein bait hook, line and sinker
- Thread starter Doc7505
- Start date
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #242
OMGit’s worse than I thought
We should prosecute the people that raped little kids
Even if the perv that supplied those little kids is dead
Do you agree?
Yes, pedos should be jailed for life with great big white guys with shaved heads and lots of tattoos.
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,368
- 20,782
- 2,290
Big time parties and gatherings have always existed among the rich and famous (especially in Hollywood), but not all participants were for going into the back room's of these parties or going to parties that were known to have strange thing's allegedly going on and/or criminal operations in play behind the scenes or in the background.Believe me, Trump will never forget that jet, the Lolita Express! lol.
View attachment 1138473
Donald Trump had a well-documented social relationship with Jeffrey Epstein during the 1990s and early 2000s, including attending parties together, flying on Epstein's private jets multiple times, and frequenting some of the same social circles and properties, such as Mar-a-Lago and Epstein's Manhattan residence 2578.
Key points about their relationship and allegations down here:
Friendship and Socializing: Trump and Epstein were seen together at various social events and parties in the 1990s. Trump reportedly flew on Epstein’s planes from about 1993 to 1997 2.
Claims from Epstein: Jeffrey Epstein claimed in recorded interviews that Trump was a close friend for about a decade and alleged Trump first met Melania on Epstein’s plane. Epstein also made unverified claims about Trump’s sexual behavior and seduction techniques 5.
Lawsuits and Denials: Trump has denied writing a sexually suggestive letter to Epstein and any wrongdoing related to Epstein, calling such reports false and defamatory. He has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and others over a story alleging inappropriate conduct 13.
Public and Legal Scrutiny: Some documents related to Epstein’s cases mention Trump, but many have been public for years without revealing direct criminal involvement by Trump 4. There is no publicly verified evidence implicating Trump in Epstein’s crimes or proving he committed illegal acts.
Relationship Ended Around 2004: Reports indicate the friendship turned sour around 2004 after a dispute over real estate 2.
In summary, while Trump and Epstein were socially connected and Trump’s behavior and associations with Epstein have been questioned and scrutinized, there is no verified evidence that Trump engaged in Epstein’s criminal activities or was directly involved in his illegal conduct as of now. Much of the more salacious claims come from Epstein’s unverified statements and remain allegations without corroboration 69.
sources:
1. Trump mired in Epstein controversy as Wall Street Journal reports on 2003 letter
2. The new revelation about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, explained
3. Trump sues Murdoch and Wall Street Journal for $10bn over Epstein article
4. Trump claims Epstein files are faked, but many documents have been public for years
5. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf
6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/17/trump-epstein-relationship-records/
7. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/us/politics/timeline-trump-epstein.html
8. How well did Trump and Epstein really know each other? A timeline
9. https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/19/politics/epstein-trump-ties-analysis
I imagine that not all celebrities that went to visit with P. DIDDY were guilty of his lifestyle and antics either, but we've seen the same possible frame jobs attempted in that case as well.
Trump without him knowing about the hidden thing's that a cautious Epstein would have hidden from his eye's (i.e. because Epstein would have known that Trump wasn't a pedophile or even a so called "minor attracted person" ), could still have had Trump in to close to the heat, otherwise where as his enemies would try and implicate him because of the close encounters he had with the billionaire Epstien.
Even knowing full well themselves that he wasn't involved with that part of the criminal side of it at all, the political left (because Trump is a figure that they hate so badly), would love to make him a target of their alleged misinformation campaign that hopes to falsely indict him regardless of him not being involved.
The people who are accusing Trump for political purposes, seems to be that they appear to be trying to connect Trump to the criminal enterprise without him being guilty by evidence of any such of a thing so far, but they are trying feverishly to connect him to the criminal side of that enterprise, otherwise as far as their alledged accusations go that they are attempting to use against him.
Epstien being the type of person that he was alleged to be, uhhhh brings one to think that one could say that he had to be a superb reader of one's character and/or personality before revealing a criminal enterprise to them right ?
So Epstein himself had to be careful of the people that were around him, otherwise for whom he let into his private criminal world right ?... Epstien had to treat everyone different because people have red lines that they won't cross, and Trump definitely looks and carries himself like a type of person who had red lines that he wouldn't cross, especially when it came to him not being that of a pedophile or a minor attracted person for whom Epstien would have definitely known that he wasn't going to be or would not ever engage in, otherwise for any type of criminal shenanigans and such.............
Trump IMO would not cross such a line as going to an alledged sexual blackmail island if Epstein was thinking to include him in that sort of thing. The man had to much to lose for him to do such a thing as that right ?
It's the old guilt by association in play going on I guess, and so the enemies of Trump need way more evidence than what they have to bring the Trump man down.
Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,521
- 41,863
- 2,430
- Thread starter
- #244
~~~~~~
You forget who was director of the FBI (C. Wray) and AG (W. Barr) at the time, none of whom were friends to Trump.
Then there's Merrick Garland who actually persecuted Trump followers and Trump himself.
Does anyone really believe if there was anything within the Epstein files detrimental to Trump that either of these three individuals wouldn't have broadcasted it to try and destroy Trump?
Huh? When did I say they weren’t?
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #246
What do you think they have been doing in Hollywood and LA since the 1930s? Clara Bow and many of the others died young and alcoholic with failed livers, etc.
This was going on in Rome, in Athens, in Sodom and Gomorrah. This is one of mankind's great failings.
Of course not, even these dembots that purge hoax know that….but they are sad and desperate and have nothing else to campaign or attack Trump on since he’s a massive success
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,368
- 20,782
- 2,290
And that convicts Trump by association with history ??
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #249
And that convicts Trump by association with history ??
No, but historically such groups exist in all societies and times
dudmuck
Diamond Member
Jack Smith was an inferior officer, and not a principle officer. This makes the appointment constitutional, because inferior officers are under AG supervision.
The precedence for this is Bill Barr's appointment of Nicolas Bua, Malcolm Wilkey, and Frederick Lacey. Barr cited 28 U.S.C. § 533 and 28 C.F.R. § 600 to appoint special and/or independent counsels.
Sorry a court disagree with you e had US attoorny powers
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,368
- 20,782
- 2,290
And that convicts Trump in a leftist mindset ?
Leftist - It's just got to be true, it just has to be, it just has to be.. Pulling hair out at that point...
Mrkelly
Platinum Member
- Mar 21, 2024
- 1,389
- 919
- 938
Maybe whe
maybe when you said this
“When he died…we don’t prosecute dead people”
Case closed?
maybe when you said this“When he died…we don’t prosecute dead people”
Case closed?
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,368
- 20,782
- 2,290
You can prosecute the dead now ?Maybe whe
“When he died…we don’t prosecute dead people”
Case closed?
The one against Epstein yes.Maybe whe
“When he died…we don’t prosecute dead people”
Case closed?
Never been involed in a lawsuit or legal matter with legal depositions and the like. Have you.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #257
And that convicts Trump in a leftist mindset ?
Leftist - It's just got to be true, it just has to be, it just has to be.. Pulling hair out at that point...
It certainly makes it plausible and should be investigated.
Beagle9 is a bozo who cannot follow logical thought.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #258
And that convicts Trump in a leftist mindset ?
Leftist - It's just got to be true, it just has to be, it just has to be.. Pulling hair out at that point...
Not at all, beaglebozo. But it should be investigated, yes.
skye
Diamond Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 70,480
- 80,428
- 3,635
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,133
- 2,488
- Banned
- #260
Similar threads
